Menu Close

Tag: 2024 News

Study Shows California Utilization of Medical Care for Injured Workers Declines

The Workers Compensation Research Institute (WCRI) is an independent, not-for-profit research organization based in Cambridge, MA. Founded in 1983, the Institute does not take positions on the issues it researches; rather, it provides information obtained through studies and data collection efforts, which conform to recognized scientific methods.

A new set of studies from the WCRI found that utilization of medical services by workers with injuries declined in the majority of the 17 study states. The studies address two aspects of utilization: the percentage of claims receiving a particular medical service, and the number of services provided.

“We continue to see the effects of the pandemic on 2022 claims with experience through March 2023,” said Sebastian Negrusa, vice president of research for WCRI. “Besides strained hospital capacity and avoided medical care by many people out of fear of COVID-19 in the early months of the pandemic, waves of increased COVID-19 cases and medical provider shortages may have also affected the delivery of medical care. Even in the few cases where utilization in certain states has begun to rebound, we do not see it reaching pre-pandemic levels yet.”

The studies, CompScope Medical Benchmarks, 25th Edition, examined medical payments, prices, and utilization overall and by provider and type of service across 17 states and how these metrics of medical payments have changed over time. The following are sample findings for some of the study states:

– – California: Utilization of medical services decreased in 2022, particularly in the percentage of claims with inpatient care and facility services (both hospital outpatient departments and ambulatory surgery centers).
– – Indiana: Utilization declined in 2022, particularly for major surgery and facility services.
– – Minnesota: Unlike most study states, utilization of most services in Minnesota either stayed stable or began to increase in 2022.
– – North Carolina: Decreasing utilization was a driver of the state’s decline in medical payments per claim in 2022, in contrast to many study states which experienced growth.
– – Pennsylvania: The share of claims with facility services in the state declined more than most study states since 2019.

The analysis results reflect experience on claims through March 2023, including non-COVID-19 claims from the pandemic period (March 2020-September 2022). The studies, therefore, provide a look at how the pandemic impacted non-COVID-19 workers’ compensation claims. The 17 study states ― Arkansas, California, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Wisconsin ― represent about 60 percent of all workers’ compensation benefit payments nationwide. Individual reports are available for every state except Arkansas, Iowa, and Tennessee.

Click here for more information on these studies.

DWC Set 2025 Profile Audit Review and Full Compliance Audit Standards

The Division of Workers’ Compensation’s (DWC) Audit and Enforcement Unit conducts a profile audit review (PAR) for all adjusting locations of California workers’ compensation claims at least once every five years, per the requirements of Labor Code sections 129 and 129.5.

Performance of the adjusting locations is measured in five areas of claims administration:

– – The payment of accrued and undisputed indemnity
– – The late first payment of temporary disability / first notice of salary continuation
– – The late first payment of permanent disability and death benefits
– – The late subsequent indemnity payments
– – The provision of notices with Qualified Medical Evaluator/Agreed Medical Evaluator advice.

DWC annually establishes profile audit review and full compliance audit (FCA) standards in accordance with Labor Code sections 129(b)(1) and (2) and California Code of Regulations, title 8 (8 C.C.R.), section 10107.1. The 2025 standards are based on the audit results of calendar years 2021 through 2023.

Performance standards for 2025

The PAR performance standard for audits conducted in 2025 is 1.57376. Audit subjects with PAR performance ratings of 1.57376 or lower will be required to pay any unpaid compensation, but no administrative penalties will be assessed. If an audit subject’s PAR performance rating is 1.57377 or higher, the audit will expand to a FCA, and an additional sample of indemnity claims will be audited.

The FCA performance standard for audits conducted in 2025 is 2.14192. Audit subjects with an FCA performance rating of 2.14192 or less will be required to pay any unpaid compensation and administrative penalties will be assessed for all violations involving unpaid and late paid compensation. If an audit subject’s full compliance audit performance rating is 2.14193 or higher, an additional sample of denied claims as well as the expanded sample of indemnity claims will be audited. Penalties will be assessed for allviolations as appropriate pursuant to 8 C.C.R. sections 10111 through 10111.2.

Severity Rate standard for 2025

The Severity Rate standard for 2025 is $157.44.

More information on the performance standards that will be in use for the profile audit reviews and full compliance audits during calendar year 2025 will be posted on the DWC Audit and Enforcement Unit web page.

Business Group on Health 2025 Employer Health Care Strategy Survey

The Business Group on Health 2025 Employer Health Care Strategy Survey explored ways employers address health care costs and key benefit strategy considerations in the near future and long-term. Among inflationary pressures in the health care sector, worsening chronic condition burden in the population and the demand for many ground breaking – albeit expensive – treatments, employers are juggling many priorities. Strategies to lower costs, improve outcomes and strengthen the employee experience were explored in this survey.

Fielded between June 3 and July 12, the survey was completed by 125 employers that cover more than 17.1 million lives in the United States. Companies that completed the survey represent a broad range of industries and are diverse in size.

The role of a HR/Benefits leader has never been more complex and demanding. The 2025 survey results highlight the challenges employers face. Based on the findings of this survey, the following emerged as top focus areas among employers.

– – Health care costs are expected to grow at the highest rate in a decade.Since 2022, the projected increase in health care trend, before plan design changes, rose from 6% in 2022 to almost 8% for 2025.
– – Pharmacy costs are largely responsible for overall increases and consume a growing share of the health care budget. Between 2021 and 2023, the median percentage of health care dollars spent on pharmacy has jumped from 21% to 27%, suggesting that nearly all of the health care cost increase noted above is related to pharmacy cost.
– – Employers are seeing cost pressures from GLP-1 medications (which regulates blood sugar, appetite, and digestion), which are considered a top driver of health care costs this year. Seventy-nine percent of employers have seen an increase in interest in obesity medications – including GLP-1s – among their covered members.
– – Managing and reassessing vendor partnerships are at the center of employers’ plans to address costs and improve performance. Employers are reassessing the quality and effectiveness of their partnerships and looking to integrate their benefits to reduce costs and simplify the member experience.
– – Cancer remains the top condition driving cost; however, more employers say that cardiovascular conditions are among their top three cost drivers.Concerns about the cost of cancer care may be further fueled by increased prevalence in younger populations. Furthermore, the growing cost of cancer treatments, including gene and cell therapies currently in the pipeline, leaves employers questioning how their plans will be impacted.
– – Protecting ERISA preemption is employers’ highest priority for the Administration and Congress.This finding reflects the importance of ERISA to employers, which allows them to offer their employees comprehensive benefits in a nationally consistent and competitive manner.
– – Mental health continues to be a priority for employers, with a focus on access and ways to eliminate cost barriers. Seventy-nine percent of employers say that access is one of their top three mental health priorities for 2025. To address access and costs, employers continue to pursue strategies, such as virtual counseling, eliminating out-of-network barriers and using on-site counselors.
– – Employers remain committed to health equity efforts that address disparities. Employers continue to pursue a number of targeted approaches to narrow health disparities within their plans and programs. Holistically, the most common tactic found in the survey is collaborating with employee resource groups (ERGs) to promote benefits and well-being initiatives to specific groups.

Business Group on Health CEO Ellen Kelsay expects employers to react by being more selective about the care that people receive. They also will try to manage the use of expensive treatments for obesity and diabetes.The CEO spoke recently with The Associated Press, and answered questions about implementation of expected strategies by employers.

CWCI Reports that the SAWW Increase Bumps California WC Benefits for 2025

California’s State Average Weekly Wage (SAWW) rose nearly 3.8 percent in the year ending March 31, 2024, which will result in an increase in California workers’ compensation temporary total disability (TTD) and permanent total disability (PTD) rates for 2025 work injury claims and other workers’ compensation benefits that are tied to SAWW increases.

The latest wage data from the U.S. Department of Labor show that California’s SAWW increased by 3.77588 percent from $1,642 in the first quarter of 2023 to $1,704 in the first quarter of 2024.

As a result, the TTD/PTD maximum rate, which stands at $1,619.15 per week for 2024 injuries, will increase by an additional $61.14 to $1,680.29 per week for claims with injury dates on or after January 1, 2025. State law also ties minimum weekly TTD/PTD rates to SAWW increases, so those minimums will rise by $9.17 from the current $242.86 per week to $252.03 per week for claims with 2025 injury dates. The California Division of Workers’ Compensation provided the new TTD/PTD rates for 2025 injury claims and plans to issue a Newsline announcing the new rates.

Also beginning on January 1, 2025, other workers’ compensation benefits, including TTD paid two years or more after injury, life pension and PTD payments for injuries on or after January 1, 2003, and installment payments on death claims will be going up due to the SAWW increase. Underpayment of benefits results in penalties, so CWCI encourages claims administrators to review changes in benefit rates with legal counsel to assure that adjustments are appropriate and accurate.

For reference, data tables showing the SAWW for the 12 months ending March 31, 2023 and for the 12 months ending March 31, 2024 are on the U.S. Department of Labor Unemployment Insurance web page. A CWCI Bulletin with more details is also available to Institute members and subscribers under the Communications tab at www.cwci.org.

Accounting Chief at Girardi Keese Law Firm Guilty of Stealing Client Money

The former longtime head of the accounting department at the now-shuttered Los Angeles plaintiffs’ personal injury law firm Girardi Keese pleaded guilty to enabling the embezzlement of tens millions of dollars from the firm’s injured clients and to embezzling money from Girardi Keese itself.

Christopher Kazuo Kamon, 51, formerly of Encino and Palos Verdes and who was residing in The Bahamas at the time of his November 2022 arrest, pleaded guilty to two counts of wire fraud.

According to his plea agreement, from 2004 until December 2020, Kamon was the head of the accounting department at Girardi Keese, a plaintiffs’ personal injury law firm based in downtown Los Angeles. In this position, Kamon worked closely with Thomas Vincent Girardi, 85, formerly a resident of Pasadena but who now resides in Seal Beach, as well as other senior lawyers at the law firm.

In December 2020, Girardi Keese’s creditors forced the once-prominent law firm into bankruptcy proceedings. The law firm dissolved in January 2021 and the State Bar of California disbarred Girardi in July 2022. On August 27, a federal jury in Los Angeles found Girardi guilty of four counts of wire fraud. Girardi’s sentencing hearing is scheduled for December 6.

In addition to supervising the law firm’s accounting department, Kamon oversaw facilitating payment of the law firm’s expenses. Kamon had a duty to keep accurate books and records of Girardi Keese, including accounting of money held in its attorney-client trust accounts. Typically, Girardi determined and directed which clients would be paid, how much they would be paid, when they would be paid, and signed all outgoing checks to clients. Kamon had signatory authority on additional Girardi Keese bank accounts.

From at least 2010 until December 2020, Girardi and Kamon schemed to defraud Girardi Keese clients out of their settlement money, using the misappropriated funds to pay the law firm’s payroll, the law firm’s credit card bills, and to pay Girardi and Kamon’s personal expenses.

Specifically, one victim – a Girardi Keese client who suffered severe burns all over his body when a natural gas pipeline exploded in San Bruno, California, in September 2010 – had a $53 million settlement negotiated. This deal was negotiated and agreed to without the client’s prior approval. Per the terms of the settlement, $25 million was invested into an annuity. The remaining $28 million was wired into a Girardi Keese client trust account in January 2013. Girardi, assisted by Kamon, misappropriated, and embezzled that client’s settlement money and used the funds to pay other Girardi Keese expenses and liabilities unrelated to this client, including payments to other law firm clients whose own settlement funds previously had been misappropriated by Girardi and others.

To prevent the victim from discovering Girardi’s embezzlement, Girardi lied to the client by saying the funds had been transferred into a separate interest-bearing account. In fact, no such transfers had been made and no such interest-bearing account containing these funds existed.

Girardi and Kamon sent lulling payments to the victim as purported “interest payments” deriving from the purported interest-bearing account. In July 2019, they sent the victim a $2.5 million check, purportedly as disbursement of the victim’s settlement funds. In fact, Girardi and Kamon knew these settlement proceeds belonged to other Girardi Keese clients. Girardi already had spent the victim’s settlement funds through disbursements unrelated to the victim’s case.

In a separate criminal case, Kamon admitted to running a years-long scheme in which he embezzled Girardi Keese funds for his personal enrichment. From at least 2013 to December 2020, Kamon utilized co-schemers to pose as “vendors” who were providing goods and services to the law firm. Kamon caused the supposed vendors to issue fraudulent invoices to Girardi Keese for goods and services that they purportedly provided to the law firm.

Kamon caused Girardi Keese to pay the amounts due on the fraudulent invoices. In fact, the law firm was paying the “vendors” for Kamon’s personal benefit, including for construction projects at his homes in Palos Verdes and Encino.

According to evidence presented at the recent trial of Tom Girardi, part of Kamon’s scheme involved payments to a female companion amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars, including a monthly stipend of $20,000, out of the Girardi Keese operating accounts despite the woman having no employment relationship with Girardi Keese.

United States District Judge Josephine L. Staton scheduled a January 31, 2025, sentencing hearing, at which time Kamon will face a statutory maximum sentence of 20 years in federal prison on each count. Kamon has been in federal custody since December 2022.

Kamon – along with Girardi and David R. Lira, Girardi’s son-in-law, and a former Girardi Keese lawyer – also faces federal fraud charges in Chicago. Trial in that case is scheduled for March 3, 2025.

IRS Criminal Investigation and the FBI investigated this matter.

Assistant United States Attorneys Ali Moghaddas of the Corporate and Securities Fraud Strike Force and Scott Paetty of the Major Frauds Section are prosecuting this case.

Fake Attorney and Associates Arrested for Insurance Fraud

Three Southern California residents were arrested after a joint investigation with the California Department of Insurance and the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office found one of the defendants allegedly posed as lawyer and the others as legal associates to file false insurance claims including bodily injury claims resulting from automobile collisions and property damage claims resulting from a wildfire event. The alleged fraud resulted in the ring collecting over $75,000.

The Department of Insurance is the state’s leader in preventing and stopping insurance fraud by investigating complaints involving those handling insurance claims or selling insurance to ensure they are acting in the best interest of consumers. The joint investigation began after a complaint alleged Pedram Sharokhi, 43, of Porter Ranch, also known as Peter Shah and Peter Sharokhi, was practicing law associated with personal injury claims without a proper license. Sharokhi also filed several property damage/smoke and ash claims on behalf the claimants, after the Saddleridge Fire.

The joint investigation found Sharokhi, who is not a licensed California attorney, was acting as a practicing attorney and on behalf of actual licensed attorneys without their knowledge. Using various legal entities Sharokhi, his wife, Shabnam Rahbar Vafaee, 37, of Porter Ranch, and associate Jimmy Swinder, 40, of Reseda, conspired together to commit multiple crimes, including insurance fraud, grand theft, identity theft, forgery, money laundering and unlawful practice of law to obtain insurance proceeds for personal gain. Neither Vafaee or Swinder are licensed attorneys. Swinder’s law license was suspended August 10, 2019, and is he not eligible to practice law in California. The National Insurance Crime Bureau also assisted with the investigation.

Sharokhi and his associates submitted bodily injury claims resulting from automobile collisions and property damage claims resulting from a wildfire event to multiple insurance companies through various legal entities. Sharokhi misrepresented himself as an attorney to his clients and the insurance companies by advertising, through business cards and office signage, which claimed they could provide legal services.

They submitted claims and demand packages for the claimants and then negotiated for the claims and submitted documents in support including letters of representation, demand packages, medical reports, medical invoices, and smoke cleaning estimates. The investigation discovered that many of the submitted documents were either falsified or had forged signatures. Sharokhi received settlement checks and deposited them into bank accounts that were accessible to him. Sharokhi and his associates illegally collected $75,460.

To orchestrate their scheme, Sharokhi and his associates employed licensed attorneys under the disguise that these hired attorneys only made court appearances or worked on drafts. The hired attorneys were under the impression that another licensed attorney handled the claims and was the attorney of record. Sharokhi and his associates then used that licensed attorney’s information to communicate, negotiate and settle claims. The licensed attorneys were unaware that Shah or his associates were using their identities without their consent.

The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office is prosecuting this case.

Twice Convicted David Fish Faces Third Fraud Case With QME Co-Defendant

A man banned for life from California’s workers’ compensation system after being twice convicted of workers’ compensation insurance fraud has been charged along with a San Diego-based neurosurgeon and two other co-conspirators in connection with billing nearly $100 million in fraudulent fees as part of an extensive workers’ compensation fraud scheme.

The charges follow a three-year investigation by the Orange County District Attorney’s Office into twice convicted felon David Wayne Fish who is accused of continuing to control clinics and providers who would see patients, refer them to specific providers in order to receive illegal referral payments, and then unlawfully bill workers’ compensation insurance companies for these services.

Fish, 55 of Laguna Niguel, Martin Brill, 78 of Los Angeles, and Robert Lee, 61 of Rancho Mirage, formed Southern California Injured Workers (SCIW), a management company which offered medical management services, including marketing, billing, and collections. Fish worked for the company as a “consultant,” but exercised complete control over the operation.

David Fish was convicted back in 2010, as part of Premier Medical Management, of Workers’ Compensation kick-back schemes and permanently suspended from participating in the California Workers’ Compensation System. He was convicted in Los Angeles County Superior Court in 2010 for receiving compensation or inducement for the referral of clients. Fish organized dozens of lawyers and doctors to steer more than 4,000 cases to preferred medical providers in order to run up high bills. Fish was ordered to pay $10,000 in restitution and approximately $390,000 in unpaid taxes.

In the current case, these three codefendants, along with San Diego neurosurgeon Dr. Vrijesh Tantuwaya – who is listed as a QME with five offices – also created a medical group called Injured Workers Medical Group (IWMG), which was the main client for SCIW. Dr. Tantuwaya was named the owner and CEO of this medical professional corporation.

The four co-defendants have been charged with 13 separate felony counts which include violations of Labor Code 3215 (referral of clients for compensation), Penal Code 182(a)(1) (conspiracy to commit a crime), Penal Code 549 (false and fraudulent claim) and Penal Code 550 (b)(3) (insurance fraud).

Using the medical group,Southern California Injured Workers he allegedly controlled patient referrals to a limited network of providers which contracted with SCIW to pay for the patient referrals. In three years, these defendants billed nearly $100 million dollars to numerous workers’ compensation insurance carriers, and were illegally paid referral fees from providers of services such as diagnostic testing and compound pharmacies.

“The Orange County District Attorney’s Office remains fiercely committed to prosecuting bad actors who exploit the workers’ compensation system to line their own pockets rather than helping injured workers,” said Orange County District Attorney Todd Spitzer. “At a time when families across America are struggling to keep up with increasing prices for everything from gas and rent to just being able to put food on the table for their families, criminals like these only increase the cost of insurance premiums and put the American dream just that much further out of reach for so many hardworking people. I am incredibly proud of the men and women of our Insurance Fraud team and their continued dedication to fighting for the rights of workers.”

According to the Coalition Against Insurance Fraud, insurance fraud is responsible for more than $308.6 billion in theft every year from American consumers. The California Department of Insurance reports that insurance fraud totals $17.2 billion each year and costs California residents an average of $440 a year through higher premiums, higher taxes, and higher prices. Investigating and prosecuting this fraud benefits all Californians.

If convicted, Fish faces maximum sentence of 18 years and four months in prison. Brill faces maximum of 12 years and four months in prison, Tantuwaya faces 13 years, four months in state prison and Lee faces 12 years and four months in prison.

Deputy Dstrict Attorney Kelly Albright of the Insurance Fraud Unit is prosecuting this case.

Researchers Say Drug Trials Funded by Manufacturers are “Massively” Biased

In many markets, consumers and policymakers have incomplete information on product effectiveness and quality. Consequently, firms often finance research on their own products. For example, automakers run fuel-economy tests for new vehicles, sunscreen manufacturers pay laboratories to test their products, and drug manufacturers often conduct clinical trials.

Clinical trials are a key component of pharmaceutical research and development. Trials are also expensive and risky investments. The average cost of a late-stage clinical trial is $35 million, an estimated 70% of trials are funded by industry, and the pharmaceuticals market in the United States alone is valued at $480 billion.

The results of trials shape regulatory, prescribing, and medical treatment decisions for decades afterward. For instance, trials have direct consequences for the health of the population, as seen by trials on the benefits of statins, the risks of hormone replacement therapy, and recent COVID-19 vaccines.

On one hand, firms’ research may have welfare benefits, as other parties can use the knowledge produced at minimal marginal cost. On the other hand, industry research may have specific, less relevant characteristics, and the knowledge produced may not be shared with the public. A new scientific paper written by Tama Oostrom, an assistant professor of economics at Ohio State University, published by the Journal of Political Economy measures how industry and financial incentives shape available evidence in the pharmaceutical market.

This paper quantifies how financial incentives affect the results of randomized control trials (RCTs) and specifically clinical trials. It also estimates the downstream consequences of financial incentives on trial characteristics and the availability of the research. The identification strategy uses the key insight that the exact same pairs of drugs can be tested in different RCTs conducted by parties with different financial interests.

The research method construct a novel dataset of psychiatric clinical trials where the exact same pairs of drugs are examined in trials with different sponsorship interests. And focused on antidepressants and antipsychotics due their market size as well as data availability.

As an example of the identifying variation, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals introduced a new antidepressant drug, Effexor, in 1993. Over the next decade and a half, Wyeth funded RCTs comparing the effectiveness of Effexor with Eli Lilly’s blockbuster drug Prozac. In 12 of the 14 trials funded solely by Wyeth, Effexor was more effective than Prozac. In contrast, only one of the three trials with alternate funding found Effexor to be more effective. Each of these trials is a double-blind RCT comparing the exact same two molecules and examining the same standard outcomes.

Her research analyzed the published papers of 509 trials and 1,215 treatment arms (groups of participants). Most of the trials were published after the drug gained approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). About three-quarters of them examined were for antidepressants, with the remaining quarter for antipsychotic medications.The study sample included 23 FDA-approved drugs and seven nonapproved drugs.

Ultimately the research found that a drug is reported to be 49% more effective when the trial is sponsored by that drug’s manufacturing or marketing firm, compared with the same drug evaluated against the same comparators but without the drug manufacturer’s or marketer’s involvement.

Sponsored drugs are also 43% more likely to report statistically significant improvements and 73% more likely to be the most effective drug in their trial, again, compared with the same molecule tested against the same pair of drugs but without funding from the drug’s manufacturer. The author refers to the main effect as a “sponsorship effect.”

The concluding comments by the author said that the “magnitude of the effect of funding on drug efficacy has substantial implications for drug approvals and prescriptions.”

The study confirms that the funding of studies greatly influences their design and results, Dr. Chad Savage, an internal medicine specialist and founder of YourChoice Direct Care, told The Epoch Times. “Multiple attempts have been made over the years to counter this effect, such as requiring financial disclosures from authors, but none have succeeded in fully eradicating the bias that can exist,” Savage said.

According to Dr. Peter C. Gøtzsche, professor of clinical research design and analysis at the University of Copenhagen, the bias in industry-sponsored trials is massive. “In head-to-head trials where Prozac was the drug of interest, significantly more patients improved on Prozac than in trials where Prozac was the comparator drug,” Gøtzsche told The Epoch Times.

Stanford Medicine Now Deploys 30 AI Tools for Diagnosis & Decision Making

Stanford Medicine leaders spotlighted innovation in artificial intelligence and reimagining cancer research and care as two of the academic health system’s key strategic priorities at the annual State of Stanford Medicine event on Oct. 1.

Appearing together before an in-person and virtual audience were Lloyd Minor, MD, the dean of the Stanford School of Medicine and vice president for medical affairs at Stanford University; David Entwistle, president and CEO of Stanford Health Care; and Paul King, president and CEO of Stanford Medicine Children’s Health. Together, they discussed their vision for the organization and what lies ahead – guided by a recently refreshed integrated strategic plan for Stanford Medicine through 2030.

Recognizing Stanford’s history as a pioneer in artificial intelligence, Stanford Medicine leaders aim to build on this legacy through responsible development and implementation of AI technologies in biomedical research, medical education and clinical care. Stanford Medicine has deployed more than 30 AI-powered applications to support clinicians in screening and diagnostics, monitoring patient conditions, predicting long-term outcomes, and informing decision-making.

In collaboration with technology companies, the health system also is pioneering the use of AI tools to support administrative work – such as creating first-draft responses to patient emails and drafting clinical notes through ambient listening technology. These tools have shown potential in reducing the clerical burden for clinicians, increasing their time with patients and improving their well-being.

As a founding partner of the Coalition for Health AI and through the RAISE Health initiative with the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, Stanford Medicine is leading the way in creating guidelines and guardrails to enhance the effectiveness of AI in health care and ensure that these powerful technologies are used for the benefit of all, Minor said.

“We have a real opportunity to enable or augment what we do with AI – that’s the part that I think is the most exciting,” Entwistle said. “How do we take this technology and build on the incredible clinical excellence that we already have? How do we get the right information in the right way in front of our clinicians at the right time? How do we use that technology to enable them to build on their excellence?”

With the number of cancer diagnoses worldwide increasing at a faster pace than most other diseases, Stanford Medicine is committed to continuing its leading role in addressing unmet needs through a bold vision to reimagine cancer innovation and care, the leaders said. Meeting this demand requires development of new cancer therapies, increased access to inpatient and outpatient care, specialized services leveraging advanced technologies, as well as clinical trials and cutting-edge treatment modalities.

Minor discussed Stanford Medicine’s vision to create a comprehensive, destination cancer center for adult and pediatric patients with a “bench-bedside-bench model” – bringing breakthroughs from labs to the patient care environment, then efficiently returning care insights back to scientists. Another priority is expanding access to Stanford Medicine’s world-class care, Entwistle said, citing the health system’s collaboration with Sutter Health to build an outpatient cancer center in Oakland.

“We cannot overstate the importance of cancer innovation and care at this moment in time,” King said. “Our vision is to build on Stanford Medicine’s rich legacy of groundbreaking discoveries, to translate them into the care we provide, and bringing insights from our clinics and our inpatient units back to our labs in that virtuous cycle.”

L.A. Pair Indicted for $54M Diagnostic Testing and Hospice Fraud

A Los Angeles woman and a San Fernando Valley man were arrestedon a 24-count federal grand jury indictment alleging a scheme to defraud Medicare out of more than $54 million via hospice and diagnostic testing services that were never provided and then laundered their illicit proceeds, including by buying millions of dollars’ worth of gold bars and coins.

Sophia Shaklian, 36, of the Larchmont area of Los Angeles, and Alex Alexsanian, 47, of Burbank, were arrested. They are scheduled to be arraigned in United States District Court in downtown Los Angeles.

Shaklian is charged with 16 counts of health care fraud and four counts of transactional money laundering. Alexsanian is charged with one count of conspiracy to launder monetary instruments and three counts of concealment money laundering.

According to the indictment that a federal grand jury returned on October 2, Shaklian, often using aliases, managed and submitted claims for seven health care providers enrolled with Medicare and located in Los Angeles County. These businesses included a hospice company she owned – the Pasadena-based Chateau d’Lumina Hospice and Palliative Care – and several diagnostic testing companies: Saint Gorge Radiology in Sylmar; Hope Diagnostics in North Hollywood; Direct Imaging & Diagnostics and Lab One – both located in Hollywood; and Labtech and Lifescan Diagnostics in Claremont.

From March 2019 to August 2024, these companies allegedly submitted more than $54 million in fraudulent claims to Medicare for services that were never provided and not needed. In total, they received more than $23 million for those claims. Shaklian allegedly laundered Medicare funds paid to Chateau by transferring them to accounts in the name of “Varsenic Babaian,” a synthetic or fake identity.

Alexsanian allegedly directed a foreign national to open Saint Gorge Radiology, and to acquire Medicare provider Console Hospice in Van Nuys, and then provide control of those companies and their bank accounts and the foreign national’s personal bank accounts to Alexsanian.

Alexsanian conspired with the foreign national (who soon left the country) and others to have Saint Gorge Radiology and Console Hospice submit fraudulent claims to Medicare for services not provided and then laundered the Medicare reimbursements they received, as well as funds deposited into their accounts through the “Babaian” identity, and used them to, among other things, buy more than $6 million in gold bars and coins.

If convicted of all charges, Shaklian would face a statutory maximum sentence of 10 years in federal prison for each health care fraud count and up to 20 years in federal prison for each money laundering count. Alexsanian would face up to 20 years in federal prison for each count.

The United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General and the FBI are investigating this matter.

Assistant United States Attorney Kristen A. Williams of the Major Frauds Section is prosecuting this case.

An indictment contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime.  Every defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.