Menu Close

Tag: 2019 News

Startup Disrupts Pharmacy Business Model

A team of Internet entrepreneurs in downtown Manhattan wants to revolutionize how Americans get prescription drugs. Their company, Blink Health, has a crazy idea: let customers shop for the best deal. The founders of Blink Health seek to eliminate the middlemen and comparison-shop at their website to see if you can get a better deal than what’s being offered by and insurance plan or the drugstore.

Blink Health claims that the pharmacy business remains largely untouched because customers haven’t easily been able to shop online for a better price. They’re buying drugs the way they bought them in the predigital age – at the drugstore. The middlemen still flourish, at the expense of everyone else..

The dominant middlemen are the pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs, which are hired by private and government health-insurance plans to administer drug benefits. Dozens of small PBMs once competed for business, but today three large firms – Express Scripts, CVS Caremark, and OptumRx – together control more than 75 percent of the market.

While other twentysomethings were launching Internet startups, Geoffrey Chaiken was wondering why there was no Uber or Airbnb in the pharmacy industry. After dropping out of Yale to start a company developing epilepsy drugs, he began studying the industry’s supply chain.

Together with his younger brother, Matthew, he started Blink Health in his downtown apartment four years ago. Today, it has 600,000 customers and an office in SoHo with 220 employees. To help them run the company, the Chaikens brought in veterans of online companies like Kayak as well as the drug industry, including Bill Doyle, who’d spent decades working for Johnson & Johnson.

Blink negotiates with drug manufacturers, using its purchasing power to extract discounts off the list price. Then, instead of collecting secret rebates or steering patients to a preferred drug, it posts all the discounted prices on its website (and makes money by charging the patient slightly more than it reimburses the pharmacy). Instead of forcing patients to turn over their prescription to a pharmacist to find out what it will cost, Blink lets doctors and patients shop on the web before making a commitment.

For example, a month’s supply for the generic version of Lipitor (atorvastatin) would typically cost more than $100 at CVS and more than $200 at Walgreens. The generic version of Crestor (rosuvastatin) would cost more than $175 at either chain. If your plan covered the Lipitor but not the Crestor generic, you might spend between $5 and $40 for the Lipitor, but you’d have to pay the full $175 for the Crestor – so you might not buy it, even though it would be the better option for you.

At Blink’s website, you can typically find the Lipitor generic priced under $9 and the Crestor under $12. If you buy it from Blink, you can get it delivered to your home or pick it up at a local drugstore. Independent pharmacies have been eager to work with Blink because it’s simpler and more profitable than dealing with insurance plans.

Blink makes straightforward payments for the drugs and doesn’t impose complicated contracts (or gag clauses). The PBMs often pay less, and they impose various fees, like charging pharmacists $5 if they call their help desk to deal with a prescription. The PBMs can decide months after a transaction that the pharmacy must give back part of the reimbursement—a retroactive penalty called a “clawback”—which can cause the pharmacy to lose money on the prescription.

Blink Health has shown that the same market forces that liberated airlines and their passengers can liberate drugmakers and patients. These forces could transform the rest of the health-care industry. The prices of most medical procedures and hospital stays are as complex and opaque as they are for prescription drugs. The prices are known, again, only to the middlemen, so it’s not surprising that costs keep rising.

WC Drug Costs and Utilization Improved in 2018

Overall drug cost and utilization were both down for workers’ comp payers in 2018. Combined with tighter regulatory control, this trend helped to reduce drug spend by nearly 4% over 2017.

That’s the key takeaway from myMatrixx’s 2018 Workers’ Compensation Drug Trend Report, which highlighted the industry’s progress toward decreasing reliance on opioids and better managing prescription authorization.

But though the overall outlook is positive for payers, some troubling trends are taking shape. Brand-name versions of the most common drugs prescribed to injured workers are 65% more expensive today than they were in 2014. Generics, on the other hand, have dropped 35% in price over the same time period. Across all myMatrixx payers, 86% of prescriptions filled were generic versions.

Together, lower prices and higher utilization of generics have driven an overall 0.9% reduction in unit costs.

Between 2019 and 2022, a number of brand name drugs will also lose patent protection, opening the door for manufacturers to bring more generic versions to market. Nine of these are indicted for pain and inflammation, and thus represent potential new alternatives to opioids as payers shift away from addictive painkillers.

Average opioid spending among myMatrixx payers has dropped by 15%, thanks to broad efforts at prescriber education and more aggressive prescription management. In 2017, 21% of injured workers used an opioid for at least 30 days. In 2018, that rate dropped to 17.6%.

Utilization among both NSAIDS and gabapentin – another non-opioid alternative – increased slightly, suggesting that prescribers are beginning to favor these non-addictive pain management drugs over opioids.

The use of compounds has been significantly curtailed to the point where they are nearly extinct in the world of workers’ comp. Utilization has decreased 24% since 2017, driving a 43% reduction in spending. In 2018, only 0.2% of medications were compound creams.

“We’ve pretty much eliminated compound creams from the picture,” said Rochelle Henderson, PhD & VP of Clinical Research at Express Scripts. “That being said, dermatologicals are growing as a category, and they will be an area to watch going forward.”

Diabetic Drug Greatly Reduces Fibromyalgia Pain

Researchers led by a team from The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston were able to dramatically reduce the pain of fibromyalgia patients with medication that targeted insulin resistance.

This discovery could dramatically alter the way that some forms of chronic pain can be identified and managed. Dr. Miguel Pappolla, UTMB professor of neurology, said that although the discovery is very preliminary, it may lead to a revolutionary shift on how fibromyalgia and related forms of chronic pain are treated. The new approach has the potential to save billions of dollars to the health care system and decrease many peoples’ dependence on opiates for pain management.

The UTMB team of researchers, along with collaborators from across the U.S., including the National Institutes of Health, were able for the first time, to separate patients with fibromyalgia from normal individuals using a common blood test for insulin resistance, or pre-diabetes. They then treated the fibromyalgia patients with a medication targeting insulin resistance, which dramatically reduced their pain levels. The study was recently published in PlosOne.

Fibromyalgia is one of the most common conditions causing chronic pain and disability. The global economic impact of fibromyalgia is enormous – in the U.S. alone and related health care costs are about $100 billion each year. Despite extensive research the cause of fibromyalgia is unknown, so there’s no specific diagnostics or therapies for this condition other than pain-reducing drugs.

“Earlier studies discovered that insulin resistance causes dysfunction within the brain’s small blood vessels. Since this issue is also present in fibromyalgia, we investigated whether insulin resistance is the missing link in this disorder,” Pappolla said. “We showed that most – if not all – patients with fibromyalgia can be identified by their A1c levels, which reflects average blood sugar levels over the past two to three months.”

Pre-diabetics with slightly elevated A1c values carry a higher risk of developing central (brain) pain, a hallmark of fibromyalgia and other chronic pain disorders.

The researchers identified patients who were referred to a subspecialty pain medicine clinic to be treated for widespread muscular/connective tissue pain. All patients who met the criteria for fibromyalgia were separated into smaller groups by age. When compared with age-matched controls, the A1c levels of the fibromyalgia patients were significantly higher.

“Considering the extensive research on fibromyalgia, we were puzzled that prior studies had overlooked this simple connection,” said Pappolla. “The main reason for this oversight is that about half of fibromyalgia patients have A1c values currently considered within the normal range. However, this is the first study to analyze these levels normalized for the person’s age, as optimal A1c levels do vary throughout life. Adjustment for the patients’ age was critical in highlighting the differences between patients and control subjects.”

For the fibromyalgia patients, metformin, a drug developed to combat insulin resistance was added to their current medications. They showed dramatic reductions in their pain levels.

Other authors include UTMB’s Clark Andersen and Xiang Fang as well as Laxmaiah Manchikanti from Louisiana State University School of Medicine Health Sciences Center; Nigel Greig from the National Institutes of Health; Fawad Ahmed from St. Michael’s Pain & Spine Clinics; Michael Seffinger from the College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific and Andrea Trescot from the Pain and Headache Center in Eagle River, Alaska.  

LAPD Officer Charged with Comp Fraud

The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office announced that a Los Angeles Police Department officer has been charged with workers’ compensation fraud.

Mario Jacinto (dob 8/6/78) of Diamond Bar faces four counts of workers’ compensation insurance fraud and one count of attempted perjury under oath, all felonies, in case BA477808. Jacinto, described as an “Officer III,” is a 16-year veteran of the force and is assigned to Newton Area, Los Angeles Police Department officials said.

The case was filed for arrest warrant on May 15 and the defendant was arrested. Jacinto was released after posting $50,000 bail.

Jacinto is accused of misrepresenting the extent of his job-related injuries for which he was receiving disability benefits.From October 2018 through January,he allegedly engaged in activities that were inconsistent with his work-related claims, said Deputy District Attorney Arunas Sodonis of the Healthcare Fraud Division.

While under oath during a deposition, Jacinto claimed he had not participate in martial arts classes after being injured, but according to the complaint, those claims were false.

A complaint against officer Mario Jacinto, 40, said he “falsely claimed he had not participated in martial arts classes since the date of his injury,” said Paul Eakins, a spokesman for the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office, in an email to McClatchy.

Jacinto faces a possible maximum sentenceof eight years and eight months in state prison if convicted as charged. The prosecutor is requesting that bail be set at $40,000.The case remains under investigation by the LAPD, Special Operations Division.

Insurance Agent Allegedly Steals Premiums

Insurance agent Francis Okyere, 67, self-surrendered yesterday at the Los Angeles County Superior Court after being charged with four felony counts of grand theft.

The charges arose from an investigation by the Department of Insurance’s Investigation Division, Valencia Regional Office, into multiple complaints filed by clients of Okyere alleging that their insurance policies were canceled despite paying Okyere for the coverage.

The investigation revealed that, between July 2015 and September 2016, Okyere misappropriated at least $65,456 in insurance premiums payments from four small business owners and used those funds for his personal benefit.

Okyere’s actions left the business owners uninsured against potential liability and workers compensation claims.

Okyere will be arraigned on July 11, 2019 and bail was set at $30,000. The case is being prosecuted by the Healthcare Fraud Division of the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office.

The Department of Insurance Legal Division filed an Accusation against Okyere on December 18, 2018 and is seeking to revoke his insurance license. If anyone has information on this investigation, we urge them to call the department at 661-253-7500.

Jurisdiction Over Home Health Care Limited to UR/IMR

Maxine Wiggs was injured while working for Allied Signal Aerospace. Wiggs had six surgeries from 1998 through 2012. By the time of her surgery in 2012, Wiggs was on multiple opioid and narcotic medications for pain management. Wiggs had three more surgeries from 2014 through 2017.

A dispute arose over home health care services. The parties stipulated in 2012, that Irene Mefford was the agreed registered nurse to perform a home assessment for housekeeping services. Mefford was to prepare a report, which should be sent to Wiggs’ doctors for review and comment;

Mefford’s report, issued on February 11, 2013, recommended Wiggs be provided with housekeeping services two times a month (approximately four hours per visit) for the purposes of housecleaning duties for the duration of one year. The employer authorized home care for one year and also paid for retroactive home care in the amount of $5,507.

On March 7, 2014, Wiggs’s primary treating physician submitted an RFA for home care. Allied’s UR authorized home care on March 14, 2014. The authorization was for four hours twice a month for deep cleaning assistance.

As a result of Wiggs’s additional surgeries, on June 18, 2015, Wigg’s physician requested authorization for four hours of house cleaning every week. Allied’s UR denied authorization for increased house cleaning home care. Wiggs did not seek an IMR of the UR denial. The record includes multiple RFAs included within progress reports of Wiggs’s doctors for four hours of house cleaning per week. The most recent RFA for four hours of home health care per week was submitted on April 6, 2016.

Wiggs thereafter filed for an expedited hearing on the issue. Wiggs argued that Allied’s failure to submit the April 6, 2016 RFA for home health care to the UR process had the effect of entitling her to home care. Allied argued that the April 6, 2016 RFA was identical to an earlier denied RFA, which could not be asserted without any change in circumstance in Wiggs’s condition. Neither Wiggs nor Allied at this point raised an ongoing stipulation to utilize Mefford for any disputes arising out of home health care.

The WCJ ordered Allied to serve Mefford with Wiggs’s medical reports from March 10, 2012 through October 19, 2016. The WCJ ordered Mefford to prepare a supplemental report after review of the medical records, a home assessment, and interview with Wiggs. The report was to address whether as a result of her industrial injuries, Wiggs was in need of heavy home health care.

A majority of the appeals board affirmed the WCJ’s decision to develop the record and incorporated and adopted the WCJ’s opinion and report. However the court of appeal reversed in the unpublished case of Allied Signal Aerospace v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd.

The court of appeal ruled that “the issue of home health care for Wiggs is an issue to be resolved in and by the UR process, not the WCJ or the appeals board. … the WCJ and appeals board do not have jurisdiction to address and resolve the issue of home health care for Wiggs.”

Opioid Crisis Spreads to Canada and Europe

The Organisation for European Economic Cooperation (OEEC) was established in 1948. Other countries joined in, starting with Japan in 1964. Today, 36 OECD member countries worldwide identify problems, discuss and analyse them, and promote policies to solve them.

The OECD has just reported that opioid use has reached crisis proportions not only in the United States but also in Canada and some European countries, as prescription opioid painkillers have become much more common.

“The United States is by no means alone in facing this crisis,” the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development said in its report. The Paris-based policy forum said deaths linked to opioid use were also rising sharply in Sweden, Norway, Ireland, and England and Wales.

Ilicit opioids constitute a significant product of international illicit trade. Heroin is a semi-synthetic opiate synthesised from morphine and is the most prevalent illicit opioid worldwide. Approximately twice as potent as morphine, heroin has a high potential for problematic use. In recent years, fentanyl and fentanyl analogues have become much more prominent in the illicit drugs scene in many countries.

The majority of those who die in Europe are men, accounting for 3 out of 4 deaths. However, in the United States, opioid use has been rising among pregnant women, particularly among those on low incomes. Having a mental health disorder was also associated with a two-fold greater use of prescription opioids in the US.

An increase in prescription and over-prescription of opioids for pain management is among the factors driving the crisis. Governments should review industry regulations to ensure they protect people from harm as, since the late 1990s, manufacturers have consistently downplayed the problematic effect of opioids.

Doctors should improve their prescribing practices, for instance through evidence-based clinical guidelines and increased surveillance of opioid prescriptions. Governments can also regulate marketing and financial relationships with opioid manufacturers. Coverage for long-term medication-assisted therapy, such as methadone and buprenorphine, should be expanded.

Strengthening the integration of health and social services, such as unemployment and housing support, and criminal justice systems would help improve treatment for people with Opioid Use Disorder.

Findings in WCAB Psyche Case Binding in FEHA Claim

Interim Incorporated provides housing and related services to adults with mental health disabilities. Interim hired Tommie Fields, an African-American man, as a counselor in 1989. During his 22-year career with Interim, he was one of the few African-American male counselors or employees.

Fields brought a worker’s compensation claim for psychiatric injuries. At the hearing, Interim argued that its decision to terminate Fields’s employment was “a nondiscriminatory, good faith personnel action” under Labor Code section 3208.3, subdivision (h), and thus Fields was not entitled to any benefits for his injuries.

The WCJ rejected this argument and found that Interim’s termination of Fields’s employment “was not a good faith personnel action; had the termination been a good faith personnel action it would not have met the . . . threshold necessary to bar the injury claim.”

Interim filed a petition for reconsideration with the Worker’s Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) in which it argued that there was insufficient evidence to support the order. Reconsideration was denied.

Fields also brought a wrongful termination civil action against Interim Incorporated based on allegations of racial discrimination, harassment, and retaliation pursuant to the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.).

The jury found in favor of Interim on the FEHA and wrongful discharge causes of action. However, the jury found in favor of Fields on his intentional infliction of emotional distress cause of action and awarded him $2 million in damages. The trial court later granted Interim’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

On appeal, Fields contends that the trial court erred when it concluded that Interim was not collaterally estopped from presenting evidence of its nondiscriminatory, good faith personnel action. The Court of Appeal agreed and reverse the judgment in the unpublished case of Fields v Interim Incorporated.

The doctrine of collateral estoppel bars relitigation of an issue that has been decided in a former proceeding, including a worker’s compensation proceeding.

An employer, who has failed to establish that the employee’s psychiatric injuries were substantially caused by its lawful, nondiscriminatory, good faith personnel action in a worker’s compensation proceeding, cannot establish that its adverse employment action was based upon legitimate, nondiscriminatory factors under FEHA. Thus, one of the issues in the WCAB proceeding was identical to the issue at trial, that is, whether Interim’s termination of Fields’s employment was lawful and nondiscriminatory.

Comp 83% Combined Ratio Lowest Since 1930s

NCCI’s Chief Actuary Kathy Antonello, FCAS, FSA, MAAA, delivered the company’s highly anticipated State of the Line Report, which provided the audience with a detailed description of 2018 industry results, market indicators, and trends.

The workers compensation Calendar Year 2018 combined ratio for private carriers was 83%. This is the fifth consecutive year that the workers compensation line of business has posted an underwriting gain. Total market net written premium volume increased to $48.6 billion in 2018.

The Calendar Year 2018 workers compensation combined ratio of 83 is the lowest on record since the 1930s. The industry’s favorable combined ratio results over the last several years has been primarily driven by notable improvement in the underlying loss ratios. Underwriting discipline appears to have contributed to these results in what seems to be a perpetual low interest rate environment, with low investment returns.

The combined ratio is typically expressed as a percentage. A ratio below 100 percent indicates that the company is making an underwriting profit, while a ratio above 100 percent means that it is paying out more money in claims that it is receiving from premiums.

On an accident-year basis, the industry-reported 2018 workers compensation combined ratio was 97%. NCCI expects this accident year’s combined ratio to develop favorably over time.

Other market indicators and trends highlighted in NCCI’s 2019 State of the Line Report included:

— NCCI estimates that as of Year-End 2018, the overall reserve position for private carriers is a $5 billion redundancy. A redundant workers compensation reserve position has not been observed in at least 25 years.
— On a preliminary basis, average lost-time claim frequency across NCCI states declined by 1% in 2018.
— In NCCI states, the preliminary 2018 average indemnity accident year claim severity increased by 3% relative to the corresponding 2017 value. Medical lost-time claim severity increased by 1%.
— The workers compensation Residual Market Pool premium volume was approximately $1 billion during 2018, representing a residual market share of about 7%.

USDOL Opposes ABC Employment Test

In a major positive development for gig economy businesses, the U.S. Department of Labor issued an opinion letter confirming that certain workers providing work for a virtual marketplace company are, indeed, independent contractors.

While this letter can only be used as an authoritative legal defense by the specific (unnamed) gig economy business that requested the letter, this publication still provides the federal government’s official interpretation on whether a certain business model or practice complies with the law.

The agency applied its longstanding and unchanged six-factor balancing test, derived from Supreme Court precedent, to determine whether the workers are economically independent (leading to a finding of contractor status) or economically dependent (leading to an employee finding) in the working relationship with the entity in question. The six factors are as follows:

1) The nature and degree of the potential employer’s control.
2) The permanency of the worker’s relationship with the potential employer.
3) The amount of the worker’s investment in facilities, equipment, or helpers.
4) The amount of skill, initiative, judgment, or foresight required for the worker’s services.
5) The worker’s opportunities for profit or loss.
6) The extent of integration of the worker’s services into the potential employer’s business.

In the announcement accompanying the publication of the letter, the USDOL confirmed that the opinion letter was an official, written opinion by the Department’s Wage and Hour Division on how the FLSA applies in the specific circumstances presented by the entity that requested the letter.

“An important role of the U.S. Department of Labor is to ensure that employers who want to do the right thing have clear compliance assistance,” said Keith Sonderling, Acting Administrator of the Department’s Wage and Hour Division. “Today, the U.S. Department of Labor offers further insight into the nexus of current labor law and innovations in the job market.”