Menu Close

Tag: 2019 News

Truck Driver Pleads Guilty to Comp Fraud

The Ventura County District Attorney announced that Jaime Serna (DOB 1/29/1972), formerly of Fillmore, pied guilty to a felony violation of Insurance Code section 1871.4(a)(l)-making a fraudulent statement of a material fact for the purpose of obtaining workers’ compensation benefits.

Serna was employed by Agromin in Santa Paula as a truck driver and injured his right shoulder on May 12, 2010. He was placed off work on temporary total disability and had shoulder surgery on September 10, 2010. He remained off work and continued to collect temporary total disability benefits of two-thirds of his salary, tax free.

On February 12, 2012, Agromin received a tip that Serna was working on cars and engaging in physical activities that contradicted his claimed physical limitations.

Agromin notified their workers’ compensation insurance administrator, who retained private investigators to conduct surveillance of Serna.

Investigators obtained seven and a half hours of surveillance video of Serna working on cars at his residence. He was seen removing a radiator from the engine compartment, removing and replacing batteries and the wheels and tires of the vehicle. He picked up a 36-pound floor jack with his right arm and carried it into his garage.

On July 12, 2012, Serna gave a deposition and lied under oath about his injuries. He stated he could not do anything at home and said the heaviest thing he could carry was one gallon of milk. He denied working on cars and said he was not even able to change the spark plugs on his vehicle.

Serna will be sentenced in courtroom 12 of the Ventura Superior Court, County of Ventura, on July 16, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. He faces a maximum of five years in jail.

School Custodian Sentenced for Fraud

The Ventura County District Attorney announced that Garrett Moore (DOB 12/26/1983), of Simi Valley, was sentenced after pleading guilty to a felony violation of Penal Code section 550(b )(1 )- making a fraudulent statement of a material fact for the purpose of obtaining workers’ compensation benefits.

Moore was placed on summary probation for a period of 36 months and was ordered to serve 90 days in the Ventura County jail.

The offense was reduced to a misdemeanor by the court because Moore had previously made restitution in full to victim insurance company, York Risk Services, in the amount of $24,000.

Moore was employed as a custodian for the Simi Valley Unified School District and injured his right shoulder on December 4, 2017.

He was placed off work on temporary total disability and began receiving medical treatment. York Risk Services learned that Moore owned a carpet cleaning business, but Moore told them he had no active role in the business and all the physical labor was performed by his father and son.

York retained private investigators who obtained surveillance video of Moore using both arms to carry hoses, pushing a large pressure washer up and down ramps, and moving large pieces of furniture and appliances. When he was interviewed by investigators, Moore denied doing any kind of strenuous physical activity.

“ABC” Test “Doomsday Scenario” for Hollywood

The state legislature is considering a proposal that takes aim at Uber, Lyft and others using independent contractors by adopting the “ABC” employment test – but it could render the entertainment industry’s tax-lucrative loan-out companies useless.

The Hollywood Reporter magazine claims that Hollywood studio executives may be in for a shock when it comes to their budgets. A bill winding through California’s legislature that takes aim at gig-fueled companies like Uber and Postmates may upend long-standing showbiz practices by reclassifying scores of independent contractors as employees, and could render tax-lucrative loan-out companies useless.

The bill, AB 5, which the state assembly passed May 29, is designed to protect workers from being misclassified as independent contractors and therefore denied such employee protections as minimum wage, overtime pay and workers’ compensation. It seeks to codify and expand the California Supreme Court’s 2018 Dynamex decision, and would presume every worker is an employee – with a few exceptions for people like barbers and real estate agents – unless a company can show that the worker meets three criteria under the so-called ABC Test.

The requirement that makes Hollywood nervous is that the independent contractor must perform duties outside the usual course of the company’s business. “That test will necessarily lock talent out of being an independent contractor if it passes in its current form,” says talent lawyer Rick Genow, whose clients include Debra Messing, Anthony Anderson and Henry Golding. “The economic impact would be somewhat devastating to both talent and the studios.

A doomsday scenario for Hollywood would look like this: A law is enacted with no exemption for entertainment workers; companies opt to treat everyone as employees for all purposes to avoid complications; and loan-outs are effectively dead in the water.

It’s often financially beneficial for talent to form their own corporation, and then that company loans out their services to other employers instead of those employers hiring them directly. Adds business manager Harley Neuman, who represents Ellen DeGeneres and Scarlett Johansson: “It would be catastrophic to our business if loan-outs went away.

It’s unclear how much this bill would cost the entertainment business in total, but the state of California estimates it loses out on $7 billion in payroll tax revenue each year because of alleged misclassification across all industries. Economist Chris Thornberg of Beacon Economics says the bill aims to solve a problem that’s been overblown. “California’s economy has the lowest unemployment rate it has ever had,” he says. “People have options, and they’re still choosing to drive Uber or Lyft. The idea these people are being exploited and need help just doesn’t fly.” He expects film and TV productions would either leave the state or find ways to cut costs.

The language of the bill isn’t final, so some of the potential negative impacts could be avoided through amendments. The deadline to pass legislation before sending it to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk is Sept. 13.

Sale of Applied Underwriters to Close in 2019

The Insurance Journal reports that a possible sale of workers’ compensation specialist Applied Underwriters looks to be a step closer to reality. The California Department of Insurance is reviewing an application for the sale of the Calif.-based Berkshire Hathaway subsidiary. CDI officials confirmed with Insurance Journal on Tuesday that an application from Applied is under review internally.

“Once the application is determined complete, portions of the file will be public and available to be shared,” said CDI spokeswoman Nancy Goldberg.

A person familiar with Applied and the process of selling the company said similar applications have been submitted to insurance departments in other states where it’s required to do so. “I can confirm an application is being reviewed by the various state regulatory bodies,” said the person, who asked not to be named.

An Applied spokesperson said the company would not be commenting during the application process.

The effort to sell Applied appears to have started earlier this year due to a channel conflict. That was made known when Berkshire Hathaway Chairman Warren Buffett told CNBC that Applied is a smaller firm that has to compete against two larger insurance companies Berkshire owns that also sell workers’ comp coverage. Applied provides workers’ comp and services to small and medium-sized enterprises.

Jeffrey Silver, Applied Underwriters’ general counsel, confirmed the reason with Insurance Journal in February, while also noting that Berkshire has doubled its own workers’ compensation writings, excluding Applied Underwriters, since 2012.

“This sale will eliminate that inherent competition that occurred between the Berkshire-owned entities,” Silver said at that time.  He also said the sale was expected to close in the third quarter but offered no information on a buyer or buyers.

Applied ran afoul of the CDI two years ago, reaching a settlement agreement in June 2017 over “bait and switch marketing tactics,” according to a statement from the state’s insurance commissioner at the time.

Berkshire Hathaway acquired Applied in May 2006, and currently owns roughly 81 percent of the company. Founded in 1994 by Sidney R. Ferenc and Steven Menzies, Applied Underwriters is headquartered in Foster City, California and has an operations center in Omaha, Nebraska.

Santa Ana Psychiatrist to Serve 57 Months in Prison

A psychiatrist who practiced at a Santa Ana clinic has been sentenced to 57 months in federal prison for issuing prescriptions for dangerous and addictive narcotics, such as the opioid oxycodone, without a medical purpose, to a drug dealer in exchange for cash, knowing the drugs would be sold on the street.

Dr. Robert Tinoco Perez, 57, of Westminster, was sentenced by United States District Judge Andrew J. Guilford. Perez pleaded guilty on February 25 to one felony count of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances.

Perez was a 1994 graduate of the University of California, Irvine College of Medicine. He was licensed as a physician and surgeon in California on November 2. 1994. On May 1, 2019 the Medical Board accepted the surrender of his license, and he is no longer licensed in California. At the time disciplinary charges were pending against Perez for alleged sexual exploitation and sexual misconduct with a patient, among other charges.

Perez wrote prescriptions for “patients” he had never met or examined, including an undercover officer. Perez also created fictitious medical records for drug customers to provide justification for their prescriptions.

Perez used bogus patient names to write the fraudulent prescriptions to co-defendant William Jason Plumley, 41, of Huntington Beach, who sold the prescribed drugs – and also heroin and methamphetamine – to an undercover law enforcement officer. Plumley now is serving a 70-month federal prison sentence for selling prescriptions written by Perez as well as the drugs filled from Perez’s prescriptions. Plumley pleaded guilty in October 2018 to one count of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances.

The drugs prescribed illegally by Perez included oxycodone and hydrocodone (both opioid pain medications), amphetamine salts (sold primarily under the brand name Adderall), and alprazolam (sold primarily under the brand name Xanax).

Perez admitted in his plea agreement that between December 2017 and January 2018, he wrote prescriptions for fictitious patients for 240 pills of Adderall, 300 pills of Roxicodone (oxycodone), and 250 pills of Norco (hydrocodone). Perez sold the prescriptions to Plumley for at least $1,400, according to Perez’s plea agreement.

This case is part of Operation Hypocritical Oath, a series of investigations led by the Drug Enforcement Administration targeting medical professionals with criminal charges, search warrants, and administrative actions that have led to the revocation of DEA licenses.

This case is the result of an investigation by the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Costa Mesa Police Department. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Rosalind Wang of the Santa Ana Branch Office.

Solar Company Cited for Worker’s Fall from Roof

Cal/OSHA has cited an Anaheim solar panel installation company $193,905 for multiple serious workplace safety hazards including one willful serious accident-related violation, following an investigation of a worker who was seriously injured after they fell from the roof of an Oakland home. Cal/OSHA determined that Nexus Energy Systems, Inc. did not provide required fall protection for their workers.

On December 6, three installers were working to install solar panels at the Oakland residence when one of the workers lost his footing and fell 15 feet onto the concrete driveway, suffering a broken wrist and jaw. None of the workers were wearing fall protection.

Falls from roofs are often deadly, and that is why employers must protect their employees from fall hazards and provide effective training,” said Cal/OSHA Deputy Chief of Enforcement Debra Lee. “This employer was aware of these dangers and ignored its responsibility to address them.” Cal/OSHA cited Nexus Energy Systems for five violations, three of which were related to the December accident. The violations include:

— A willful serious accident-related violation as the employer failed to provide fall protection.
— Two serious violations for the employer’s failure to provide training and ensure compliance with fall protection measures.
— Two general violations for the employer’s failure to implement an effective heat illness protection plan and an injury and illness prevention program that identifies and corrects hazards specific to the worksite.

Cal/OSHA also cited the employer for two additional violations stemming from an incident that investigators learned had taken place the previous September, when a worker suffered electrical burns while connecting solar panels to an energized breaker box. Cal/OSHA noted one serious continuing violation for failing to provide insulated gloves or tools while working on energized equipment, and a general violation for the employer’s failure to investigate the industrial accident and take measures to correct safety hazards.

A violation is classified as serious when there is a realistic possibility that death or serious harm could result from the actual hazard created by the violation, and violations are classified as accident-related when the injury, illness or fatality is caused by the violation. A willful violation is cited when the employer is aware of the law and violates it nevertheless, or when the employer is aware of the hazardous condition and takes no reasonable steps to address it.

All employers in California are required to have an effective written injury and illness prevention program, a safety program to identify, assess and control hazards in the workplace. Cal/OSHA has online tools and publications to guide employers on how to establish an effective safety program. Cal/OSHA’s resources on fall protection include a safety and health factsheet, residential fall protection training and a construction safety pocket guide.

FDA Launches Pilot Blockchain Technology Project

IBM, Merck and Walmart have been chosen for a U.S. Food and Drug Administration pilot program that will explore using blockchain technology to improve the security of prescription drug supply and distribution.

The companies said they would work with consultancy KPMG to create a shared blockchain network that will allow real-time monitoring of products in the pharmaceutical supply chain.

The project has been authorized under the U.S. Drug Supply Chain Security Act. DQSA, was enacted by Congress on November 27, 2013. Title II of DQSA outlines steps to build an electronic, interoperable system to identify and trace certain prescription drugs as they are distributed in the United States.

The act was passed to improve FDA’s ability to help protect consumers from exposure to drugs that may be counterfeit, stolen, contaminated, or otherwise harmful. The system will also improve detection and removal of potentially dangerous drugs from the drug supply chain to protect U.S. consumers.

Additionally, the DSCSA directs FDA to establish national licensure standards for wholesale distributors and third-party logistics providers, and requires these entities report licensure and other information to FDA annually.

The FDA has previously used the DSCSA to issue a warning letter to drug distributor McKesson Corp for violations involving opioid medications.

The new project is aimed at reducing the time needed to track and trace prescription drugs, improving access to reliable distribution information and ensuring products are handled appropriately and stored at the right temperature while being distributed, the companies said in a statement.

Blockchain technology, originally conceived a decade ago as the basis for the cryptocurrency bitcoin, will help stakeholders establish a permanent record and can be integrated with existing systems used to trace products while they are distributed.

The project is scheduled to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2019 and results will be published in a report, the companies said.

Arrests Made for $120M Fake Insurance Scheme

Georgia insurance agents said they busted a $120 million Ponzi scheme which preyed on California farm workers. Three people were arrested during the bust.

Agents surprised Wesley Bernard Owens, 47, of Suwanee, and Beau Eric Wilson, 34, of Gainesville, before they got up in a pre-dawn raid at their individual upscale homes.

Owens is the CEO of three Gwinnett County businesses including Bison Data Systems. A search warrant was issued in May of 2017 at all three businesses in conjunction with the California Department of Insurance.

State officials worked on the case for two long years. Officials said the men were responsible for creating fake certificates of insurance, declaring that large groups of agricultural workers were insured while employed as temporary office staffers.

As claims would come in, even though the insurance certificates were fraudulent, Owen’s would pay the money himself. Sooner or later, he got more claims than he could pay and the whole Ponzi scheme collapsed, Director of Criminal Investigations Billy Sullivan remarked.

Sullivan said the scheme didn’t stop with the thousands of farm workers who were victimized, but Georgia and California taxpayers took a hit too.

Everything they didn’t or couldn’t pay fell back on Georgia and California Taxpayers and that was approximately $60 million. Right now, we feel comfortable estimating the total loss at $120 million. We believe Owens fraudulently obtained $60 million himself,” Sullivan said.

Two female suspects are also involved, one in Georgia and Jennifer Lynn Ceville James, of Tampa, Florida.

The elaborate scheme involved six states from California to South Carolina and demanded hundreds of hours in the legwork that took more than two years.

In all, the four suspects face 88 counts of insurance fraud, identity fraud, felony theft, RICO and many other charges.

Investigators said they tried to serve a warrant at a home Ronda Nicole Taylor, 48, of Stone Mountain, but she was not home. She is wanted for 21 outstanding warrants connected to the scheme.

Home Health Agency Owners Convicted for $4M Fraud

Two owners and operators of a home health agency were sentenced to 10 years and 6½ years in federal prison for their roles in a scheme to bill Medicare for various items and services – including home health services, diagnostic testing, medical procedures and durable medical equipment – that were not medically necessary and/or were not provided.

Angela Avetisyan, 43, of Glendale, was sentenced to 120 months in prison by United States District Judge Otis D. Wright II, who also ordered Avetisyan to pay $4,283,674 in restitution and to forfeit all right, title, and interest in $172,000 seized by the government in May 2014, as well as six real properties purchased with fraud proceeds. The Court ordered Avetisyan to make an immediate partial restitution payment of $10,000.

Ashot Minasyan, 61, of North Hollywood, was sentenced to 78 months in prison by Judge Wright, who also ordered Minasyan to pay $4,283,674 in restitution and to forfeit all right, title, and interest in the same $172,000 and six real properties. The Court ordered Minasyan to make an immediate partial restitution payment of $100,000.

Avetisyan and Minasyan were charged along with Robert Glazer, 73, and Marina Merino, 62, both of Los Angeles, in a second superseding indictment returned in June 2015. On June 7, 2019, co-defendants Glazer and Merino were found guilty after a seven-day trial of conspiracy to commit health care fraud and health care fraud.

Avetisyan and Minasyan each pleaded guilty on Oct. 9, 2018, to one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud. As part of their guilty pleas, Avetisyan and Minasyan admitted that, as co-owners and operators of the Los Angeles-based Fifth Avenue Home Health, they engaged in a conspiracy with Glazer, Merino and others to recruit Medicare patients to Glazer’s clinic so that Glazer could use those patients’ information to bill for medically unnecessary outpatient clinic services and refer those patients for medically unnecessary home health services from Fifth Avenue and other home health agencies. Avetisyan and Minasyan further admitted that they paid Merino and other patient recruiters illegal kickbacks to bring Medicare patients to the Glazer clinic.

As found at sentencing by the Court, Avetisyan and Minasyan, along with their co-conspirators, submitted and caused to be submitted false and fraudulent claims for home health services that were medically unnecessary, for services that were not provided and for claims obtained by the payment of illegal kickbacks.

Since its inception in March 2007, the Medicare Fraud Strike Force, which maintains 14 strike forces operating in 23 districts, has charged nearly 4,000 defendants who have collectively billed the Medicare program for more than $14 billion. In addition, the HHS Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, working in conjunction with HHS-OIG, are taking steps to increase accountability and decrease the presence of fraudulent providers.

Court Approves Marijuana – In CA Prisons!

The slippery slope of “medical marijuana” inches closer and closer to acceptance in many areas, including treatment of workers’ compensation claims. The 3rd District Court of Appeal helped to kick the door open when it ruled that California voters legalized recreational possession of less than an ounce of cannabis in 2016, with no exception even for those behind bars.

In the published case of People v Raybon, the court overturned the Sacramento County convictions of five inmates who had been found with marijuana in their prison cells. The court rejected multiple arguments presented by the California Attorney General, Xavier Becerra, who vigorously argued in favor of the convictions. In so doing, the court claimed that the Attorney General “recycled” old arguments in prior cases that have previously ruled against his arguments.

“The question before us is not what the Legislature intended in 1949 or 1990, but whether the voters amended Penal Code section 4573.6 by passing Proposition 64 in 2016. The drafters and voters are entitled to opt for a different approach and, in this case, they did just that. They amended the statute to eliminate criminal sanctions for possession of less than an ounce of marijuana and they retained criminal sanctions for possessing more than an ounce or for smoking or ingesting it.”

“The fact the Attorney General may not agree with the voters does not empower us to rewrite the initiative.”

According to the plain language of … Proposition 64, possession of less than an ounce of cannabis in prison is no longer a felony,” the court ruled Tuesday. “Smoking or ingesting cannabis in prison remains a felony.”

The three-judge panel also rejected the state’s argument that guards will lose control over prisons if inmates are free to possess small quantities of marijuana, noting that possession can still be punished as a rules violation with longer prison terms or a reduction in privileges.

While prison officials can still punish inmates for violating the rules, “this ruling will prevent inmates from having years added to their sentences for simple possession, reducing overcrowding and saving $50,000-75,000 a year in unnecessary costs,” said Assistant Public Defender David Lynch.

The judges scolded the attorney general’s office for a counter-argument it said “uses arcane rules” and “twists the meaning of the words of the statute.”

Becerra’s office argued that the court’s reading of the law was absurd because it in effect allows controlled substances into prisons. But the court noted that it previously ruled that it’s not illegal for inmates to have properly prescribed medications or medical marijuana behind bars – though it may be against the rules.

The Attorney General raises the same hackneyed and losing arguments in each case involving contraband in jails or prisons,” the judges wrote.

“The voters made quite clear their intention to avoid spending state and county funds prosecuting possession of less than an ounce of marijuana, and quite clear that they did not want to see adults suffer criminal convictions for possessing less than an ounce of marijuana,” Sacramento County Assistant Public Defender Leonard Tauman said in an email. The appeals court “quite properly honored what the electorate passed.”

“We want to be clear that drug use and sales within state prisons remains prohibited,” said corrections department spokeswoman Vicky Waters. She said the department “is committed to providing a safe, accountable environment for prisoners and staff alike and we plan to evaluate this decision with an eye towards maintaining health and security within our institutions.”

Attorney General Xavier Becerra’s office said it is reviewing the ruling and did not say if he will appeal.