Menu Close

Tag: 2015 News

DWC Advice for Panel Requests Between Sept 3 and October 1.

The DWC will implement a new online panel process for represented initial panel requests on October 1, 2015. DWC will no longer accept or process paper submissions postmarked after September 3, 2015. The new process requires parties in a represented case to submit initial QME panel requests online and immediately receive a QME panel. The requesting party will then serve the panel request form, any required documentation and the QME panel on all parties with a proof of service.

The DWC has posted an online QME Form 106 Panel Request training video and FAQs on the Medical Unit website. The video demonstration details the way in which represented initial panel requests will be submitted using the new online system.

However, the question remains “what is the process for QME panel requests between September 3 and October 1?” We posed this question to the medical unit this week and received this response.

“The Medical Unit will not accept Form 106 panel requests between Sept. 3 and Oct. 1. All panel requests on paper Form 106 must be postmarked no later than Sept. 3, 2015. No panel requests will be processed for any represented initial panel requests postmarked after that date. This will give the Medical Unit an opportunity to process all of the paper requests. Pursuant to 8 CCR section 31.1(c), if the Medical Director is unable to issue a QME panel in a represented case within 30 calendar days from receipt of the request, parties may seek an order from a worker’s compensation administrative law judge. Although the Medical Unit will not process any represented initial panel requests submitted after Sept. 3, 2015, the parties will be able to generate a panel list automatically as of Oct. 1, 2015. Therefore, despite not processing any requests during that time period, the delay will be less than 30 calendar days for obtaining a panel list.”

What this means is that the DWC will utilize the time between September 3, 2015 and October 1, 2015 to process all current paper requests. Although the Unit will not process any paper panel requests submitted after September 3, 2015, you will be able to generate a panel list automatically as of October 1, 2015. The timing should be carefully managed.

New Law Adds Insurance Industry Oversight

Assembly Bill 553, authored by Assembly Member Tom Daly, was signed into law by Governor Brown. Sponsored by Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones, AB 553 establishes new oversight tools to reduce the number of insolvencies of insurance companies and bring U.S. standards for regulating insurance companies in compliance with established international standards.

“As the largest insurance market in the country, California is again leading the way in improving the regulation of insurance companies,” said Commissioner Jones. “AB 553 includes an urgency clause so California can have these new consumer protection tools in place as soon as possible. I’d like to thank Assembly Member Daly for authoring this important bill.”

Supported by insurance industry stakeholders, AB 553 improves oversight of the corporate governance of insurers by aligning state law with new and improved standards developed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) in two key areas:

1) Improved oversight of the corporate governance policies and practices of insurance companies;including their board management structure, code of conduct, and risk-management processes. New disclosures and filings will assist the Commissioner in determining the overall financial and corporate capacity of companies to conduct business in California, and identify troubled companies quickly enough to avoid insurance company insolvencies that would jeopardize consumers.
2) Preserved national system of state-based insurance regulation by clarifying the role of state insurance departments as group-wide supervisors over multi-national insurance groups, as part of the Insurance Holding Company System Regulator Act.

The primary purpose of AB 553 is to make sure California insurance regulatory laws conform with national and international insurance regulatory laws and to provide the California Department of Insurance with additional resources for fulfilling its mission of overseeing the solvency of insurance companies.

The amendment to the Holding Company System Regulatory Act will clarify the roles of a group-wide supervisor between the states and the international insurance community.

AB 553 was approved by the Assembly and Senate unanimously. There was no opposition noted in the legislative record. As an “urgency statute” the bill takes effect immediately.

More Than Half of Comp Costs Are Now Medical Benefits

Workers’ compensation benefits as a share of payroll for injured workers continue to decline even as employment grows and overall employer costs increase, according to a new report from the National Academy of Social Insurance.

Historically, cash benefits have been a larger share of workers’ compensation benefits than medical payments to injured workers. Due to rising health care costs during the last 30 years, medical benefits now account for an increasing share of total workers’ compensation benefits, from 29 percent in 1980 to more than 50 percent in 2013. About 33 states currently spend more than half of their workers’ compensation spending on medical care for injured workers. California pays 54.7% of costs as medical benefits.

Despite the growth in employment following the Great Recession – and the significant uptick in employees eligible to receive workers’ compensation – benefits per $100 of covered payroll dropped to $0.98 in 2013, a 5 percent decrease from 2009. At the same time, the growing workforce has translated into rising workers’ compensation costs for employers – now $1.37 per $100 of covered payroll, a 5 percent increase from 2009.

Workers’ compensation benefits as a share of payroll were lower in 2013 than during almost any period in the last three decades, according to the report Workers’ Compensation: Benefits, Coverage, and Costs, 2013. Total workers’ compensation benefits in 2013 were $63.6 billion, while employer costs were $88.5 billion.

Benefits as a percent of payroll declined in 39 states between 2009 and 2013, continuing a national trend in lower benefits relative to payroll that began in the 1990s. “The decline is due to a drop in workplace injuries as well as changes in many state laws that made it more difficult for workers’ to qualify for benefits,” said John F. Burton, Professor Emeritus, Rutgers and Cornell University. “These state laws include more stringent compensation rules, the reduction of coverage for certain medical diagnoses, and new legal requirements that make it more difficult for workers to succeed in their claims for benefits.”

DWC Sets Drug Formulary Meeting for September 14

The DWC has scheduled a public meeting to discuss issues related to developing an evidence-based drug formulary for use in the workers’ compensation system. The meeting will be held on Monday, September 14, 2015 from 10 a.m. to noon at the Elihu Harris State Office Building Auditorium, 1515 Clay Street in Oakland.

This meeting is an opportunity for the public to provide input to the Division on developing and implementing a formulary. DWC will facilitate discussion on how to best achieve the intended goals of an evidence-based drug formulary in the workers’ compensation system, which include the following:

1) Improve appropriate care through the dispensing of evidenced-based medicine
2) Expedite pharmaceutical treatment for ill and injured workers
3) Reduce delays, including the reducing the need for elevated utilization review and independent medical review
4) Improve efficient delivery of medical benefits and reduce administrative costs.

At its most basic level, a formulary is a list of medicines. Traditionally, a formulary contained a collection of formulas for the compounding and testing of medication (a resource closer to what would be referred to as a pharmacopoeia today). Today, the main function of a prescription formulary is to specify particular medications that are approved to be prescribed under a particular public or private payment program. The development of prescription formularies is based on evaluations of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of drugs.

By the turn of the millennium, 156 countries had national or provincial essential medicines lists and 135 countries had national treatment guidelines and/or formulary manuals. In the US, where a system of private healthcare is in place, a formulary is a list of prescription drugs available to enrollees. When used appropriately, formularies can help manage drug costs. Most formularies cover at least one drug in each drug class, and encourage generic substitution (also known as a preferred drug list).

“Most Wanted” Uninsured/Unlicensed Contracts Gets 9 Year Sentence

Years of construction fraud and grand theft by scamming consumers out of thousands of dollars for asphalt driveway paving work will keep Alexander Pike Mitchell behind bars at least two additional years. Mitchell, who has a history of contracting without a license and abandoning jobs once he’s secured a down payment, pled guilty to three additional felony grand theft counts (Penal Code §487a) with a Harvey Waiver* on all dismissed accounts in Riverside Superior Court. Under a Harvey Waiver, the offender is required to pay restitution on all counts connected with the plea. Restitution orders are to be imposed based on the victim’s losses and benefits paid by the Victim Compensation Program.

The Contractors State License Board (CSLB) added Mitchell to its Most Wanted List in April 2013 after the San Diego County District Attorney’s Office issued a warrant for his arrest that included five counts of grand theft, diversion of funds, and two counts of elder abuse. Mitchell was suspected of scamming consumers in Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Riverside, and San Diego counties.

On June 17, 2013, Mitchell pled guilty to two counts of grand theft in San Diego County Superior Court and agreed to pay victim restitution. He received a four-year sentence with a 50/50 split of the time, meaning he must serve two years in San Diego County Jail and two years on mandatory supervision. He was ordered to pay $9,300 in victim restitution in that case.

Shortly after that ruling, an additional 40-month state prison sentence was added to the term he already was serving for theft by false pretenses, operating without a contractor license with prior convictions, and a workers’ compensation insurance violation. Overall, Mitchell has been sentenced to serve a total of nine years and four months for all of his convictions.

“CSLB investigators find unscrupulous people like Alex Pike Mitchell every day,” said CSLB Registrar Cindi Christenson. “This is why we encourage everyone to check our website or call our toll-free line to make sure any contractor you’re considering is licensed and in good standing with CSLB.”

CSLB’s Most Wanted List was created as an added measure to protect California consumers from dishonest operators.

Uninsured Trucking Company Owner Convicted

Bhagwant Singh, 45, of Hesperia, pleaded no contest to felony payroll tax evasion in Victorville Superior Court.

On Aug. 4, Singh entered a plea of “no contest” to the charge of Payroll Tax Evasion, a felony violation of Unemployment Insurance Code 2117.5.

According to Deputy District Attorney David W. Simon, who prosecuted the case, the plea was the culmination of an investigation and prosecution of Singh and his trucking and transportation companies “A and J Shipping” and “Los Angeles Express Trucking” of Fontana and Hesperia.

The investigation began after a number of complaints were received by the Labor Commissioner’s office alleging underpayment of wages by Singh to his employees. When it was discovered that Singh’s businesses did not have the proper Workers’ Compensation Insurance coverage for their employees, the investigation was taken over by the Workers’ Compensation Fraud Unit of the San Bernardino County District Attorney’s Office.

During the investigation, it was discovered that in addition to the allegations of underpaying workers and not having the required insurance coverage, Singh also failed to submit payroll records and deductions as required to the taxing authority–California’s “Employment Development Department” (EDD).

As a result of this criminal conviction, Singh was placed on formal Probation for a period of three years, ordered to make restitution to the EDD in the amount of $178,000, and other terms and conditions of probation.

FBI Affidavit Alleges Comp Attorney Paid Kickbacks

53 year old Marc Terbeek, an Oakland workers compensation attorney, is allegedly involved in a massive corruption case filed by the FBI’s Public Corruption and Civil Rights Squad and unsealed this week. What is known are allegations only and are not considered to be true until proven in a court of law. The FBI and IRS raided Terbeek’s office in January 2015 and since then he has been cooperating with investigators.Tarbeek has been informed by the US Attorney that he is also a target of the investigation and is “likely to be prosecuted.” The sworn Affidavit signed by FBI Special Agent Roahn Wynar attached to the criminal complaint against Daniel Rush, a cannabis union leader who faces serious federal charges involving bribery and other matters, claims the following scenario occurred.

Daniel Rush was an official with the United Food and Commercial Workers Union that had established a “Cannabis Division” to organize dispensary employees. He was also closely involved in Measure D, the process to regulate medical marijuana dispensaries in Los Angeles, and also connected to legalization’s most prominent pitchman: Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom.

Rush got in over his head in 2010 when he borrowed $600,000 from Martin Kaufman, a dispensary operator that he could not pay back. In 2014, Rush and workers’ compensation attorney Tarbeek who represented some of the dispensary companies in the area “took steps” to provide “labor benefits” to Kaufman in exchange for forgiveness of the debt. Carl Anderson had an Oakland pot club until 2005, and wanted a new permit in 2010. Anderson tapped Rush and Terbeek for help with the application. Andersen is also cooperating with the FBI.

According to the allegations of paragraph 31 of the Affidavit , Tarbeek admitted to the FBI that he had been paying “kickbacks” to Rush for sending Terbeek legal work since 2004. Rush “encouraged” Terbeek to acquire a workers compensation law practice to litigate cases referred by the Insitutio Laboral de la Raza. In exchange Tarbeek gave Rush a credit card associated with Terbeek’s law firm and Terbeek paid it off routinely. Text messages confirmed this practice continued as late as February 2015. From 2010 to 2015, Rush spent $110,000 on Terbeek’s card, about $2,000 per month, for mostly personal expenses.

Also, Terbeek allegedly agreed to share legal fees with Rush derived from Terbeek’s clients seeking permits to operate dispensaries in California, Nevada, and beyond (Affidavit paragraph 34). After creation of this arrangement, Terbeek paid Rush $5000 as his “share” of the medical marijuana legal fees.

It is likely that this case will become more complex and involve higher level accomplices as it evolves. Only Rush has been charged so far, and others are “cooperating” with authorities, meaning providing information that will lead the FBI on with a complex investigation. The union claims it has fired Rush.

Drobot Files Amended Complaint Against Colleagues

Michael Drobot pleaded guilty more than a year ago to criminal charges related to paying more than $20 million in kickbacks and bribing California state Sen. Ron Calderon to preserve a loophole in state law that enabled him to charge insurers sky-high prices for spinal hardware used at the Pacific Hospital of Long Beach. He is scheduled to be sentenced next year.

The State Compensation Insurance Fund filed a Rico case against Drobot and others in federal court to recoup payments made to Defendants, who it alleges concealed the system of illegal kickbacks, fee-splitting, corporate practice of medicine, and other misconduct. The State Fund pleadings and documents filed in that case makes an interesting read if not a well documented tutorial on the dark side of the practice of medicine.

Michael Drobot last April filed a 15 page third-party complaint for equitable indemnity and declaratory relief against 22 doctors, health executives, chiropractors and a lawyer. Equitable indemnity says in theory that Drobot should not have to pay the State Fund, but if it ends up that he does, then he wants others to share the blame with him and pay the damages.

On August 10, Drobot filed his First Amended Third Party Complaint, in federal court again asking others who profited from the enterprise to step forward and pay the State Fund should they prevail in the case. The Amended Complaint adds details, substance, some dollar values to the terse information previously alleged by Drobot. More importantly, the alleged schemes for movement of money such as research fees, consulting agreements, and the like are more clearly alleged.

Just one illustrative example is the allegations against Philip A. Sobol MD, a physician and principal of Sobol Orthopedic Medical Group, Inc., Sobol allegedly referred patients, and performed surgeries at Pacific Hospital between 2005 and 2013. During that same timeframe there were option agreements between the parties to purchase his medical practice. Over $5 million was paid to Sobol under this option agreement, which the State Fund alleges the money “included disguised payments for unlawful patient referrals to PHLB, that were computed and based on patient referrals.”

The new pleading goes on to specify how the allegations implicate other physicians, and medical operatives in the complex structure that Drobot now claims must come forward and take responsibility should the State Fund prevail. A careful study of these pleadings would indeed be the basis for a claim investigation framework involving any of these parties and a good learning experience on how kickbacks can be hidden and masked.

Bumble Bee Foods to Pay $6 Million For Industrial Death

NBC News reports that Bumble Bee Foods will pay $6 million for the 2012 death of an employee who was cooked in an industrial oven with tons of tuna – the biggest settlement ever in a California for workplace safety violations involving a single victim.

Jose Melena, 62, was loading a 35-foot-long oven at the company’s Santa Fe Springs plant before dawn Oct. 11, 2012, when a co-worker, who mistakenly believed Melena was in the bathroom, filled the pressure cooker with 12,000 pounds of canned tuna and it was turned on. His body was found two hours later after the pressure cooker, which reached 270 degrees, was turned off and opened.

The state report, which was filed with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, said the manned oven system was inherently dangerous, finding that the chain that pulls carts of tuna into the ovens would sometimes get snagged, requiring operators to enter the ovens to pull the carts through.

Los Angeles County District Attorney Jackie Lacey said Bumble Bee will pay $3 million to replace all of its outdated tuna ovens with automated ovens and will never require workers to set foot inside the super-heated, pressurized steam cookers. The company will also pay $1.5 million in restitution to Melena’s family, and it will pay the district attorney’s Environmental Enforcement Fund $750,000 for workplace safety programs and $750,000 in fines, penalties and court costs.

In addition, Saul Florez, Bumble Bee’s former safety manager, pleaded guilty to a felony count of willfully violating lockout rules and indirectly causing Melena’s death. He was sentenced to three years’ probation, ordered to complete 30 days of community labor and assessed $19,000 in fines and penalties.

And another co-defendant, Angel Rodriguez, Bumble Bee’s director of plant operations, will be allowed to plead guilty to a misdemeanor in 18 months if he completes 320 hours of community service, pays $11,400 in fines and takes classes on confined space rules.

Surveillance Leads to Arrest of Monterey Cook

The County District Attorney’s office reports that a Marina man pleaded no contest to workers’ compensation fraud in Monterey County Superior Court .

Sven Hoffman, 56, was charged with one felony count of making a false statement for the purpose of obtaining workers’ compensation benefits and one felony count of knowingly failing to disclose an event that affected his right to an insurance benefit. He will be sentenced by Judge Carrie M. Panetta on Sept. 22.

Hoffman was a prep cook at a local corporation, and on June 13, 2013, he claimed that his right wrist was injured from kneading dough. He later added his left wrist to the injury report and received medical treatment as well as total temporary disability payments. He repeatedly indicated he could not return to work as he continued to receive medical treatment and financial benefits.

An investigation showed that during this time, Hoffman failed to disclose he had been working and engaged in various activities, including cooking for a private party, working as a consulting chef at a local restaurant, providing a homemade pizza demonstration and assembling office furniture. Surveillance showed he was also very active repairing a long section of a private fence and working out strenuously at a local gym.

Both of the felony charges carry a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a substantial fine. Also, in insurance fraud cases, state law allows restitution to be ordered and can include expenses like attorney’s fees and investigation costs. The employer has reported a loss of $36,256.83.