Menu Close

Author: WorkCompAcademy

DIR Hosts Workplace Justice Summit

California Labor Commissioner Julie A. Su, the Department of Industrial Relations, the California Commission on the Status of Women and Girls and other community sponsors including Asian Americans Advancing Justice – Los Angeles hosted the Workplace Justice Summit to focus on enforcing workplace protections. The summit at Loyola Law School brought together government leaders, workers’ rights advocates, employer organizations, prosecutors and law enforcement to increase collaboration in efforts to fight wage theft and other workplace abuses.

“This year is the 20th anniversary of the freedom of the heroic Thai garment workers who were trafficked into the U.S. and forced to work behind barbed wire and under armed guard in El Monte,” said Labor Commissioner Su. “The purpose of the Summit is to honor our commitment to those workers and increase our effectiveness to ensure the horror of El Monte is never repeated.” Su honored the Thai garment workers at a special reception the preceding evening.

The Labor Commissioner has had a record-breaking four years in enforcing labor laws. Since 2012, hearing awards in Berman wage claims have been at a record high. Total wages and civil penalties assessed in citations have been more than $70 million a year each year from 2012 to 2014, compared to $25.4 million in 2010. Under Labor Commissioner Su, public works enforcement has also been at all-time highs of $25.2 million in 2012, $40.2 million in 2013 and $30.4 million in 2014, compared to less than $25 million every year in the decade prior.

The summit focused on strategies to fight workplace abuses, including wage theft, discrimination and the gender pay disparity, human trafficking, workplace violence and retaliation. District attorneys who have partnered with the Labor Commissioner’s Office provided training on how to prosecute wage theft cases.

“This summit will help make workplace justice a reality for even more California workers,” said Christine Baker, Director of the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR). The Labor Commissioner’s Office, officially known as the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE), is a division of DIR.

“Fair pay, economic justice and a level playing field for businesses require creative solutions and collaboration with advocates, workers, prosecutors and employers,” said David M. Lanier, Secretary of the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency.

CWCI Readies New Benefit Notices For January

In August, California amended workers’ comp benefit notice regulations that govern the DWC-1 claim form/Notice of Potential Eligibility (NOPE), posting notices and other notices that employers and claims administrators use to inform employees of their rights and obligations under state law.

The regulations address statutory changes enacted in 2012, and require additions to notices including Medical Provider Network (MPN) information that replaces the requirement for a separate MPN poster, new language on electronic service of notices, advice that medical services are subject to approval, a revised permanent disability description and new language on timely reporting.

The state made the regulations effective January 1, 2016 to allow claims operations and employers time to obtain and distribute revised notices, so they may continue to use current versions until the end of 2015, after which they should begin using updated materials. With the January 1 effective date less than 3 months away, the community must gear up quickly.

Private entities may publish the required workers’ comp posting notices and new hire pamphlets if they are approved by the state, and many insurers and employers rely on the California Workers’ Compensation Institute (CWCI) to produce these materials and keep them up to date. After the state amended the regulations in August, CWCI updated its new hire pamphlet and posting notice, obtained state approvals, translated them into Spanish and printed them along with the new DWC-1/NOPE, which as of January will consist of a 3-page NOPE attached to four copies of the claim form, printed on NCR paper to eliminate the need to photocopy. In addition to the changes adopted in August, CWCI added information to its pamphlet and posting notice on the state’s $120 million Return to Work Supplement Program to reflect regulations adopted in April, and updated its “Facts For Injured Workers” pamphlet, which many claims administrators use to provide information to injured workers early in the life of a claim, and to meet the notice requirement about fraudulent receipt of temporary disability and the notice requirement for victims of workplace crime.

CWCI now has the revised materials in stock and ready to ship. Claims operations or employers that wish to obtain revised notices so they can update their claim kits before the January 1 deadline, or who need more details, can visit www.cwci.org/store.html or call (510) 251-9470.

Insurance Commissioner Rebuffs Carrier for High Prices

Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones announced that Department of Insurance actuaries found Aetna Life Insurance Company’s most recent small group health insurance rate increase excessive and unreasonable. Aetna is increasing rates for small businesses and their employees by an annual average of 27.4 percent. This increase will impact small businesses that renew their policies in the fourth quarter of 2015 -affecting over 40,000 employees.

“Small businesses are the lifeblood of California’s economy,” said Commissioner Jones. “Small businesses simply cannot afford unwarranted and unreasonable increases in health insurance costs nor can their employees.”

Department of Insurance actuaries reviewed Aetna’s rate filing and found that the average 27.4 percent increase was not based on Aetna’s most recent claims experience but was based on an unreasonable and excessive pricing trend and other unreasonable assumptions. Commissioner Jones advised Aetna of the department’s finding that the rate increase was unjustified. Aetna decided to impose the rate increase despite the finding that the rate increase is excessive and unreasonable, costing small businesses a projected $5.5 million in excessive rates.

Unlike 35 other states, California does not have the legal authority to reject excessive health insurance rate increases. A recent national study found that those states with the authority to regulate health insurance rates had lower rate increases as compared to states like California which do not have the authority to regulate health insurance rates.

DWC Announces Chief Judge and Medical Director Changes

Division of Workers’ Compensation Chief Judge Richard Newman and Executive Medical Director Rupali Das are leaving the division for new endeavors: Judge Newman will join the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) and Dr. Das will retire from state service.

Chief Judge Newman will leave DWC at the end of November to assume the position of Secretary and Deputy Commissioner of the WCAB as of December 2. The current Secretary, Rick Dietrich, retires effective December 30. Judge Newman has had a long career in workers’ compensation. Prior to beginning his tenure as chief judge in September 2011, he worked for the Division as an attorney, judge and presiding judge. As chief judge, Newman had the responsibility of overseeing the Division’s 24 district offices, including the hiring and supervision of judges and judicial staff and involvement in facility and personnel issues.

During his tenure, Judge Newman re-instituted yearly statewide judge and I and A training and regular PJ training. He worked to promote uniform district office procedures and forms, participated in a major revision of the Policy and Procedure Manual, helped in the creation of the new online QME panel process. He assisted the Division in the implementation of SB 863, including development of the lien fee payment process and revision of the lien filing regulations. He also helped bring in Court Call to enable the option of telephonic conferencing by attorneys, and he worked to equalize the workload among district offices through the use of video lien trials and conferences. He is currently overseeing the creation of updated and simplified EAMS manuals for judges, secretaries and hearing officers. Judge Thomas Clarke will assume the position of acting chief judge.

After dedicating her career to improving the health of Californians, Dr. Rupali Das will be retiring from state service in January 2016. Since her appointment as DWC Executive Medical Director in 2012, Dr. Das has been an influential and innovative member of the DIR executive team and played a key role in implementing SB 863, Governor Brown’s groundbreaking workers’ compensation reform legislation, including Independent Medical Review, Independent Bill Review, and an updated physician fee schedule.

Dr. Das advocated for appropriate evidence-based practices, transparency, and metrics to guide and improve policy and prioritize quality of care. She was a strong proponent of the importance of prevention in all policies. Dr. Das worked closely with her team to strengthen the evidence-based framework of DWC’s Medical Treatment Utilization Schedule and introduce updated guidelines for the treatment of chronic pain in workers. She collaborated with other state agencies to address the nationwide epidemic of prescription drug overdose and death and propose guidelines for prescribing opioids for injured workers. She worked to educate medical audiences about workers’ compensation and enhance the quality of Qualified Medical Evaluators.

Dr. Das joined state service in 1993. Prior to joining DWC, she served at Cal/EPA and the California Department of Public Health. Following retirement, she will be joining Zenith Insurance Company as its Senior Vice President and California Medical Director.

Immediately following Dr. Das’ retirement, Associate Medical Director Dr. Raymond Meister will assume interim responsibilities while DWC conducts an active search for an Executive Medical Director.

Study Compares Total Knee Replacement Alternatives

Total knee replacement can usually relieve pain and improve function, but a nonsurgical regimen can also be effective in some people without posing the complication risks that can plague people who choose surgery, according to a new study reviewed in Reuters Health. The test found that while 85 percent of patients who underwent surgery showed clinically-significant improvement after one year, so did 67 percent assigned to a combination of supervised exercise, use of insoles, pain medication, education and dietary advice.

There’s little debate that knee replacement helps many people, and the new test of 100 patients – the first randomized controlled trial ever done on the technique – confirms it. Surgery patients didn’t show just some improvement. They registered far less pain and disability than those assigned to the non-surgery group.

Yet the study was needed because as many as 1 percent of surgery patients die within 90 days of their operation and about 1 in 5 have residual pain at least six months after the procedure, said Dr. Jeffrey Katz of Harvard Medical School in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in an accompanying editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine. “Until now, we have lacked rigorously controlled comparisons between total knee replacement and its alternatives.”

“People need to understand and respect that knee replacement is not without complication. Knee replacement is a big surgical procedure and there are risks associated with it,” Dr. Andrew Pollak, chairman of orthopedics at the University of Maryland School of Medicine in Baltimore, told Reuters Health. The study “really emphasizes what we suspected all along – total knee replacement works. It will be obvious to many of us who take care of patients. But for patients with significant symptoms and evidence of arthritis, total knee replacement is a very effective way of improving quality of life,” said Pollak, who was not associated with the research. “Therapy alone has a role. It does help certain patients. It can certainly prolong the time to when knee replacement is necessary.”

More than 670,000 total knee replacements are done in the U.S. each year at a cost of $36.1 billion.

Lawmakers Seek Workers’ Compensation Federal Oversight

A story published on NPR says that ten ranking Democrats on key Senate and House committees are urging the Labor Department to respond to a “pattern of detrimental changes in state workers’ compensation laws” that have reduced protections and benefits for injured workers over the past decade.

In a letter to Labor Secretary Thomas Perez, the lawmakers cited an investigation by NPR and ProPublica, which found that 33 states have cut workers’ comp benefits, made it more difficult to qualify or given employers more control over medical care decisions. The letter also referred to NPR/ProPublica stories last week that detailed an emerging trend that permits employers to dump out of state-regulated workers’ comp programs, write their own injury plans and limit benefits on their own. “State workers’ compensation laws are no longer providing adequate levels of support and compensation for workers injured on the job,” the lawmakers wrote. “The race to the bottom now appears to be nearly bottomless…”

The letter is signed by Bernie Sanders, the Democratic presidential hopeful and ranking minority member of the Senate Budget Committee, Patty Murray, D-Washington, the ranking member of the Senate Labor Committee, Bobby Scott, D-Virginia, the ranking member of the House Workforce Committee, and seven other senior Democrats on House and Senate Budget, Finance, Employment, Workforce, Ways and Means, and Social Security Committees.

The agency said it would review the letter and work “with stakeholders to find real solutions” but did not commit to any specific action. An NPR/ProPublica request to speak with Secretary Perez was declined.

Until budget cuts in 2004, the Labor Department tracked changes in state workers’ comp laws and failures to meet 19 minimum and essential standards for benefits established by a 1972 Commission convened by President Richard Nixon.

Rep. Scott says the benefits cutbacks make federal action necessary, even though workers’ comp is legislated and managed by states. “If these workers aren’t getting benefits under workers’ comp a lot of them end up getting benefits under Social Security Disability or Medicaid [and] food stamps because they’re not working,” said Rep Scott. “And so there is a strong federal interest in making sure that the workers’ comp programs pay appropriate benefits.”

A 2007 study by J. Paul Leigh, a health economist at the University of California, Davis, estimated that workplace injuries not covered by workers’ comp cost government programs about $30 billion a year.

Federal intervention may also come as the result of the “opt out” movement in Texas and Oklahoma, in which employers shun heavily-regulated workers’ comp and are permitted to write and administer their own largely-unregulated workplace injury plans. South Carolina and Tennessee are considering opt-out laws now and proponents are aiming for a dozen states by the end of the decade.

11 Percent of Americans Now on Antidepressant Meds

A recent study indicates that more than two-thirds of people who have been prescribed antidepressants are likely not suffering from depression at all. Sixty-nine percent of those taking SSRIs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) such as Prozac, do not display the classic symptoms of major depressive disorder, which is commonly known as clinical depression, according to a report published in the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry.

SSRIs are also prescribed for other mental disorders, including generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, obsessive compulsive disorder, and panic disorder, but the researchers found that 38 percent of those taking the drugs did not meet the criteria for these conditions either.

Commonly considered to have fewer side effects than other antidepressants, SSRIs are the most prescribed class of drugs for treating depression and other psychiatric disorders.

The authors of the study say that many individuals who are prescribed and use antidepressant medications may not have met criteria for mental disorders. Our data indicate that antidepressants are commonly used in the absence of clear evidence-based indications.

Between 1988 and 2008, the use of antidepressants increased almost 400 percent, with 11 percent of Americans now taking these drugs regularly. This statistic is certainly not reflected in this histories given to PTPs in typical workers’ compensation cases. One might question why workers’ compensation claimants differ, or why PTPs and QMEs do not challenge histories that routinely defy existing epidemiological data.

The official U.S. guidelines for diagnosing clinical depression are when a “person has five or more depressive symptoms over a two week period, most of the day, nearly every day.” Symptoms of clinical depression range from a depressed mood to thoughts of suicide. They might also include a lack of interest in normal activities, changes in weight or appetite, insomnia or too much sleep, restlessness, fatigue, guilty feelings and problems with concentration or decision-making.

Although SSRIs are considered to be safer than other antidepressants, they are not without potentially serious side effects. Studies have shown that the use of antidepressants involves an “increased risk of suicidal behaviour and thoughts in children and adolescents, particularly in the early stages of treatment.” The use of Prozac and Seroxat actually doubles the risk of suicidal behavior among young people. Studies have also indicated an increased risk of children being born with autism when their mothers take SSRIs during pregnancy.

Considering the risks, these drugs should never be casually prescribed. However, in this climate of increased reliance on pills to solve every problem, over-prescription of medications is rampant, particularly in the U.S.

FEHA Does Not Mandate Shift of Duties to Other Employees

Virglio Duarte worked for The Vons Companies, Inc. as a baker since 1990. He suffered a work-related injury in 2009 that restricted his ability to use his left arm. Vons rescheduled Duarte for 12 weeks to a shift at which he had access to a “baker’s helper,” who did the lifting, pushing and pulling that the baker usually does.

Vons generally offers up to 12 weeks of what it calls modified duty to employees who have a workers’ compensation injury. If the employee continues to have work restrictions after 12 weeks, he or she is taken off this modified duty and put on temporary disability – in this case involuntarily. Vons investigated another position for Duarte that turned out to be unavailable. After a lengthy leave of absence, Vons terminated Duarte.

Duarte contends in his civil suit against Vons that he was not accommodated properly, Vons failed to engage in a good faith interactive process, and he was harassed because of his disability. Duarte brought claims under FEHA, as well as other causes of action. Vons moved for summary judgment arguing there was no triable issue of fact. The trial court granted a summary judgment in favor of Vons, and the Court of Appeal affirmed in the unpublished case of Duarte v. The Vons Companies, Inc.

For a plaintiff to prevail on claims for disability discrimination and failure to provide a reasonable accommodation, he or she must show that he or she was able to perform the essential functions of the position from which he or she was terminated with or without a reasonable accommodation. The FEHA does not require an employer to shift a disabled employee’s essential duty to other employees. The statute does not require other employees to work harder or longer. Slowing production or assigning an injured worker lighter loads is not required by law.  Also, that another employee is required to do an employee’s duties suggests that the duties are essential.

Although an employee cannot be expected to identify and request all possible accommodations during the interactive process, “the employee should be able to identify specific, available reasonable accommodations through the litigation process, and particularly by the time the parties have conducted discovery and reached the summary stage.” .) If the employee cannot identify such a reasonable accommodation after discovery in litigation, he or she has suffered no remediable injury from any violation.

The only accommodations Duarte proposed was to have a helper do all the lifting, pulling, pushing, and reaching and pouring of heavy material and allowing Duarte to use a scooper instead of pouring. The proposed accommodation was not reasonable as a matter of law. With regard to Duarte’s claims that Vons did not fulfill its duty to engage in the interactive process, Duarte’s failure to identify a reasonable accommodation that was available at the time the interactive process should have occurred, dooms his claim.

FedEx Resolves Classification Class Action for $228 Million

The judge overseeing a class action lawsuit against FedEx Ground over its classification of certain drivers as independent contractors instead of employees has approved the company’s June-announced $228 million settlement with 2,300 California-based FedEx drivers.

The settlement will resolve the legal battle that’s now stretched a decade, as the original complaint in the case was brought against the LTL giant in 2005. Truck operators for the company claimed their designation as contractors, and not company employees, kept them from being eligible for certain state-required employee benefits like overtime pay and rest breaks.

The settlement covers just the 2,300 drivers that worked at the company in California between 2000 and 2007. Other similar cases in other states will proceed separately, said company spokesperson Perry Colosimo.

The settlement came following an August 2014 ruling against FedEx in the case. The federal 9th Circuit Court of Appeals’ Aug. 27, 2014-issued ruling said the drivers bringing the suit should have been classified as employees.

This July, the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals made a similar in ruling against FedEx involving drivers in Kansas. The federal appeals upheld the Kansas Supreme Court’s 2014 ruling that said 500 drivers based in the Sunflower State were improperly classified as contractors instead of employees. Both the 7th Circuit and 9th Circuit appellate courts would be the last stops before the Supreme Court.

Jury Convicts DME Owner and Operator

A federal jury in Los Angeles convicted the former owner and the former operator of a durable medical equipment supply company of health care fraud charges in connection with a $1.5 million Medicare fraud scheme.

Amalya Cherniavsky, 41, and her husband, Vladislav Tcherniavsky, 46, of Long Beach, California, were both convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud and five counts of health care fraud. Sentencing is scheduled for Dec. 14, 2015, before U.S. District Judge Terry J. Hatter Jr. of the Central District of California, who presided over the trial.

The evidence at trial demonstrated that Cherniavsky owned JC Medical Supply (JC Medical), a purported durable medical equipment (DME) supply company, and that she co-operated the company with her husband, Tcherniavsky. According to the trial evidence, the defendants paid illegal kickbacks to patient recruiters in exchange for patient referrals. The evidence further showed that the defendants paid kickbacks to physicians for fraudulent prescriptions – primarily for expensive, medically unnecessary power wheelchairs – which the defendants then used to support fraudulent bills to Medicare.

According to the evidence presented at trial, between 2006 and 2013, the defendants submitted $1,520,727 in fraudulent claims to Medicare and received $783,756 in reimbursement for those claims.

The case was brought as part of the Medicare Fraud Strike Force, supervised by the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section and the U.S. Attorney’s Office of the Central District of California.  The case was investigated by the FBI, HHS-OIG’s Los Angeles Regional Office and the California Department of Justice.  The case is being prosecuted by Trial Attorneys Blanca Quintero and Kevin R. Gingras of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section.

Since its inception in March 2007, the Medicare Fraud Strike Force, now operating in nine cities across the country, has charged more than 2,300 defendants who have collectively billed the Medicare program for more than $7 billion. In addition, HHS’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, working in conjunction with HHS-OIG, is taking steps to increase accountability and decrease the presence of fraudulent providers.

Assistant Attorney General Leslie R. Caldwell of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, U.S. Attorney Eileen M. Decker of the Central District of California, Special Agent in Charge Chris Schrank of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services-Office of the Inspector General’s (HHS-OIG) Los Angeles Region, Assistant Director in Charge David Bowdich of the FBI’s Los Angeles Division and Special Agent in Charge David Jett of the California Department of Justice’s Bureau of Medi-Cal Fraud and Elder Abuse made the announcement.