Menu Close

Author: WorkCompAcademy

City of Santa Monica Reports 12% Increase in Comp Costs

Workers’ compensation costs continue to rise as the City of Santa Monica spent $6.9 million on injured employees in fiscal year 2013-14. Costs grew 12 percent, or $850,000, over the previous year, according to city risk managers. According to the report in the Santa Monica Daily Press, claim frequency remains high and older city employees in physically demanding jobs are experiencing more severe injuries. These older employees are requiring costly and intensive medical treatment, like back surgeries and knee replacements. Even city officials tasked with handling these matters are having medical problems: Two employees in the Workers’ Compensation Unit were out on extended (non-industrial) medical leave.

“Relative to indemnity payments, the Workers’ Compensation Reform legislation enacted by the State in 2012 increased the permanent disability benefit payment schedule by 30 (percent) over a two year period,” city officials said. Most of the administrative costs stayed the same, with the exception of legal costs, which rose 11 percent. If the worker hires legal representation, city officials said, they are, in turn, required to hire one.

Medical costs made up $3.6 million worth of total costs. Lost wages and residual impacts from injuries comprised another $3.3 million. Of the latter category, about half, $1.6 million, covered temporary disabilities while the other half, about $1.7 million, covered permanent disabilities. There were 86 claims settled last fiscal year compared to 55 settlements in the year before. “The City is controlling what it can,” the report said. “These efforts, however, are not sufficient to offset the financial impact of the internal/external factors dogging the program. Given this, Risk Management staff expects the City’s workers’ compensation costs to continue to rise. There are no ‘magic bullets’ to reverse this trend in the short-term, and as such, the City can expect to increase its contribution to the Workers’ Compensation Self Insurance Fund during the next two-year budget cycle.”

The rising costs, city officials said, are not going to disappear. “Staff predicts this trend will continue into the next two-year budget cycle and result in higher contributions to the Workers’ Compensation Self Insurance Fund,” they said. City officials have, they said, saved some money by making some changes. They are, for instance, returning injured employees to modified positions while they recover. This program saved nearly a quarter million dollars according to the report. “The City also revamped the medical bill review process and selected a new medical bill review provider this past year,” city officials said. “The new provider enables the City to obtain better pricing on medical procedures through accessing more cost-effective insurance plans.” This move saved between $100,000 and $200,000 according to city officials.

New MPN Regulations Take Effect

The changes to theMedical Provider Network (MPN) regulations became effective on August 27, 2014. The Division of Workers’ Compensation (DWC) is required to assign a unique MPN ID number to each approved MPN within 90 days of the effective date of the revised MPN regulations. The assigned MPN ID number for each approved MPN can be found on the DWC website in the “DWC Assignment of Unique Medical Provider Network Identification Numbers” report. Please note an MPN ID number has been assigned to all MPNs that have been approved regardless of their current approval status.

The DWC will no longer accept paper submissions of MPN Applications, Plans for Reapproval, or Notice of Medical Provider Network Plan Modifications. All submissions to the DWC must be on compact discs or flash drives in a word-searchable PDF format. The updated fillable form Cover Page for Medical Provider Network Application or Plan for Reapproval [DWC Mandatory Form – Section 9767.4 – 08/14] and the updated fillable form Notice of Medical Provider Network Plan Modification §9767.8 [DWC Mandatory Form – Section 9767.8 – 8/14] can be found online.

Although the filing of a Notice of Medical Provider Network Plan Modification is only required for a material change to an MPN as set forth in §9767.8, all MPNs must comply with the amended MPN regulations. Current MPNs must be prepared to provide the DWC with an explanation of how they are complying, if requested. For example, MPNs should be able to provide the URL to their Internet website and their roster of treating physicians if requested by DWC. In addition, MPNs should be able to provide MPN medical access assistant contact information if requested by DWC.

The DWC is currently updating the MPN FAQs and will post the revised FAQs soon.

WCAB Rules UR Process Applies to MPN Physicians

Alan Moelleken, M. D., a member of the State Fund’s MPN, recommended that applicant, Rochelle Stock, be furnished with a hospital bed for her home as treatment for her admitted 1990 injury. The request was denied after a 5/13/2014 review by Daniel Weinberg, M. D./ EK Health, the State Fund’s Utilization Review report. At a hearing brought to obtain this recommended care, Stock objected to the admission of the UR report claiming it was “inadmissible because the treatment denied was recommended by a physician in defendant’s Medical Provider Network.” The WCJ ruled the UR report was admissible and denied the request for this medical treatment in a June 20, 2014 Finding and Award.

Applicant filed a petition for reconsideration. The WCAB dismissed the petition for reconsideration, since the WCJ’s determination was not a final order subject to reconsideration. Instead it treated applicant’s petition as seeking removal to the Appeals Board. After removal the WCAB affirmed the WCJ’s Findings and Award in the panel decision of Stock v Camarillo State Hospital.

The WCAB concurred with the WCJ that applicant’s required participation in her employer’s MPN does not prohibit defendant from referring an MPN physician’s request for authorization of medical treatment to UR and Independent Medical Review. Contrary to applicant’s contentions, by its adoption of the MPN system, the Legislature did not evince an intent to preclude a defendant from seeking UR review of an MPN physician’s request for authorization of medical treatment. The law and the implementing administrative rules provide mechanisms for review of disputed treatment recommendations through UR, whether or not the treating physician is in the employer’s MPN. Both the UR provisions and the MPN provisions of the Labor Code provide that a treating physician’s request for authorization of medical treatment must be reviewed by a physician competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues, without distinction as to whether the physician is selected through the MPN. (Cf. Labor Code section 461 O(e) and Labor Code section 20 46 I 6(f).) Similarly, the definition of a primary treating physician in Administrative Director’s Rule 9767.1 and Rule 9785(a)(J) both include a physician within an MPN.

When a defendant does not approve a treatment request from applicant’s primary treating physician, the defendant must refer the request to a UR physician. Here, Dr. Moelleken’s request that applicant be provided a hospital bed was clearly intended to provide applicant relief from the effects of her industrial injury under the terms of her award of further medical treatment. She has had a two level lumbar fusion, suffers from radiculopathy, Grade 2 spondylolisthesis with instability and foraminal stenosis at two levels above the fusion. Applicant cannot sleep on a flat bed and has been sleeping in a recliner. She has been trying to obtain a hospital bed for four years. In all of that time, she has not been able to enjoy a restful night sleep.

The UR denial of the request for a hospital bed was based upon “silence” in the MTUS guidelines, and the absence of “high quality studies” and “no exceptional factors … in the documentation submitted to consider this request as an outlier to the guidelines. There is no other documentation to support the medical necessity of a hospital bed. As such, the medical necessity of the request has not been established and the request is non-certified.”

The WCAB noted that there is a hierarchy of standards to be applied to a review of the medical necessity of a request for approval of medical treatment, under Rule 9792.10.1 ( 4)(A)-(F). If the MTUS is “silent,” and there is no “peer-reviewed scientific and medical evidence,” the reviewer may consider nationally recognized professional standards, expert opinion, generally accepted standards of medical practice and “treatments that are likely to provide a benefit to a patient for conditions for which other treatments are not clinically efficacious.” It does not appear that the UR denial considered whether other standards may be applicable, as there was insufficient documentation or explanation provided to support the efficaciousness of Dr. Moelleken’s request. Further review of this request will be by Independent Medical Review.

New Fibromyalgia Study Points to Mental Mechanisms

In physical injury cases, SB 863 precludes permanent disability awards that add on the effects of psychiatric consequences. It is unclear how far this new law will apply to what begins as a physical injury that is later complicated by a mental rather than a physical cause.

For example, new research summarized in Reuters Health claims that brain scans show that people with the pain disorder fibromyalgia react differently to what others would consider non-painful sights and sounds. The small new study provides clues to what might be going wrong in the nervous system of people with fibromyalgia, along with possible new approaches to alleviating their pain. “If we understand the mechanism, we may come up with new and potentially better forms of treatment,” said lead author Marina López-Solà of the department of Psychology and Neuroscience at the University of Colorado, Boulder.

Fibromyalgia, which patients experience as widespread muscle pain and fatigue, affects as many as five million Americans, most commonly middle-aged women, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its cause is unknown and there is no cure, but medications can treat the symptoms. The new results suggest not only that fibromyalgia is related to greater processing of pain-related signals, but also potentially to a misprocessing of other types of non-painful sensory signals that may be important to address during treatment, Lopez-Sola told Reuters Health by email.

She and her team used “functional magnetic resonance imaging,” which measures blood flow changes in the brain, to assess brain responses among 35 women with fibromyalgia and 25 similar women without the disorder. The fibromyalgia patients were more sensitive to non-painful stimulation compared to people without the disorder, they report in the journal Arthritis and Rheumatism.

What seems to be happening is that the brains of fibromyalgia patients are under-processing certain forms of sensory information at the first stages of processing, but are also amplifying the signal at a later level of sensory integration of multiple sensory inputs, Lopez-Sola said. “When you are in pain, it is probable that you are more concentrated on your own pain than on the tasks you have to pay attention to,” said Dr. Pedro Montoya of the Research Institute on Health Sciences at the Universitat Illes Balears in Palma de Mallorca, Spain, who was not part of the new study. “For me, these findings provide further support for the idea that psychological strategies aimed at changing the focus of attention from the body to external cues could be useful for these patients,” Montoya said.

People with fibromyalgia often also have conditions like depression, so some people believe the disorder has a mental basis, said Michael E. Geisser, professor in the department of physical medicine and rehabilitation at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. But evidence for a neuro-anatomical basis for fibromyalgia is growing, said Geisser, who was not part of the new study. “There is increasing evidence that fibromyalgia is not just a pain condition,” he told Reuters Health by email. “More recent research done on persons with fibromyalgia, such as the research by Lopez-Sola and colleagues, suggests that persons with fibromyalgia suffer from a central processing deficit of multiple types of sensory stimuli, not just pain.” “It’s as if the volume control for sensation in persons with fibromyalgia is turned up, or louder, for many types of sensation compared to persons without the disorder,” he said. That might help explain why many people with fibromyalgia also often suffer from fatigue, cognitive problems or mood disturbance, Geisser said.

Currently, people with the disorder can take anticonvulsant medications, such as pregabalin (Lyrica), and antidepressants such as duloxetine (Cymbalta) and milnacipran (Savella), which have been FDA approved for treating fibromyalgia. Further research to improve understanding of where there are problems in the brain for people with the disorder could lead to the development of new treatments, Geisser said. For example, it would be interesting to see if a treatment targeted at dampening response in an area of the brain that “overreacted” in this study helped to treat fibromyalgia symptoms, he said.

Thus, the evolving scientific concepts of the roots of fibromyalgia may be a precursor to use of the SB 863 limits on psychiatric add-ons to lower permanent disability awards in fibromyalgia cases.

LA County Probation Department Reduces Claims by One Third

Southern California Public Radio – KPCC – reviewed hundreds of Probation Department workers’ compensation files from 2010-2012 and claims it found dozens of questionable cases. Chief Probation Officer Jerry Powers responded by stressing that the vast majority of workers’ compensation claims are legitimate, but he has taken several steps to crack down on questionable injuries since taking office in 2011. Since then, the number of probation staff on disability has dropped by one third, Powers says. Questionable workers’ compensation and disability claims, he says, were one of the first things the L.A. County Board of Supervisors asked him to tackle when he came to probation.

When Powers started on the job, 15 percent of the workforce–about 750 people–were out on workers’ compensation or reassigned due to on-the-job injuries, he says. “It makes my blood boil.” Powers maintains the problem of fraudulent claims is “epidemic” in the department–although officials there say they don’t have hard numbers on the percentage of claims believed to be illegitimate. Cynthia Maluto, who oversees return to work efforts at probation says “I’ve looked up cases where the employee will be off a whole year, come back for one day and then go off another year and come back, file another claim, [and] could be off for two years. And in the 20 years of service they probably worked three months.”

To tackle the problem, the supervisors ordered Powers to use an investigative model first developed by the L.A. County Sheriff’s Department. First, he beefed up the unit that investigates claims. He told the team to “start scrutinizing doctors’ notes, questioning restrictions and limitations and frankly, if necessary, videotaping staff doing things they say they can’t,” Powers recalls. “Before I got here, when employees were injured they could take cruises, they could come and go as they pleased,” he says. “We put in a requirement they have to be home between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m.” Probation now has a dedicated team checking up on employees who are out on workers’ compensation and disability claims. The team makes home visits to make sure employees are there when they should be. It follows up on claims it considers questionable, and can mount challenges based on its investigations.

Alex Rossi of the L.A. County CEO’s office says the number of claims skyrocketed after 2000, when probation officers became eligible for 4850–a law designed to counterbalance the risk of working in public safety with up to one year of full, tax-free salary while on workers’ compensation leave.

Union steward Cline says Powers’ move to crack down on workers who are faking injuries is more about politics than tackling a major departmental problem. Many workers stay out for long stretches simply waiting to get care within the slow-moving workers’ compensation system, Cline says. “I see those cases more than I see the others,” she adds. But the probation department’s management sees qualified success in the crackdown– Powers says since he took office, the number of employees out on workers’ compensation has gone down by roughly one third, from about 750 to about 500. And he says the number of 4850 cases has dropped by 25 percent.

When it comes to gaming the system, probation chief Powers says one of his biggest problems is staff taking out separate private disability policies. “Several times we’ve found employees who will falsify medical notes and send them to these insurance companies and tell them they are injured and off duty for months at a time,” he says. The problem, says Powers, is that “they are not off duty. They are drawing a paycheck at the same time they are collecting a check from these insurance companies. And some of these employees will have two, three, four separate policies.” This can be lucrative, with workers doubling or tripling their salaries, according to Powers. “We know everyone who has those policies and we are working with the insurance companies to cross check those policies,” he says. That cooperation has resulted in the arrests of two probation workers for allegedly collecting disability checks while they were still on the job, Powers says.

Alpha Ambulance Inc. Manager Guilty in $5.5 Million Fraud Conspiracy

The general manager of a Southern California ambulance company pleaded guilty in Los Angeles to conspiracy to commit Medicare fraud, conspiracy to obstruct a Medicare audit, and making materially false statements to law enforcement officers.

Wesley Harlan Kingsbury, 34, of Bloomington, California, pleaded guilty to the charges before U.S. District Judge Dale S. Fischer. Sentencing is scheduled for Feb. 9, 2015.

According to court documents, Kingsbury was the general manager of Alpha Ambulance Inc., which specialized in the provision of non-emergency ambulance transportation services to Medicare beneficiaries, primarily to and from dialysis treatments. Between April 2010 and July 2012, Kingsbury conspired with Alex Kapri and Aleksey (Russ) Muratov, the owners of Alpha Ambulance, as well as the training supervisor Danielle Medina, to bill Medicare for ambulance transportation services for individuals that Kingsbury knew did not need to be transported by ambulance. In addition, as general manager, Kingsbury instructed emergency medical technicians (EMTs) that worked at Alpha Ambulance to conceal the true medical condition of patients they were transporting by altering requisite paperwork and creating false reasons to justify the transportation services.

In early 2012, Medicare notified Alpha Ambulance that the company would be subject to a Medicare audit. In response, Kingsbury and his co-conspirators altered patient documentation to create false justifications for the ambulance transportation services. Kingsbury and others used light tracing tables to trace over original documents and create falsified patient documentation for the purpose of sending those falsified documents to Medicare, and then they used a paper shredder to destroy the original patient documents.

Kingsbury and his co-conspirators submitted $5,522,079 in fraudulent claims to Medicare, and Medicare paid $1,338,413 on those fraudulent claims.

Further according to court documents, in April 2012, Kingsbury was approached by law enforcement officers and was asked to assist with the investigation into Alpha Ambulance. Kingsbury disclosed to the owners of Alpha Ambulance the names of the law enforcement officers who were conducting the investigation and the questions they had asked Kingsbury about the company. On May 1, 2012, Kingsbury falsely denied to the law enforcement agents that he had previously disclosed that information to the owners of Alpha.

Kapri, Muratov and Medina pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit health care fraud on October 28, 2013. They were sentenced to terms of imprisonment of 75 months, 108 months, and 30 months, respectively.

The case was investigated by the FBI and the Los Angeles Region of HHS-OIG and was brought as part of the Medicare Fraud Strike Force, supervised by the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California. The case was prosecuted by Trial Attorneys Blanca Quintero and Alexander F. Porter and Assistant Chief Ben Curtis of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section.

Defense Attorney Prevails in Disgruntled Applicant’s Civil Case

In September 2006, Massoud Kaabinejadian filed a workers’ compensation claim – based on work-related stress and discrimination – which was ultimately denied because his length of employment was only 177 days and less than the six months required by the Labor Code. (Lab. Code, § 3208.3, subd. (d).) Kathaleen Miller served as opposing counsel, representing Rabobank, his employer, and its workers’ compensation insurer. On behalf of her clients, Miller contended Kaabinejadian was properly terminated for aggression toward coworkers and creating a hostile work environment. Miller served a medical record subpoena on Kaabinejadian’s medical provider seeking information about his alleged injuries. After his claim was denied, Miller also prepared and filed a response to his WCAB petition for reconsideration.

In May 2012, Kaabinejadian filed a civil complaint for abuse of process and breach of privacy against Miller. For the first cause of action, he alleged that Miller’s answer to his petition for reconsideration falsely stated that plaintiff had tried to assault a witness, Cheryl Walker, during the workers’ compensation hearing on May 18, 2011. Plaintiff asserted that Miller had made the statements in the answer to retaliate against him. For the second cause of action, plaintiff alleged that Miller had wrongfully subpoenaed his medical records, again as retaliation.

In July 2012, Miller filed a special motion to strike the civil lawsuit pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, asserting that Miller’s litigation conduct constituted participation in a protected activity and plaintiff could not demonstrate a probability of success because Miller’s conduct was subject to the litigation privilege afforded by Civil Code section 47 (“section 47”).

Miller submitted a declaration, describing the facts of her representation during the workers’ compensation proceeding – including that she had subpoenaed medical records from plaintiff’s treating physician and that she had witnessed plaintiff try to assault Walker, the human resources director for Rabobank. In her answer to plaintiff’s petition, Miller stated that plaintiff had demonstrated “anger and aggressive behavior” at the workers’ compensation hearing: “Following the conclusion of testimony by Cheryl Walker . . . the applicant sprang to his feet and attempted to assault the witness. But for the actions of Mr. Miguel Martinez (Pinkerton Consulting and Investigations) and Mr. Chris Solberg (California Highway Patrol), it appeared he would have physically assaulted Mrs. Walker. She fled the courtroom in tears sheltered by Mr. Martinez, while Officer Solberg confined the applicant to his chair.”

In his opposing declaration, plaintiff described Walker’s purported discriminatory treatment of him. He also set forth an account of the years spent litigating his workers’ compensation claim. He contended that Miller had obstructed his discovery efforts, mishandled his medical records, and interfered with his Independent Medical Examination (IME). Plaintiff made numerous efforts to have Miller held in contempt and sanctioned. Plaintiff vehemently disputed Miller’s account of his purported assault on Walker. He denied he was restrained, confined, admonished or criticized for his behavior at the hearing. The recorded minutes for the hearing contain no mention of the attempted assault. Plaintiff asserted that Officer Solberg was prepared to testify in favor of plaintiff. Plaintiff also described his objections to Miller obtaining the records of his treating physician, Dr. Jeffrey Pearson, and disseminating them to non-medical personnel.

After a hearing, the trial court granted defendant’s anti-SLAPP motion based on a determination that Miller “had met her burden of showing that the activity alleged is protected under section 425.16” and that the litigation privilege (section 47) bars plaintiff’s claims. Kaabinejadian appealed the dismissal which was affirmed by the Court of Appeals in the unpublished case of Kaabinejadian v Miller.

“A SLAPP suit – a strategic lawsuit against public participation – seeks to chill or punish a party’s exercise of constitutional rights to free speech and to petition the government for redress of grievances.” (Rusheen v. Cohen (2006) 37 Cal.4th 1048, 1055.) Section 425.16, the anti-SLAPP statute, allows a party to bring a special motion to strike a meritless SLAPP suit at an early stage of the litigation. (Rusheen, at pp. 1055-1056; Dwight R. v. Christy B. (2013) 212 Cal.App.4th 697, 708-709 (Dwight R.).) The protected activities described in subdivision (e)(2) of section 425.16 include statements or writings made “in connection with an issue under consideration or review by a . . . judicial body, or any other official proceeding authorized by law . . . .”

The activity underlying plaintiff’s complaint is Miller’s conduct as defense attorney in a workers’ compensation case. As such, plaintiff’s complaint is based on acts preparatory to or in anticipation of official proceedings. The Court concluded that “Miller’s actions were lawful and fully protected by the litigation privilege under section 47.”

DWC Adjusts DME Fee Schedule

The Division of Workers’ Compensation (DWC) has posted an order adjusting the Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics and Supplies (DMEPOS) section of the Official Medical Fee Schedule to conform to changes in the Medicare payment system as required by Labor Code section 5307.1. The update includes all changes identified in Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Change Request (CR) number 8865.

The order is effective for services on or after October 1, 2014, and can be found on the DWC website. It is the third Medicare update for calendar year 2014.

NFL Legend, Brad Culpepper, Sued in Orange County for Comp Fraud

Tampa attorney Brad Culpepper has made a name for himself on the football field, in the courtroom and on reality television. But now an insurance company filed a civil lawsuit against him accusing him of workers’ compensation fraud.

For nine years, Culpepper went head to head against some of the biggest and strongest players in the National Football League. He parlayed fame on the field into success as a Florida personal injury attorney, living in a multi-million dollar bayfront mansion. Just last year, Culpepper was selected as a cast member for the CBS reality show “Survivor.”

But now a story in Tampa Bay News reports that nearly four years ago, Culpepper filed for workers’ compensation for injuries he suffered playing in the NFL. Doctors who examined him concluded that he was 89 percent disabled, and the insurance company, Fairmont Premier, gave him a $175,000 settlement. But what began as a claim similar to those made by other NFL players as well is now headed to court. In a lawsuit filed in Orange County, Calif., in July, attorneys for the insurance company say Culpepper lied to the doctors. He is “exquisitely fit and conditioned” and “is not disabled,” the suit says. Moreover, the attorneys say, he is feigning injury while taking part in highly publicized athletic competitions. “Defendant Culpepper’s conduct was fraudulent, deceptive and designed to inflate the value of his claim and to take advantage of and abuse the California workers’ compensation system,” the suit states.

Culpepper attorney Scott Schutzman called the insurance company attorneys’ version of events an “exaggeration.” No one disputes that Culpepper, 45, spent nearly a decade in professional football as a human battering ram. From 1992 to 2000, he was a defensive tackle for the Minnesota Vikings, the Bucs and the Chicago Bears. Before that he spent four years playing for the University of Florida, becoming an All­-American lineman and senior captain for the Gators.

After retiring from the NFL in 2001, he got a law degree, shed 75 pounds from his 280-pound frame and became a personal-injury lawyer in Tampa. In 2012, he became the lead plaintiff in a concussion lawsuit with 25 other players against the NFL. Culpepper also began practicing mixed martial arts, a sport that combines elements from a host of fighting styles. But attorneys for the insurance company say that when he was examined by several doctors in regard to his injury claim, he did not tell them about his new hobby. Had the insurer known, it would never have paid, the suit says.

Rather, the lawsuit alleges that Culpepper told physicians he had many injuries, from head and knee trauma to neurological and vision problems. He reported having “quite a bit of difficulty” with “usual work activities, usual hobbies and recreational activities, driving and sleeping” and could not sit for two hours at a time, according to the suit. “When asked if there are things he cannot do, defendant Culpepper testified that ‘everything is difficult,’ ” the lawsuit says.

In 2013, after the claim was settled, Culpepper was a contestant with his wife, Monica, on the reality TV show Survivor: Blood vs. Water, where veterans of the show compete with loved ones. He was eliminated after 14 days. It was “clean, old-school caveman stuff,” he told the Tampa Bay Times.

Schutzman, Culpepper’s attorney, took issue with the narrative in the insurance company’s lawsuit. “This man played in the NFL for 10 years. He has multiple doctors and medical records, including 14 or 15 MRIs, which show injuries to his knees, to his shoulders, to his head,” he said. “He’s had injury after injury after injury.” The fact that his client exercises and has appeared on a reality TV show is not sufficient to prove that he was never injured or does not continue to suffer, Schutzman said. He also disputed the lawsuit’s contention that Culpepper earned a black belt in mixed martial arts. “He doesn’t have a black belt; he has an honorary black belt,” he said.

However, the website for B.A. Warrior Training Center in Tampa lists Culpepper in its Black Belt Club, noting that “you all worked hard to attain your black belts in kickboxing.”

DWC Proposes Revisions to Copy Service Fee Schedule

Following a public hearing on July 1 and a review of comments, the Division of Workers’ Compensation (DWC) has made revisions to its Copy Service Fee Schedule regulations and is revising the proposed regulations for an additional public comment period of 15 days. Members of the public are invited to present written comments regarding the proposed modifications to until 5 p.m. on Wednesday, October 1.

The proposed revisions include:

1) Deleting provisions for fees incurred as a result of “authorizations” from the fee schedule as the fee schedule applies to records subpoenaed by copy services.
2) Adding a requirement for case information to be included in the bills for copy services and changing the use of billing codes to optional.
3) Clarifying that the claims administrator is responsible to pay the actual cost incurred for records obtained by Public Records Act requests from the Workers’ Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau and the Employment Development Department.
4) Clarifying that the claims administrator is not responsible to pay the flat rate when records that are subpoenaed can be obtained through the Public Records Act or were previously obtained by a subpoena by the same party and served from the same source unless there is good cause.
5) Increasing fees for X-rays as a survey showed that these costs often exceeded the Official Medical Fee Schedule.

The regulations can be found online on the DWC regulations page.