Menu Close

Tag: 2024 News

New Mandatory Autobraking Standard Should Reduce Costly Comp Claims

According to recent studies published by the National Council on Workers’ Compensation (NCCI) workers’ compensation has experienced a long-term decline in overall claim frequency, thanks to automation, robotics and continued advances in workplace safety.

However, for WC Motor Vehicle Accident (MVA) claims, the story is quite different, with frequency declining for many years and then suddenly turning upward. These accidents can be very severe and are responsible for a significant portion of fatal WC claims. MVA lost-time claims continue to cost over 80% more than the average lost-time claim, because MVA claims tend to involve severe injuries (e.g., head, neck, and spine).

In its 2020 update, NCCI noted that according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) “the installation of automatic emergency braking (AEB) was part of a voluntary commitment by 20 automakers to equip virtually all new passenger vehicles with low-speed AEB that includes forward collision warning by September 1, 2022. The NHTSA further noted that “manufacturers have made great strides in providing advanced safety to consumers compared to 2018, when only 30% of their new vehicles were equipped with AEB.” The the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety maintains that autobraking is making driving safer, estimating that the technology could cut rear-end collisions in half.

This month the voluntary efforts of these 20 automakers have become a mandatory requirement for all of them.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) finalized Monday a new Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard which makes automatic emergency braking (AEB), including pedestrian AEB, standard on all passenger cars and light trucks by September 2029. According to the agency, this safety standard is expected to significantly reduce rear-end and pedestrian crashes, saving at least 360 lives a year and preventing at least 24,000 injuries annually.

AEB systems use sensors to detect when a vehicle is close to crashing into a vehicle or pedestrian in front and automatically applies the brakes if the driver has not. The new standard requires all cars be able to stop and avoid contact with a vehicle in front of them up to 62 miles per hour and that the systems must detect pedestrians in both daylight and darkness. In addition, the standard requires that the system apply the brakes automatically up to 90 mph when a collision with a lead vehicle is imminent and up to 45 mph when a pedestrian is detected.

In June 2023, the National Safety Council (NSC) supported NHTSA’s notice of proposed rulemaking to require AEB and pedestrian AEB on new passenger cars and light trucks. The standard fulfills a provision in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to establish minimum performance standards requiring that all passenger vehicles be equipped with AEB and also aligns with the Department of Transportation’s National Roadway Safety Strategy, further embracing the Safe System Approach by directly taking a step toward making safer vehicles, a pillar of the holistic approach to roadway safety.

NSC believes the development, design, and accessibility of vehicle technology are key components to addressing the tragic trend of roadway fatalities. Improvements in vehicle safety must take into account risks to both vehicle occupants and non-occupants, and ways to mitigate these risks must be clearly communicated to the public.

Sedgwick Announces its Next Phase of AI Technology

Sedgwick, announced several new updates to its artificial intelligence-powered (AI) technology program, ahead of the upcoming RISKWORLD 2024, the annual conference of RIMS, Sedgwick also said it “remains at the vanguard of technological innovation in the industry with its pioneering generative AI technologies and claims management applications.”

The latest enhancements are significant milestones on Sedgwick’s journey of technology evolution and have been supported by dedicated research and development in predictive modeling, machine learning and now, generative AI. This work has been propelled by the company’s vast global dataset and expert in-house data science and technology teams.

Their goal is to expedite the claims process by predicting, addressing, and automating steps in the claim lifecycle, thereby enhancing consumer experiences, and streamlining claim resolutions. Claim resolution times are expected to decrease, early adopters will swiftly benefit from the technological advancements, and the overall experience for Sedgwick’s consumers and clients will be significantly elevated.

Sedgwick’s technology stack is built around several AI-enhanced tools that comprise a scalable, rapidly deployable platform. Recent enhancements to Sedgwick technologies include:

1- Sidekick+: In April, Sedgwick achieved integration of generative AI tools into its proprietary technology program with a best-in-class claims workflow. New updates to Sidekick+, an industry-first application that integrates Microsoft/OpenAI’s ChatGPT technology with Sedgwick’s established claims management tools, leverage API integration so that claim professionals automatically receive medical document summarizations directly into their claim files.

Sidekick+ has processed 50,000 documents in the initial pilot with greater than 98% accuracy in its summarizations. Sidekick is bundled with Sedgwick’s digital intelligence suite, including predictive models and decision engines, so that AI can prescribe optimal workflows, leading to genuine process transformation. Sedgwick was named by Foundry’s CIO as a 2024 CIO 100 Award winner for Sidekick+, which is a first-of-its-kind application developed by the company’s technology team. Foundry’s CIO 100 award recognizes enterprise excellence and innovation in IT.

2- AI care guidance: Sedgwick has expanded its offerings with the launch of an AI-powered care guidance application to identify claims on workers’ compensation programs with integrated managed care whose progression could benefit from early clinical intervention. The proprietary model uses modern AI, machine learning and natural language processing to rapidly review unstructured data – such as claim notes, correspondence, medical bills, and clinical documentation – and collect meaningful, actionable information for review. By identifying subtle patterns that might otherwise be overlooked,

AI care guidance detects the warning signs of claim severity early in the process and facilitates prompt referrals to appropriate clinical resources.

3-  mySedgwick: With an eye toward continued innovation addressing communication gaps in the claims process, mySedgwick – Sedgwick’s customer-centric self-service tool and virtual guide through the claims journey – has been refreshed with a simplified, mobile- first user experience for U.S. casualty and workforce absence clients and their employees/customers. Today, nearly 70% of claimants use mobile devices to check on their claims and ask questions – up from 30% just three years ago.

AI-backed chat capabilities can address many claims questions in real time or direct claimants to their assigned examiners for more complex queries. This update simplifies the claims experience and meets claimants where they are in the digital realm.

Two California Hospitals Rank “A” and Three Rank “F” in Hospital Ratings

The Leapfrog Group is a non-profit organization in the United States that focuses on patient safety, quality, and transparency in healthcare. It was founded in 2000 by large employers and healthcare experts to work to improve the healthcare system through public reporting initiatives.

For more than 20 years, The Leapfrog Group has collected, analyzed, and published hospital data on safety and quality in order to push the health care industry forward. Leapfrog’s bold transparency has promoted high-value care and informed health care decisions – and helped trigger giant leaps forward in the safety, quality, and affordability of U.S. health care.

Leapfrog just released its spring 2024 Hospital Safety Grades, assigning an “A,” “B,” “C,” “D” or “F” to nearly 3,000 general hospitals on how well they prevent medical errors, accidents and infections. Nationally, patient experience – a set of measures using patient-reported perspectives on hospital care – indicates significant signs of improvement since the fall 2023 Safety Grades, and preventable health care-associated infections show a sustained drop after unprecedented rates during the height of the pandemic.

In addition to assigning letter grades to individual hospitals, The Leapfrog Group also reports best patient safety performance by state and, for the first time, by metro area based on highest percentage of “A” hospitals. In spring 2024, Utah ranks number one among states for the second cycle in a row. The top three metro areas are Allentown (Pennsylvania), Winston-Salem (North Carolina), and New Orleans (Louisiana).

Three California hospitals made the Leapfrog list of the 10 nationwide to receive an “F” grade in The Leapfrog Group’s spring safety rankings, released May 1.

– – Mission Community Hospital (Panorama City)
– – Pacifica Hospital of the Valley (Sun Valley)
– – Providence St. Mary Medical Center (Apple Valley)

There are 15 hospitals Leapfrog has rated with 25 consecutive “A” grades. Two of them are in California.

– – French Hospital Medical Center (San Luis Obispo)
– – Kaiser Permanente Orange County-Anaheim Medical Center

Twice a year, the nonprofit healthcare watchdog organization publishes a letter grade for 3,000 hospitals on how well they prevent medical errors, accidents and infections. Among the 3,000 hospitals evaluated nationwide, fewer than 1 percent received an “F.”

Walmart Announced Closure of 51 Clinics and Exit from Health Care Services

May 1st, 2024, marked a turning point for Walmart’s healthcare ambitions. All 51 Walmart Health clinics in six states will be closed, and the giant retailer will end virtual health care services, the company said Tuesday.

The company had opened these clinics next to its superstores, and offered primary and urgent care, labs, X-rays, behavioral health and dental work. It had expected that it could use its massive financial scale and store base to offer convenient, low-cost services to patients in rural and underserved areas that lacked primary care options.

The decision, came as a shock to many. Just five years ago, Walmart had entered the healthcare scene with a bold promise: to disrupt the system and provide high-quality, low-cost care as an alternative to traditional doctor’s offices. Their clinics offered primary care, urgent care, x-rays, and even dental work, all conveniently located next door to the familiar blue vestibules.

“Health care looks like a big opportunity,” Walmart CEO Doug McMillion said in 2020, shortly after the first clinics opened.

However, the dream of revolutionizing healthcare proved elusive. Walmart cited “challenging reimbursement environments and escalating operating costs” as reasons for the closure. In simpler terms, the clinics just weren’t profitable enough. This echoed a wider trend – Walgreens had recently shuttered a significant number of their own in-store clinics, suggesting that the retail healthcare model might not be sustainable in the current climate.

Ateev Mehrotra, a professor of health care policy and medicine at Harvard Medical School who researches retail health clinics said Walmart’s closures reflect the challenges for primary care providers in the United States.

The closure leaves many patients scrambling for alternatives. Walmart has assured them that existing appointments will still be honored, and they’re working to connect patients with other providers within their insurance networks. However, finding a new doctor, especially in underserved areas, can be a daunting task.

The impact goes beyond patients. Hundreds of healthcare workers, from doctors and nurses to administrative staff, now face an uncertain future. Walmart has offered them the opportunity to transfer to other positions within the company, but for many, this may not be a viable option.

The story of Walmart’s healthcare experiment serves as a cautionary tale. While the goal of affordable, accessible care was noble, the execution proved difficult. The complex landscape of healthcare reimbursement and the high cost of operation ultimately proved insurmountable.

However, Walmart’s exit doesn’t necessarily negate the potential of retail healthcare entirely. It simply underscores the need for a more sustainable model. The future of affordable healthcare access remains an open question, and Walmart’s story serves as a reminder of the ongoing struggle to find a solution that works for everyone.

Sober Living Homes Owner Indicted for $175,000 in Kickback Fraud

The owner and operator of addiction treatment facilities in Orange County has been charged by a federal grand jury indictment alleging he paid nearly $175,000 in illegal kickbacks to so-called “body brokers” in exchange for finding him new patients. He pleaded not guilty on April 29, and trial has been set for June 25th.

57 year old Scott Raffa who lives in Newport Beach, was arrested Saturday at Los Angeles International Airport. Raffa is charged with 12 counts of illegal remunerations for referrals to clinical treatment facilities.

According to the indictment that a grand jury returned on April 10, Raffa operated Orange County-based sober living homes, including Sober Partners Waterfront Recovery Center, Sober Partners Reef House, and Sober Partners Beach House. These facilities treated patient populations that received health care benefits through health insurers.

Raffa allegedly paid thousands of dollars per patient in illegal kickbacks to individuals who referred patients to his facilities, a practice known as “body brokering.” The body brokers in this case each controlled their own business entities and Raffa allegedly paid them kickbacks by depositing checks or wiring money to bank accounts that the brokers controlled. The kickbacks were intended as compensation for the brokers referring patients and to induce the brokers to continue to refer patients to Raffa’s facilities, the indictment alleges.

Raffa allegedly entered into sham contracts with certain body brokers that were designed to conceal the nature of the illicit payments, including by purportedly prohibiting payments from Raffa’s sober living homes based on “volume or value” of the body brokers’ patient referrals.

The brokers and Raffa allegedly met or would communicate via encrypted messaging services to calculate and negotiate the kickback amounts he owed the brokers for patient referrals. The kickback amounts allegedly were based on the insurance revenues that Raffa expected to receive for the respective patients, factoring in each patient’s insurance provider and the duration of the patient’s treatment at one of his sober living homes. Raffa refused to pay the kickbacks unless patients received at least 21 days’ treatment at one of his facilities, according to the indictment.

From April 2020 to October 2021, Raffa paid a total of $174,600 in illegal kickbacks to body brokers, the indictment alleges.

A report by the Orange County Register said that the DOJ’s Sober Home Initiative began in 2021, after O.C. overtook South Florida as the national epicenter for addiction industry fraud. Historically, the Miami area had that dubious distinction, but crackdowns in Florida pushed the problems westward, Assistant U.S. Attorney Benjamin Barron, chief of the Santa Ana Branch Office, said at the time.

Myriad arrests and guilty pleas have resulted from the Sober Home Initiative. Most recently, Kevin M. Dickau, 35, of Tustin, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit health care fraud on April 23 and was sentenced to 15 months in prison and three years of supervised release.

It doesn’t appear that the DOJ is done just yet. Raffa’s indictment mentions mysterious unnamed body brokers, and when we asked if there’d be more indictments coming, spokesperson Ciaran McEvoy said, “We have no comment.” The vast majority of addiction treatment facilities in the state are here in Southern California.

Business Owner to Pay $688K in Restitution for Comp Insurance Fraud

On July 10, 2016, a Pro-Care Building Maintenance employee was injured while on the job and a workers’ comp claim was filed with one of the company’s insurance carriers. During a review of the claim, it was reportedly found that Pro-Care underreported payroll and failed to report the end of policy payroll to the insurance company as the policy required.

The California Department of Insurance investigation further discovered that the company owner,Jorge Maldonado, failed to report payroll and employees of Pro-Care to three insurance carriers from 2017 through 2019. The alleged unreported payroll was over $5 million.

Maldonado was charged with three felony counts of insurance fraud after allegedly underreporting payroll and employees to illegally save on workers’ compensation insurance premiums, resulting in a $687,560 loss to three insurance carriers.

The Sacramento County District Attorney’s office announcedthat on April 18, 2023, Maldonado was convicted of felony workers’ compensation insurance fraud.

At a restitution hearing in April 2024, the Honorable Tami Bogert ordered Maldonado to pay $687,560.96 in restitution to the victims.

Insurance fraud of this nature puts employees of the company at risk if they are injured on the job. It also illegally reduces costs for the fraudster, allowing them to undercut honest employers on job bids. This results in unfair competition and hurts not only other companies within the industry, but also consumers who have fewer choices and less reputable companies to choose from.

Resolving Contested 5500.5 Election Requires Evidentiary Record

Applicant Abate Villalpando alleged injury to his head, neck, back, psyche, headaches, internal [system], and in the form of sleep disorder, while employed during the period February 1, 2016 to October 15, 2017 by G Burger, insured by Employers Preferred Insurance Company and State Farm Insurance Company administered by Sedgwick CMS; Golden Road Food Services DBA Fresh Brothers Pizza by Liberty Mutual; and Garden Fresh Restaurants DBA Souplantation by Travelers Insurance Company.

Defendants denied all liability for applicant’s claim. On June 13, 2023, the parties prepared a Pre-trial Conference Statement, indicating the need for adjudication of multiple issues, including injury AOE/COE.

On August 8, 2023, applicant filed a Notice of Election as against G. Burger and State Farm. On the same day, parties appeared at Mandatory Settlement Conference, and the matter was set for trial on September 13, 2023.

On September 13, 2023, the parties appeared at trial. However, applicant was unavailable, and the WCJ continued the matter to another trial date. The WCJ further issued a minute order, as follows: “AA’s Election against G Burger under the coverage of State Farm is presently DENIED due to objection to election by State Farm and also because this case involves multiple employers and carriers for a CT claim that may extend past the alleged period and also because the terminal employer/carrier is not G Burger and State Farm.”

On September 27, 2023, applicant filed a Petition for Removal from the WCJ’s September 13, 2023 order denying election.

On October 11, 2023, the WCJ issued an Order Vacating Denial of Election pursuant to WCAB Rule 10955(d) (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10955(d)), in which the WCJ vacated the minute order denying applicant’s election, and substituted the following: “AA’s Election against G Burger under the coverage of State Farm is DEFERRED pending adjudication at trial of this threshold issue due to objection to election by State Farm and the need to determine whether the applicant’s alleged CT injury is AOE/COE.”

On October 19, 2023, applicant filed the instant Petition for Removal in response to the WCJ’s amendment of the minute order. Applicant avers his election “falls squarely within the language and legislative purpose of Labor Code § 5500.5,” and that he “should be permitted to proceed against one defendant only, G Burger, as elected, whereas the remaining defendants lose no rights whatsoever except that they must await issuance of applicant’s award prior to contribution issues.”

The WCAB granted the Petition for Removal and affirmed the Order, except that it amend it to reflect that the issue of applicant’s election is deferred pending the creation of an evidentiary record. The WCAB then returned this matter to the WCJ for further proceedings and decision in the panel decision of Villalpando v G Burger -ADJ10620763 (April 2024)

State Farm has filed an Answer, averring that “applicant’s right to elect one defendant is not unfettered; in fact, the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Judge can decline even to allow an election in his or her discretion” citing Schrimpf v. Consolidated Film Industries, Inc. (1977) 42 Cal.Comp.Cases 602 (appeals board en banc)). State Farm contends that the fact that it has five more days of coverage than codefendant Employers Preferred Insurance Company “is not a compelling basis under which to elect against a carrier when considering that for the duration of the case, applicant had engaged in direct litigation and discovery with Employers.”

The WCAB panel noted that “It is the responsibility of the parties and the WCJ to ensure that the record is complete when a case is submitted for decision on the record. At a minimum, the record must contain, in properly organized form, the issues submitted for decision, the admissions and stipulations of the parties, and admitted evidence.” (Hamilton v. Lockheed Corp. (2001) 66 Cal.Comp.Cases 473, 476 [2001 Cal. Wrk. Comp. LEXIS 4947] (Appeals Board en banc)

Here, the record does not adequately set forth the arguments advanced by the parties, or the evidence relied upon by the WCJ in determining initially to deny applicant’s election pursuant to section 5500.5, and later to defer the election.”

Nursing Home Chain and Executives to Pay Over $7 Million

The United States and the State of California have reached a $7,084,000 civil settlement with Monrovia-based ReNew Health Group LLC, ReNew Health Consulting Services LLC, and two corporate executives for knowingly submitting false Medicare Part A claims for nursing home residents.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, to conserve hospital beds, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services waived the requirement that a person must have had a hospital stay of at least three days (signaling an acute illness or injury) before reimbursing for skilled care in a nursing home.

The United States and the State of California alleged that the defendants knowingly misused this waiver by routinely submitting claims for nursing home residents when they did not have COVID-19 or any other acute illness or injury, but merely had been near other people who had COVID-19.  Under the settlement, the defendants will pay $6,841,727 to the United States and $242,273 to the State of California, plus interest.

“False claims are anathema to the Medicare system, especially during a public health crisis,” said United States Attorney Martin Estrada of the Central District of California. “This settlement agreement highlights my office’s determination to ensure our nation’s health care programs help those who actually need them.”

“The Department of Justice is committed to protecting the integrity of taxpayer-funded programs,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian M. Boynton, head of the Department of Justice’s Civil Division. “We will hold accountable those who sought to defraud such programs during the COVID-19 pandemic, including those who knowingly misused emergency waivers for personal gain.”

This investigation was prompted by a lawsuit filed under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act, which permit private parties to sue on behalf of the government to redress false claims for government funds and to receive a share of any recovery.  The settlement agreement in this case provides for the whistleblower, Bay Area Whistleblower Partners, to receive $1,204,280, plus interest, as its share of the settlement.  The case is captioned United States and State of California ex rel. Bay Area Whistleblower Partners v. ReNew Health Group LLC et al., No. 2:20-cv-09472 (C.D. Cal.).

Assistant United States Attorney Karen Y. Paik of the Civil Division’s Civil Fraud Section and Senior Trial Counsel Albert P. Mayer of the Justice Department’s Civil Division, Commercial Litigation Branch, Fraud Section are handling this matter with assistance from the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General and the California Department of Justice’s Division of Medi-Cal Fraud and Elder Abuse.

The claims settled by the United States and the State of California are allegations only, and there was no determination of liability.

Tustin Man to Serve 15 Months in Prison for Patient Brokering

A Tustin California man was sentenced to 15 months in prison for his role in a conspiracy to broker patients as part of a multistate patient scheme in which he directed recruiters to bribe drug-addicted individuals to enroll in drug rehabilitation and received referral fees from the rehabilitation centers.

35 year old Kevin M. Dickau pleaded guilty by videoconference before U.S. District Judge Peter G. Sheridan to an information charging him with one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud. Judge Sheridan imposed the sentence on April 23, 2024.

Six other individuals have previously pleaded guilty for their roles in the scheme: Peter Costas; Seth Logan Welsh; John C. Devlin; Akikur Mohammad; Lauren Philhower; and Anastasia Passas.

According to documents filed in the case and statements made in court:, Dickau, Welsh, Devlin, and their conspirators owned and operated a marketing company in California. Dickau, Welsh, and Devlin used the marketing company to help orchestrate a scheme in New Jersey, Maryland, California, and other states that involved bribing individuals addicted to heroin and other drugs to enter into drug rehabilitation centers so Dickau, Welsh, Devlin, and their conspirators could generate referral fees from those facilities.

Two facilities in California that paid such referral fees were owned or operated by Mohammad, Philhower, and Passas. One located in Los Angeles, the other in Santa Ana. California Insurance code section 750 criminalizes receiving or paying remuneration for referrals to any person or entity that bills claims under insurance policies, which includes recovery homes, clinical treatment facilities, and laboratories.

The marketing company run by Dickau, Welsh, and Devlin maintained contractual relationships with drug treatment facilities around the country, including the ones run by Mohammad, Philhower, and Passas. The marketing company also engaged a nationwide network of recruiters – including Costas in New Jersey – to identify and recruit potential patients, from New Jersey and other states, who were addicted to heroin or other drugs and who had robust private health insurance.

To convince drug-addicted individuals to travel to and enroll in rehabilitation when they otherwise would not have, Costas and other recruiters offered to bribe them – often as much as several thousand dollars – with the approval of Dickau, Welsh, and Devlin.

Once the patients agreed to enroll in drug rehabilitation in exchange for the offered bribe, Dickau, Welsh, Devlin, and Costas would arrange and pay for cross-country travel to the drug treatment centers in California and other states, in concert with the owners of the facilities themselves, including Mohammad, Philhower, and Passas. Costas would stay in touch with the New Jersey patients at the facilities and specifically instruct them to stay at the facilities long enough to generate referral payments, and he would pass along information to Dickau, Welsh, and Devlin about the patients’ status at the facilities.

Dickau, Welsh, and Devlin would monitor the other patients they brokered by speaking to other recruiters or to the owners and employees of the drug treatment facilities themselves.

The drug treatment facilities run by Mohammad, Philhower, and Passas had contracts with the marketing company. Those facilities typically paid the marketing company a fee of $5,000 to $10,000 per patient referral. Dickau, Welsh, Devlin, and their conspirators shared that money among themselves. Costas and other recruiters received approximately half that amount for each patient they brokered. Dickau, Welsh, Devlin, and their conspirators brokered scores of patients to drug treatment facilities around the country, including the ones run by Mohammad, Philhower, and Passas, and the conspiracy caused millions of dollars of losses for health insurers.

In addition to the prison term, Judge Sheridan sentenced Dickau to three years of supervised release.

UFW Announces a Mini-Series Documentary on Farmworker Risks & Dangers

Founded in 2006, the UFW Foundation is a nonprofit organization that advocates for workers’ rights and protections for farm workers across the United States and provides educational outreach and critical services such as immigration legal services to low-income rural communities.

KVPR announced a new documentary series released this week by the United Farm Worker Foundation highlights how farm laborers face a wide range of risks and dangers while harvesting the nation’s crops, from sweltering temperatures to more frequent natural disasters

The five-part mini-series, called Farm Worker Voices, aims to show how climate change affects the everyday lives of agricultural laborers, and spotlights the stories of farmworkers across the country who are directly affected. The UFW Foundation is releasing a video every week until May 20.

“They’re extremely vulnerable to heat, illness and death. They’re vastly affected by climate change,” says Daniel Larios, a spokesperson for the foundation.

Two farmworkers from the San Joaquin Valley are featured in the series.

Elizabeth Ramirez, 44, from Bakersfield, talks in one video about the impacts brought on by last year’s record-breaking floods. Heavy rainfall from a series of record atmospheric rivers drenched the state and flooded farms.

“Before the floods, I’d never seen such a widespread loss of work,” Ramirez says in Spanish. “We couldn’t pay our bills or provide for our kids.”

Adela Leon, a 43-year-old farmworker from Fowler, speaks about another challenge for farmworkers – pesticides – and how a lack of protections from pesticide drift affected her while she was pregnant. “Sometimes [our bosses] don’t tell us what kind of chemical is being sprayed,” Leon says in Spanish. “I started having heart problems. My son was born with asthma and other health issues.”

Last year Regulators with the California Department of Pesticide Regulation filed suit in Kern County Superior Court against a company, known as Agra Fly, which drops pesticides onto agricultural fields using planes and helicopters. A judge temporarily ordered the company to stop aerially applying pesticides. Regulators say its operations resulted in at least six incidents of illegal drift, which is when a pesticide travels from its target area onto an unintended one.

“Defendants’ activities are a public nuisance that endanger the life, wellbeing, and property of the community. Each day that [Agra Fly] conduct aerial pesticide applications, the significant threat to the community exists,” reads the complaint.

In the last year, DPR took disciplinary action and then entered into a legal settlement with another company, Hollister-based TriCal Inc., following nine incidents and 61 violations in multiple Central California counties.

The documentary also calls attention to workers who have labored under scorching temperatures – an issue the Valley is familiar with. A farmworker reportedly died last August of heat exhaustion.

The UFW Foundation, through the series, is calling on state and federal agencies to implement stronger regulations to protect workers such as a national heat standard, pesticide bans, and more widely available relief programs. While there are some protections for outdoor workers in California, there is no federal heat standard.

“Climate change is real,” Larios of the foundation says. “We need to do more to support our farmworkers.”