Menu Close

Tag: 2016 News

Santa Barbara Contractor Faces Fraud Charges

A criminal complaint filed in Santa Barbara Superior Court against Mark Melchiori alleges the former president of Melchiori Construction Company committed 47 felonies from 2006-2013. The company has faced multiple lawsuits from 2011-2012, which alleged it did not pay its creditors and subcontractors on time.

In the District Attorney’s Office indictment, Melchiori, 49, is charged with embezzlement, insurance and wage fraud, violating the unemployment insurance code, diverting construction funds, and committing as well as conspiring to commit grand theft. The charges carry one special allegation of aggravated white-collar crime – taking over $150,000 – and two more special allegations – taking over $100,000 and $200,000, respectively.

The complaint includes 15 charges alleging Melchiori diverted over $350,000 worth of construction funds received from filmmaker Robert Zemeckis between July 2010 and May 1, 2016. The complaint further charges Melchiori deceived the filmmaker out of property worth $53,876.

One count charges Melchiori “directed employees to misclassify employee job duties and nature of work performed by Melchiori Construction Company” on paperwork filed with Everest National Insurance Company, which lowered the premiums paid to Everest by $52,008.

Melchiori is also accused of withholding disability fund deductions from his workers, refusing to make required unemployment tax contributions, and ordering workers not to report all wages made by employees. He’s charged with stealing wages from 14 employees and discouraging one to file a workers’ compensation claim.

The DA’s Office, the Sheriff’s Office, the California Department of Industrial Relations, and the Division of Labor Standards investigated the case. Chief Deputy District Attorney Kelly Scott and real estate fraud attorney Casey Nelson are prosecuting Melchiori, who posted bail. Pending his July 5arraignment, it is unclear who is representing him.

Lawmakers Seek Investigations of Comp Medical Fraud

A California lawmaker says “something needs to be done” about widespread medical fraud in the state’s workers’ compensation system and called on a state commission Tuesday to launch an in-depth review of the matter. The story published by the Center for Investigative Reporting says that Sen. Tony Mendoza asked for a review of what the state is doing to combat what he deemed unsettling questions raised by a recent series of articles by the organization.

“It was actually very disturbing,” Mendoza said in an interview, “just the abuses that occur from individuals who want to make money from the system on the backs of these injured workers.”

The Reveal investigation found that more than 100,000 injured workers in California have encountered medical providers who are currently facing charges for fraud. The workers have undergone risky spinal surgeries spurred by millions in kickbacks and have endured tests and treatments by providers who’ve admitted to prescribing them for profit.

Multiple schemes seek to bypass the state’s system of checks and balances over medical treatment. They do so by soliciting injured workers, many of whom speak only Spanish, to go straight to the clinics of providers who seek payment for services in workers’ compensation courts.

Mendoza, a Cerritos Democrat, asked the California Commission on Health and Safety and Workers’ Compensation to examine whether the state has enough tools, resources and data-analysis capacity to effectively combat the fraud problem.

“It is imperative that that we determine whether there are any regulatory or legislative solutions to fix and prevent such fraud in the workers compensation system,” he said in a statement issued Tuesday.

Mendoza’s call for a review came as Gov. Jerry Brown’s cabinet-level secretary for the Labor & Workforce Development Agency asked the state’s Department of Industrial Relations, which oversees workers’ compensation, to convene a working group to examine fraud in the system.

In a letter sent Tuesday to Christine Baker, the department’s director, Secretary David Lanier cited recent investigations, indictments and convictions that demonstrate “significant remaining challenges” in workers’ compensation. He called on the group to formulate “a set of comprehensive and strategic policy recommendations for consideration by the Governor and the Legislature.” Lanier’s spokesman said the secretary declined to comment and would let the letter speak for itself.

In May, Assemblyman Tom Daly, an Anaheim Democrat, asked the state auditor’s office to examine fraud in workers’ compensation, citing some of the specific findings in the recent news series. Daly’s office said the request, which was dropped from a legislative hearing earlier in May, is expected to go forward in August. A panel of lawmakers will decide whether the questions Daly raises merit an audit costing an estimated $333,600.

In a recent interview with Reveal, Mendoza said he has held hearings about the workers’ compensation system, and the testimony tends to feature a range of interests with varied grievances. Workers decry treatment denials, service providers rail against payment delays and employers complain about fraud.

“It’s a subject that you kind of throw your hands up in the air at times and say, ‘What can we do?’ ” he said. “You could just turn around and walk away, and I don’t want to do that. I do want to be more hands-on and try to solve the problem.”

Reveal examined more than a dozen criminal prosecutions against nearly 100 health providers accused of exploiting injured workers. The cases include one against a company accused of paying doctors millions in kickbacks to dispense unregulated pain creams that allegedly caused the death of a baby. Others accuse alleged medical mills of prescribing hectic schedules of treatment to every injured worker, regardless of his or her injury.

Several cases describe operations that rely on the state’s medical lien system for payments. California’s workers’ compensation system allows health care providers to bill for services outside of the state’s medical review channels and negotiate payment in a string of 24 workers’ compensation courts throughout the state. The Reveal investigation found that the number of medical liens is back up to the level it was at several years ago, even though lawmakers passed a law to tackle the problem in 2012.

CWCI 2016 IMR Study Confirms 2015 Trends

A new CWCI review of California’s Independent Medical Review (IMR) decisions from the first quarter of 2016 show results that are remarkably consistent with those found in CWCI’s study of 2015 IMR determination letters, with volume holding steady at an annualized rate of 160,000 letters, uphold rates at 89 percent and prescription drug requests (40 percent of which were for opioid painkillers and compounded drugs) continuing to represent nearly half of all medical service requests that undergo IMR.

Following adoption of emergency regulations governing the process, Independent Medical Reviews took effect for medical disputes on claims for all dates of injury in July 2013. In January 2014, CWCI conducted an examination of the first 1100 IMR determination letters issued in 2013, which was followed in April 2015 by an analysis of the more than 137,000 IMR decision letters that had been issued in 2014.

Earlier this year, the Institute conducted a follow-up study based on the 2015 IMR decision letters which found that the number of IMR decision letters had increased 19 percent to more than 163,000 in 2015. That study also noted that 39 percent of those letters included decisions on multiple service requests, so that altogether the letters issued in 2015 encompassed decisions on more than 304,000 medical service requests. This report extends the Institute’s IMR research series by providing an initial look at 2016 IMR experience, using data from IMR determination letters issued in the first qua1ter of this year.

In each of the past three quarters, Maximus issued approximately 40,000 letters containing determinations of medical necessity for up to 76,480 individual services. This annualizes to 160,000 letters and more than 300,000 service requests.

The first quarter 2016 IMR letters upheld the utilization review physicians’ UR modifications and denials of services 88.8 percent of the time, which is consistent with the 88.6 percent uphold rate noted in the analysis of 2015 IMR outcomes. This consistently high uphold rate shows that the vast majority of the disputed modifications and denials made by UR physicians continue to be found to be in line with the evidence-based medicine guidelines.

Almost 60 percent of the first quarter 2016 IMR decisions involved claims with a date of injury prior to the IMR program’s 2013 inception, but as in prior studies, claim age had no effect on the IMR uphold rate.

The regional distribution also was stable between 2015 and the first quarter of 2016, with 47.6 percent of the disputed services that went through IMR originating in Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Imperial Counties and 20.5 percent originating in the Bay Area. The percentage of UR decisions that were upheld by the IMR physicians ranged from 84.9 percent in San Diego to 91 percent in Los Angeles County.

Pharmaceutical services remain the highest volume category under review, followed by physical therapy; durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics and supplies; and injections. As in 2014 and 2015, surgery represented less than 5 percent of the disputed service requests that underwent IMR in the first quarter of 2016.

Among the various categories of drugs that underwent IMR, opioids remained at the top of the list, accounting for 29 percent of all pharmaceutical requests for which IMR decisions were issued in the first quarter of 2016, followed by musculoskeletal therapy drugs (12 percent) and compounded drugs, which as in 2015, accounted for 11 percent of all prescription drug IMRs. In nearly 90 percent of the IMR cases involving opioids, the IMR physician agreed with the UR physician’s determination that the use, strength, quantity or duration of the opioid prescription was not medically necessary, while in 97.7 percent of the IMRs involving compounded drugs, the UR physician’s modification or denial was upheld.

As in the prior studies, the latest results show that a small number of medical providers accounted for a disproportionate share of the disputed medical service requests. The 10 individual physicians who were named in the most IMR letters issued in the first quarter of 2016 were associated with 11 percent of the disputed medical service requests; while the top 1 percent of medical providers (56 individuals) were linked to 31 percent of the disputed services; and the 553 physicians who comprised the top 10 percent were involved in 76 percent of the disputed services that went through IMR.

Pacific Pain Care Office Manager Also Arrested and Faces 27 Years

The office manager, who worked with a Salinas doctor arrested and charged with 37 felonies in mid-May, is now facing 23 felonies of her own.

Maria “Aloha” Eclavea was arraigned this week on 23 felony insurance charges related to her role working with Dr. Steven Mangar in an alleged complex insurance fraud scheme, according to the Monterey County District Attorney’s Office.

The charges against Mangar include submitting fraudulent health insurance claims and billings, furnishing drugs to an addict, unlawful prescription of medicine to patients who didn’t have the condition for which it was intended, and enhancements alleging Mangar’s conduct resulted in him fraudulently taking more than $500,000. The unlawful prescribing charges involve prescriptions Mangar wrote at Pacific Pain Care and include oxycodone, hydrocodone, morphine, Dilaudid, and other highly addictive and dangerous medications.

Eclavea was the office manager of Pacific Pain Care Institute.The charges against Eclavea allege submitting fraudulent health insurance claims and billings. Her bail was set at $500,000 and, if convicted, she faces a maximum sentence of 27 years in prison. Her preliminary hearing has been set for June 9.

Dr. Mangar was charged, arrested and arraigned in May for allegedly billing for services that he did not provide, knowingly providing false statements for his financial gain, prescribing controlled substances to an addict, and unlawfully prescribing controlled substances without a legitimate medical purpose. He pleaded not guilty to the charges.

Mangar’s bail was set at $1 million, and a friend already bailed the doctor out of jail.

The Healthcare Fraud Unit of the Monterey County District Attorney’s Office prosecutes prescription drug fraud by medical providers in Monterey County. The unit also investigates and prosecutes other cases including use of another’s identity to secure healthcare benefits, embezzlement. unlawful solicitations/referrals, fraudulent billing; inflated or falsified pharmacy billings, out-patient surgery center fraud, and fraudulent disability claims.

Any patient or insurance company that believes it may have been a victim of this fraud or criminal conduct is asked to contact the Monterey County District Attorney’s Office at (831) 883-7508.

City of Pasadena Reviews Workers’ Compensation Administration Cost Savings

In September 2011, the City of Pasadena contracted with Keenan and Associates to provide third party administration of the City’s workers’ compensation claims. The contract term with Keenan expires on June 30, 2016: Consequently; staff prepared and issued a new Request for Proposals in February,2016. A total of nine responses were received by the deadline of February 29, 2016. AdniinSure was chosen as the successor administrator for contract award.

As part of the City Counsel review of the proposed new award, Richard F. Kunz, Human Resources Manager for Employee Relations, Workers’ Compensation and Safety, recently provided details on the workers’ compensation program in a document as reported by Pasadena Now. He was responding to queries from the City Council during its regular meeting on May 9.

He reported that a single vendor contracted by Pasadena’s Human Resources Department has managed to save the city close to $925,000 on medical billings for worker’s compensation claims during the 2016 fiscal year. The vendor charged the city just $11,260.

A bill review service that looks at every bill received from a service provider to determine that all invoices are not only necessary and appropriate but that the City also receives the lowest medical costs possible for the services provided. The bill review service is currently being provided by Lien on Me, which in fiscal year 2016 has so far reviewed 890 bills has saved the City up to $924,721 in billed costs. The amount is 76 percent of total provider charges – out of $1,210,880 total provider charges submitted to the city, the city only paid $286,159 after Lien on Me reviewed the bills.

The city paid Lien on Me just $11,260 for bill review services for the current fiscal year.

The third vendor that’s helping reduce costs for the human resources department is a Nurse Case Management company, ISYS Solutions Inc., that supervises and manages medical services as needed when the city believes cases are not receiving sufficient attention by service providers.

ISYS is paid as a provider through individual claims.

Kunz also reported on the city’s Return to Work Program, where city employees with temporary work restrictions – either illness or injury – are assigned to modified or alternative work assignments, instead of not working at all and collecting temporary disability benefits.

Through the program, the city’s temporary disability costs are reduced and employees continue to be engaged in productive work as they recover from their illness or injury.

Sixty-nine employees have served in modified assignments so far in fiscal year 2016, with an estimated 163 days of lost work time recovered.

DA Refiles Criminal Complaint Against Kareem Ahmed

The Orange County District Attorney has refiled a felony complaint against Kareem Ahmed, Andrew Jarminski, Michael Rudolph and Norma Garner. The new filing follows a Court of Appeal victory for the defendants earlier this year. This new filing will be round two of the major legal battle.

In 2014 an Orange County Grand Jury indicted 45-year-old Kareem Ahmed and 14 others, alleging he formulated topical creams and oversaw an extensive network of kickbacks that paid doctors and pharmacists more than $25 million to prescribe and distribute the products. Ahmed, president of Ontario company Landmark Medical Management, and the others faced a total of 44 counts on felony charges including conspiracy, trading rebates for patient referrals, insurance fraud and involuntary manslaughter, according to the original two grand jury indictments. The amounts individual doctors received between 2010 and 2013 allegedly ranged from $600,000 to more than $2.5 million. Among those Ahmed allegedly paid were Daniel Capen, M.D. (more than $2.5 million); Andrew Jarminski, M.D. (more than $1.9 million); pharmacist Michael Rudolph (more than $1 million); and Rahil Kahn, M.D. (more than $1 million), according to the indictment.

The grand jury was instructed that it had to unanimously find a defendant committed only a single act encompassed within the count to return a true bill on that count. After the grand jury found the indictments to be true, defendants demurred in the trial court, resulting in the People amending the indictments to add hundreds of new counts – a separate count for each victim – and adding an additional allegation in a single count of involuntary manslaughter.

The defendants moved to set aside the amended indictments on the ground the grand jury had not made separate findings as to each victim, but instead had been instructed to find only one act. Defendants posited that the amendments thus impermissibly changed the offenses charged by the grand jury in violation of Penal Code section 1009. As to the involuntary manslaughter count, the defendants contended the new allegation, embedded in the single charge of involuntary manslaughter, also impermissibly changed the offense charged by the grand jury. The court denied the motion.

The Court of Appeal reversed and remanded in the case of Kareem Ahmed v Superior Court.

The Court of Appeal ruled that “there is no logical basis upon which we can conclude that the grand jury made a finding as to each of the new counts in the amended indictment. The additional counts are new offenses, not shown to be found by the grand jury, and thus changed the offenses charged in violation of section 1009. Accordingly, the indictment was ‘not found, endorsed, and presented as prescribed in’ the Penal Code….. Based on our conclusion that adding multiple counts of insurance fraud changed the offense charged in violation of section 1009, we will grant the petition for writ of mandate setting aside most of the charges in the two indictments.”

After this ruling by the Court of Appeal, one of the problems prosecutors will face is a claim that the case is now barred by statute of limitations. However the refiled felony complaint alleges that some of the “overt acts” upon which the felony charges are based continue to occur up through April 16, 2016 as the defendants continue to pursue collection of their liens. Prosecutors for example allege that “between 6/27/14 and 12/31/15 Ahmed paid $800,000 in lien activation or filing fees to collect on over $58 millions dollars in false claims generated based on kickbacks to medical providers.” And that “Ahmed employed the Blue Law Group, and Michael Blue, to aggressively collect on these false claims.” And despite “a Court order by the workers compensation appeals board Judge, Norma Garner and Michael Blue, at Ahmed’s direction, continued to hide the terms of Ahmed’s agreements with various physicians and pharmacists on 3/10/16 and 4/14/16 in Case # ADJ2262813, Applicant: Oscar Arreola in order to continue to collect on these false claims”.

it is further alleged by prosecutors pursuant to Penal Code section 803(b) that a previous prosecution of defendants for the same conduct commenced within the meaning of Section 804(a), namely, an indictment or information was filed, and was pending which protects the case from the running of the statute of limitations..

DWC Announces Passing of WCALJ Rosa Moran

The Department of Industrial Relations and the Division of Workers’ Compensation with great sadness announced the passing of Workers’ Compensation Judge Rosa Moran, who died unexpectedly this past weekend. She was reportedly on medical leave from the Oakland office where she served as a workers’ compensation judge.

Rosa Moran’s state career spanned 11 years. She joined DWC as a workers’ compensation judge in 2005, and led DWC as Administrative Director from July 2011 to September 2012 when she resigned that position. Prior to her state service, Moran was a workers’ compensation applicant attorney in private practice from 1988 to 2005. As head of DWC, Moran managed a staff of over 1,000 and a budget of $155 million.

She was an active lecturer at attorney conferences and risk management seminars, served as a judge liaison member of the Bay Area Bench and Bar Association and was the author of many seminal decisions in the workers’ compensation arena. She received her undergraduate degree from University of the Pacific in Stockton and a law degree from the University of San Francisco School of Law.

Moran was part of a statewide fact-gathering tour with DIR Director Christine Baker. The pair were reportedly involved in negotiations to produce a workers’ comp proposal in secret, working with labor and a handful of large, self-insured employers.The proposal became Senate Bill 863.

She was well respected and well liked in the workers’ compensation community.

Two Northern Cal Physicians Indicted in Fraud Case

A federal grand jury indicted Dr. Vilasini M. Ganesh and Dr. Gregory Belcher last week for conspiracy to commit health care fraud, health care fraud, conspiracy to commit money laundering, and money laundering. Dr. Ganesh is a family practitioner and Dr. Belcher is an orthopedic surgeon.

According to the indictment, between 2009 and continuing through at least September 2014, Ganesh, 46, of Saratoga, Calif., together with her partner, Belcher, 54, also of Saratoga, engaged in a scheme to defraud insurance companies administering health care benefit programs (“HCBPs”). As alleged in the indictment, Ganesh and Belcher used their Saratoga medical practice, Campbell Medical Group (“CMG”), to unlawfully enrich themselves. Ganesh and Belcher are alleged to have submitted false and fraudulent claims to the HCBPs, concealed the submission of false and fraudulent claims to the HCBPs, and diverted proceeds of the fraud for their personal use. In addition, Ganesh allegedly submitted and caused to be submitted to HCBPs claims for services that she knew were not properly payable because she included (1) false codes that artificially inflated both the seriousness of the patient’s condition as well as the time that the physician spent examining the patient; (2) false diagnoses in the claims that did not correspond with the true health and presentation of the patient; (3) claims for days when the patient had not been seen by the provider; and (4) representations that the patients were seen by another physician provider (not herself) no longer affiliated with Dr. Ganesh and her practice at CMG.

The indictment further alleges that Ganesh compounded these illegal acts by misrepresenting, concealing, and hiding or directing her subordinates to misrepresent, conceal, or hide, acts done in furtherance of the scheme. Specifically, when approached by representatives of the HCBPs, or the patients themselves, to provide documentation or additional information to substantiate the claims that were being submitted at her direction and on her behalf, Ganesh either directed her office staff to have no further discussions with anyone about the claims or to simply resubmit the false information, all to avoid disclosing the truth of the underlying the scheme. Furthermore, the indictment alleges Ganesh, together with the assistance and knowledge of Belcher, submitted hundreds of claims for reimbursement from the HCBPs for: (i) days that were weekends when the CMG office located in Saratoga was closed; (ii) days on which the patient denied they were seen; and/or (iii) days when the patient could not have been seen by Ganesh or her staff because either the patient or the doctor was not physically present in California. The defendants allegedly also used billing codes that indicated Ganesh and/or Belcher had spent more than 24 hours in a single day seeing patients.  The defendants also maintained multiple bank accounts through which they are alleged to have attempted to conceal the nature and source of the illegally obtained funds which resulted from their scheme to defraud.

Defendants were charged with one count of health care fraud conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349; one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(b); and six counts of money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956(a)(l)(B)(i) and 2. In addition, defendant Ganesh was charged with five counts of health care fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1347 and 2, and five counts of false statements relating to health care matters, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1035. Both defendants were arrested in Saratoga and made their initial appearance in federal court in San Jose. Both defendants were released on bond, pending further hearings. Bail was set at $250,000 per defendant.

If convicted, the defendants face a maximum sentence of 10 years imprisonment and a fine of $250,000, plus restitution for each violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1349 and 1347; and 20 years imprisonment and fine of $500,000 or twice the value of the laundered funds, whichever is greater, plus restitution, for each violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956(h) and 1956(a)(1)(B). However, any sentence following conviction would be imposed by the court after consideration of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and the federal statute governing the imposition of a sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3553.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Amie D. Rooney is prosecuting the case with the assistance of Elise Etter; The prosecution is the result of an investigation by the FBI.

FDA Approves First Opioid Addiction Implant

The FDA approved Probuphine, the first buprenorphine implant for the maintenance treatment of opioid dependence. Probuphine is designed to provide a constant, low-level dose of buprenorphine for six months in patients who are already stable on low-to-moderate doses of other forms of buprenorphine, as part of a complete treatment program.

Prior to this approval, buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid dependence was only approved as a pill or a film placed under the tongue or on the inside of a person’s cheek until it dissolved. While effective, a pill or film may be lost, forgotten or stolen. However, as an implant, Probuphine provides a new treatment option for people in recovery who may value the unique benefits of a six-month implant compared to other forms of buprenorphine, such as the possibility of improved patient convenience from not needing to take medication on a daily basis. An independent FDA advisory committee supported the approval of Probuphine in a meeting held earlier this year.

“Opioid abuse and addiction have taken a devastating toll on American families. We must do everything we can to make new, innovative treatment options available that can help patients regain control over their lives,” said FDA Commissioner Robert M. Califf, M.D. “Today’s approval provides the first-ever implantable option to support patients’ efforts to maintain treatment as part of their overall recovery program.”

Expanding the use and availability of medication-assisted treatment (MAT) options like buprenorphine is an important component of the FDA’s opioid action plan and one of three top priorities for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Opioid Initiative aimed at reducing prescription opioid and heroin related overdose, death and dependence.

Opioid dependence is the diagnostic term used for the more common concept, “addiction,” in the Probuphine clinical trials. Addiction is defined as a cluster of behavioral, cognitive and physiological phenomena that may include a strong desire to take the drug, difficulties in controlling drug use, persisting in drug use despite harmful consequences, a higher priority given to drug use than to other activities and obligations, as well as the possibility of the development of tolerance or development of physical dependence. Physical dependence is not the same as addiction. Newer diagnostic terminology uses the term “opioid use disorder,” which includes both milder forms of problematic opioid use as well as addiction.

MAT is a comprehensive approach that combines approved medications (currently, methadone, buprenorphine or naltrexone) with counseling and other behavioral therapies to treat patients with opioid use disorder. Regular adherence to MAT with buprenorphine reduces opioid withdrawal symptoms and the desire to use, without causing the cycle of highs and lows associated with opioid misuse or abuse. At sufficient doses, it also decreases the pleasurable effects of other opioids, making continued opioid abuse less attractive. According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, patients receiving MAT for their opioid use disorder cut their risk of death from all causes in half.

“Scientific evidence suggests that maintenance treatment with these medications in the context of behavioral treatment and recovery support are more effective in the treatment of opioid use disorder than short-term detoxification programs aimed at abstinence,” said Nora Volkow, M.D., director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse at the National Institutes of Health. “This product will expand the treatment alternatives available to people suffering from an opioid use disorder.”

Ron Mix NFL Capping Case Implicates NBA Player Kermit Washington

A federal grand jury sitting in Kansas City, Missouri, returned an indictment against a former professional basketball player and representative for the National Basketball Players Association (NBPA), charging him with corruptly interfering with the internal revenue laws, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, obstruction of justice and aggravated identity theft.

It is alleged that Washington referred professional athletes to Ron Mix, a former professional football player and an attorney licensed in the state of California, whose practice focused on the filing of workers’ compensation claims on behalf of former professional athletes.  In exchange for the referrals, Mix made payments to PCA and claimed those amounts as charitable deductions on his personal tax returns.  Upon receipt of these payments, Washington diverted the funds for his own personal benefit.

“The federal indictment alleges this former NBA player used his celebrity status to exploit the good intentions of those who donated to a charity he founded, called Project Contact Africa,” said U.S. Attorney Dickinson. According to the indictment, Washington profited by diverting hundreds of thousands of dollars in donations that was supposed to benefit a clinic in Africa for needy families and children, but instead bankrolled his own personal spending.

It is further alleged that Washington conspired with others to defraud eBay and PayPal, customers and donors of PCA by allowing the co-conspirators to use PCA’s name, tax-exempt status and IRS Employee Identification Number (EIN) with eBay and PayPal so the co-conspirators could avoid substantial listing and registration fees incurred in operating online, for-profit businesses.  Moreover, customers who made purchases falsely believed that 100 percent of the proceeds from the co-conspirators’ online eBay sales benefited PCA.  In exchange for allowing the co-conspirators to use PCA’s tax-exempt status, Washington received payments from the co-conspirators.

Washington was arrested in Los Angeles and had his initial appearance in U.S. District Court in the Central District of California. Washington was ordered to surrender his passport and released on bond and must wear a location monitoring device. Washington’s next court date is tentatively scheduled on June 16 before U.S. Magistrate Judge John T. Maughmer in the Western District of Missouri.

If convicted, Washington faces a statutory maximum sentence of three years in prison on the charge of corrupt interference with the internal revenue laws, 20 years in prison on the charge of conspiring to commit wire fraud, 20 years in prison on the charge of obstruction and a mandatory sentence of two years in prison for the charge of aggravated identity theft, which will be in addition to any other term of imprisonment he receives.  He also faces supervised release, a maximum fine of $250,000 on each count and restitution.

Acting Assistant Attorney General Ciraolo and U.S. Attorney Dickinson commended special agents of IRS-Criminal Investigation, Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations, who investigated the case and Assistant U.S.  Attorneys Patrick Daly and Curt Bohling of the Western District of Missouri, and Trial Attorney Ryan Raybould of the Tax Division, who are prosecuting the case.