Menu Close

Second WCAB Appointment Has No WC Experience

Katherine Williams Dodd, 29, of Napa, has just been appointed by Governor Brown to the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.

Dodd has served as deputy legal affairs secretary in the Office of Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. since 2017. She was assistant general manager and corporate secretary at Frog’s Leap Winery from 2016 to 2017.

Dodd was a legislative advocate at the American Civil Liberties Union of California Center for Advocacy and Policy from 2013 to 2016, where she was a legislative assistant from 2010 to 2013.

She earned a Juris Doctor degree from the University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law. She has been admitted to the California State Bar as an attorney since May 27, 2015, slightly more than three years ago.

Dodd is president of the Puertas Abiertas Community Resource Center Board of Directors.

She has no apparent experience in the practice of Workers’ Compensation law, or claims administration. This is the second WCAB appointment by Governor Brown this year of a candidate with virtually no experience in the field.

Earlier this month he appointed Juan Pedro Gaffney, 80, of Sebastopol to the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.

Gaffney has been a member of the California Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board since 2017 and director at Coro Hispano de San Francisco since 1975.

He was director of Hispanic liturgy at Mission Dolores from 1993 to 2008 and was the first artist-in-residence at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts.

Gaffney was an associate professor of philosophy at St. Joseph’s College and a lecturer at Saint Mary’s College from 1972 to 1996.

Gaffney is a vice president of the Instituto Pro Música de California. He has been researching, editing, teaching and performing the choral music of Latin America, Spain and Portugal for the past 35 years.

In 1975 he founded the Coro Hispano de San Francisco and Conjunto Nuevo Mundo, and conjointly, the Instituto Pro Música’s Musicological Research Program, through which he has transcribed and/or edited more than 100 works by New World Renaissance and Baroque masters.

Maestro Gaffney also serves as Director of Hispanic Liturgy at the Basilica of Mission San Francisco de Asís.

He also does not have any background in workers’ compensation.

This position requires Senate confirmation and the compensation is $153,689. Dodd is a Democrat, and is Sen. Bill Dodd’s daughter in law. Gaffney is reportedly Brown’s high school classmate.

Indicted Owner of Sham Clinics Faces Immigration Charges

A Burbank man who operated a string of allegedly sham medical clinics – and who already faces federal charges of using the clinics to orchestrate a massive narcotics scheme – was arrested this week on new charges that he unlawfully procured United States citizenship.

Armen Simonyan, 44, who was free on bond in the narcotics-trafficking case, was arrested after being named in a two-count indictment returned this week by a federal grand jury. The new indictment charges Simonyan with unlawful procurement of United States citizenship and making a false statement on a passport application.

Simonyan was previously indicted in August 2017 on charges that he and other conspirators disseminated more than 2 million pills of controlled prescription drugs to the black market, mostly oxycodone and hydrocodone. Simonyan is currently scheduled to go on trial in that case on February 12, 2019.

The 2017 indictments charge 14 defendants who allegedly participated in an elaborate scheme they mistakenly hoped would conceal a high-volume drug trafficking operation. The alleged leader was Minas Matosyan, an Encino man also known as “Maserati Mike,” who is charged with leading the scheme and controlling six of the sham clinics.

Matosyan allegedly supplied corrupt doctors in exchange for kickbacks derived from proceeds generated when the other sham clinics created fraudulent prescriptions or submitted fraudulent bills to health care programs.

The new indictment outlines Simonyan’s 15-year history of securing United States immigration benefits via fraud and identity theft.

Simonyan allegedly entered the United States from Armenia under a stolen identity and a fraudulent passport. He then sought asylum in the United States, allegedly concocting a false narrative that he was born in Azerbaijan to parents of supposed mixed Armenian-Azerbaijani nationality; that his family suffered ethnic violence, including the murder of both his parents; and that he fled to the United States via Russia.

The new indictment alleges that, in fact, Simonyan was born in Armenia to Armenian parents, that he entered the United States from Armenia, and that both of his parents were alive.

Simonyan will lose his United States citizenship if convicted of the immigration fraud charge.

The indictment also charges Simonyan with lying on his application for a United States passport after he gained citizenship. The alleged false statements related to his place of birth, his date of birth, and his claim that his mother was deceased.

WCAB Adds Instead of Combining PD Ratings

Nohemi Taina suffered a significant injury to her neck and shoulders on 10/4/2011. As a compensable consequence of this injury, she developed psychiatric sequela.

The neck and shoulder injuries were assessed by an AME, David Pang, MD, who rated those disabilities at 48%. There is no dispute at present about the accuracy of this assessment.

The psychiatric consequences were evaluated by AME Joshua Kirz MD, who rated them at 39%, and this assessment is also agreed to have been accurate. Dr. Kirtz reported that applicant’s physical and psychiatric impairments do not overlap and that her “physical and psychiatric impairments appear additive” in their effect on permanent disability.

The sole disagreement was whether the overall level of permanent disability was best represented by combining the two values using the Combined Values Chart, which would produce 68% PD, or adding the two, which would produce 87% PD.

The WCJ found that adding the two disabilities was appropriate and awarded 87% Permanent Disability. The Defendant Petitioned for Reconsideration, which was denied in the panel decision of Taina v County of Santa Clara.

“To assure accuracy in the calculation of WPI, a physician may, with proper explanation, deviate from the percentages contained in the applicable chapter of the AMA Guides in order to better express the injured worker’s level of WPI in light of the physician’s skill, knowledge, and experience, as well as considerations unique to the injury and information derived from extrinsic resources. (Almaraz v.Environmental Recovery Service/Guzman v. Milpitas Unified School District (2009) 74 Cal.Comp.Cases 1084 (Appeals Board en banc).”

“Similarly, in finding permanent disability the WCAB applies its expertise to determine an accurate rating based upon the entirety of the record.”

In determining overall permanent disability, it has been recognized that the rating schedules provide only a “guide,” and that the final rating should reflect “the entire picture of disability and possibility of employability.”

“The disability values of multiple impairments may be added instead of combined using the CVC if that provides an accurate rating, particularly when there is no overlap, and when the synergistic effect of the multiple disabilities support that method of combination.”

The WCJ’ s decision to add the permanent disability values of applicant’s orthopedic and psychiatric conditions is based upon the reporting of the AMEs and is supported by the AMA Guides, as shown by the discussion of the role of the trier of fact that is provided in Chapters 14 and 1.5 on pages 9 and I0 of the AMA Guides, as follows:

“A scientific formula has not been established t o indicate the best way to combine multiple impairments. Given the diversity of impairments and great variability in herein in combining multiple impairments, it is difficult to establish a formula that accounts for all situations. A combination of some impairments could decrease overall functioning more than suggested by just adding the impairment ratings for the separate impairments (eg blindness and inability to use both hands). When other multiple impairments are combined, a less than additive approach may be more appropriate . . .”

FDA Rejects Another New Opioid

Remoxy ER (oxycodone) Extended-Release Capsules CII, based on Pain Therapeutics’ ORADUR technology, is a long-acting formulation of oxycodone designed to discourage most methods of tampering linked to opioid abuse.

However, a joint meeting of the Anesthetic and Analgesic Drug Products Advisory Committee and Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee to the FDA voted 14 to 3 against approving the drug. And the FDA agreed and argued that the benefits of the drug did not outweigh the risks.

The company reacted badly.

“This is a bizarre conclusion to reach, especially during a time of staggering human and economic toll created by opioid abuse and addiction,” said Remi Barbier, Pain Therapeutics’ president and chief executive officer, in a statement. “We have an innovative drug with a social purpose, and a staggering amount of data that easily supports best-in-class abuse deterrence versus OxyContin. We relied on the criteria of a fair, neutral and impartial regulatory review, as any sponsor would. Instead, I believe Remoxy received an ideological judgment call that is vague in nature but conclusive in its damaging effects.”

This is the companies fourth rejection on Remoxy. Seemingly in response to the rejection, Pain Therapeutics has launched a strategic reorganization. It plans to shift its focus from tamper-resistant opioid formulations to Alzheimer’s disease. Details are expected to be released in the upcoming weeks.

The FDA has perhaps changed direction on approval of opioid pain management strategies. They have announced “we must also take steps to help those with acute and chronic pain who need access to medicines, including opioids, get improved treatment alternatives.”

“Transitioning from the current market, dominated by conventional opioids, to one in which most opioids have abuse-deterrent properties, holds significant promise for a meaningful public health benefit. While these innovative formulations are designed to make it harder for people to manipulate the opioid drug so they can’t be abused, it’s important that prescribers and patients understand that these drugs are not ‘abuse-proof,’ and they do not prevent addiction, overdose, or death.”

“In addition, part of our ongoing work is ensuring that drug approval and removal decisions are made within a benefit/risk framework that evaluates not only the outcomes of opioids when used a prescribed, but also the public health effects of inappropriate use of these drugs. We are continually re-evaluating the safety of approved opioid products based on both post-market data the FDA has required from sponsors and additional sources of information as part of our safety surveillance.”

Both the announced policy and the FDA current opioid rejection history seem to indicate a trend away from opioid drugs toward “alternatives,” whatever that might be.

August 6, 2018 Edition


Rene Thomas Folse, JD, Ph.D. is the host for this edition which reports on the following news stories: Parties Have no Unconditional Right to PQME, Safety Consultant Owes Duty of Care to Injured Workers, Jury Convicts San Leandro Physician’s Assistant, Nail Salon Cited for $1.2M Wage Theft, DWC Administrative Director Announces His Future Plans, DWC Corrects OMFS to Delete Zero Value MUE, Opioid Use Remains Tenaciously High in the U.S., FDA Rejects Opioid Drug From Controversial Company, Comp Industry Shows Strong Underwriting Performance, New WC Carrier Opens in San Diego.

14 California Hospitals Settle Fraud Claims for $65M

Prime Healthcare Services, Inc.; Prime Healthcare Foundation, Inc.; Prime Healthcare Management, Inc.; and Prime’s Founder and chief executive officer, Dr. Prem Reddy, have agreed to pay the United States $65 million to settle allegations that 14 Prime hospitals in California knowingly submitted false claims to Medicare by admitting patients who required only less costly, outpatient care and by billing for more expensive patient diagnoses than the patients had (a practice known as “up-coding”).

Under the settlement agreement, Reddy will pay $3.25 million and Prime will pay $61.75 million.

Headquartered in Ontario, California, Prime Healthcare Services and the not-for-profit Prime Healthcare Foundation constitute one of the largest hospital systems in the nation, with 45 acute-care hospitals located in 14 states.

The following 10 hospital defendants owned by Prime Healthcare Services are parties to the settlement agreement: Alvarado Hospital Medical Center, Garden Grove Medical Center, La Palma Intercommunity Hospital, Desert Valley Hospital, Chino Valley Medical Center, Paradise Valley Hospital, San Dimas Community Hospital, Shasta Regional Medical Center, West Anaheim Medical Center and Centinela Hospital Medical Center.

Four other hospital defendants owned by Prime Healthcare Foundation are also parties to the settlement agreement: Sherman Oaks Hospital, Montclair Hospital Medical Center, Huntington Beach Hospital and Encino Hospital Medical Center. Prime Healthcare Management, a subsidiary of Prime Healthcare Services, provides management, consulting and support services to hospitals owned and operated by Prime.

The settlement resolves allegations that, from 2006 through 2013, Prime engaged in a deliberate, corporate-driven scheme to increase inpatient admissions of Medicare beneficiaries who originally presented to the Emergency Departments at the 14 Prime hospitals in California.

The government claimed that the inpatient admission of these beneficiaries was not medically necessary because their symptoms and treatment needs should have been managed in a less-costly outpatient or observation setting. Hospitals generally receive significantly higher payments from Medicare for inpatient admissions as opposed to outpatient treatment; therefore, the admission of beneficiaries who do not need inpatient care, as alleged here, can result in substantial financial harm to the Medicare program.

The settlement also resolves allegations that, from 2006 through 2014, Prime engaged in up-coding by falsifying information concerning patient diagnoses, including complications and comorbidities, in order to increase Medicare reimbursement.

This settlement resolves a False Claims Act (FCA) lawsuit filed in federal court in Los Angeles by Karin Berntsen, the former director of performance improvement at Alvarado Hospital Medical Center in San Diego. Under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the FCA, private citizens are permitted to bring lawsuits on behalf of the United States and obtain a portion of the government’s recovery. The FCA also permits the government to intervene and take over the lawsuit, as it did in this case as to some of Ms. Berntsen’s allegations. Ms. Berntsen will receive $17,225,000 as her portion of the settlement amount.

The case is United States ex rel. Karin Berntsen v. Prime Healthcare Services, Inc., et al., CV11-08214-PJW (C.D. Cal.). The claims resolved by this settlement are allegations only and there has been no determination of liability.

Unlicensed Tree Trimmer v. Homeowner Suit Affirmed

Despite the prevalence of “do-it-yourself” manuals and television shows, most homeowners eventually decide that some home repairs or maintenance would best be done by hiring someone to do the work. Inevitably, some workers are injured. There are sometimes confusing rules about when a homeowner is liable for injuries to workers on the property, either in tort or under the workers’ compensation system.

The common questions include whether the person hired by the homeowner was (1) required to be a licensed professional to do the work, and (2) if so, whether the person had the required license. The Court of Appeal in the published case of Jones v Sorenson was required to sort through these questions.

Homeowner Danita Sorenson hired “Odette Miranda dba Designs by Leo” to trim and cut trees on Sorenson’s property, and Miranda hired Jones to help her. Miranda had done landscaping work for Sorenson for 13 or 14 years, including weeding, trimming, maintaining a front-yard pond, and so forth. Miranda did not routinely use a ladder. Miranda was not licensed or insured.

Jones worked as a helper for Miranda about twice a year, and Miranda paid Jones. Jones had worked at Sorenson’s property four times, and once she had trimmed trees from the ground. This time Jones used a small ladder and a larger pole ladder to prune lilacs and remove plums from a tree. While trimming and cutting a tree over 15 feet tall, and while using a ladder provided by Miranda, Jones fell and was hurt.

Jones’s claim for workers compensation benefits was denied by Sorenson’s homeowner’s insurance carrier because Jones had not satisfied statutory minimum work requirements under the Labor Code.

Miranda was allegedly negligent in various ways (failure to train, supervise, provide proper equipment, etc.), but because Miranda was an unlicensed contractor, Sorenson was deemed by law to be Miranda’s employer. Therefore, Sorenson was liable for Miranda’s negligence on a respondeat superior theory, i.e., Miranda’s negligence was imputable to defendant.

The trial court ruled in effect that the terms “gardener” and “nurseryperson” as used in Business and Professions Code section 7026.1 were synonymous, and therefore Sorenson could avoid tort liability because a person acting as a nurseryperson may trim trees 15 feet tall or higher without a contractor’s license, although a gardener cannot. Summary judgment was granted dismissing the case. Jones appealed, and the Court of Appeal reversed in the published case.

As stated by our Supreme Court, “It is doubtful the average homeowner realizes tree trimming can require a contractor’s license.” (Fernandez v. Lawson (2003) 31 Cal.4th 31, 37.

The relevant statute, which distinguishes between a “gardener” and a “nurseryperson”; the latter refers to a licensed operator of a nursery, whereas a gardener does not require a license. There is no evidence that the gardener Sorenson hired was also a nurseryperson. This means Sorenson–the movant on summary judgment–has not refuted the claim that she was the gardener’s (and therefore Jones’s) employer, and potentially liable under a respondeat superior theory for the gardener’s alleged negligence.

Comp Industry Shows Strong Underwriting Performance

Fitch Ratings reports that the U.S. workers’ compensation insurance market reported strong underwriting performance for the third consecutive year in 2017, with an industry statutory combined ratio of approximately 92 percent..

However, a steady decline in premium rates from increased competition will ultimately lead to weaker underwriting results.

According to the summary prepared by the Insurance Journal, Fitch believes that while the industry may still generate underwriting profits this year, workers’ compensation results will move toward break-even in 2019, with low visibility of longer term projected results due to historical performance volatility.

Positive performance drivers include underwriting exposure growth, continued falling claims frequency rates and conservative reserve levels.

Past underwriting and pricing actions and relatively stable loss trends have positively influenced recent market performance. Recognition of greater reserve redundancies in 2017 also partly drove results, which totaled ~12 percent of market earned premiums. Fitch says favorable loss reserve redundancies will materialize for the next few years but to a lessening degree than in 2017.

Factors that can negatively affect future industry performance include premium rate pressure, increasing medical loss severity and erosion of past reform benefits in key states.

Market direct written premium volume in 2017 declined by 30 bps from the prior year to $56 billion, representing the first year of lower market premiums since 2010.

Net written premiums fell by 1.3 percent during the same time, mainly due to larger reinsurance cessions. Premium revenue weakness, along with greater technology-related spending, has led to higher expense ratios, which have risen two points since 2014 for the industry.

Workers’ compensation premium growth will continue to lag other commercial lines segments due largely to divergent pricing trends. According to the Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers’ quarterly Commercial Property/Casualty Market Index Survey, renewal rates in the workers’ compensation segment declined in each of the past 13 consecutive quarters.

Shifts in loss cost trends, particularly claims severity, represent a source for future workers’ compensation performance deterioration that bears further monitoring. Both indemnity and medical claims cost severity were relatively stable compared with historical norms for nearly a decade but ticked up recently.

The National Council on Compensation Insurance’s latest State of the Line presentation notes an increase in workers’ compensation indemnity and medical cost claims severity of 4 percent each in 2017.

New WC Carrier Opens in San Diego

Accredited Surety & Casualty Company, Inc., a Florida-headquartered insurance company that is licensed in all 50 states to write admitted business, has closed its largest ever program underwriting partnership. Atlas General Insurance Services, LLC, a national multi-line program administrator, has added an exclusive new workers’ compensation insurance program with Accredited.

Accredited recently expanded its insurance offerings to include workers’ compensation and selected Atlas as its exclusive program administrator nationwide. California is the first state where the program is available, and Atlas is actively working with Accredited to expand this program nationwide.

The new platform includes more than 320 eligible class codes, including contractors, healthcare, transportation, agriculture, towing, janitorial, manufacturing, refuse operations, warehousing & storage, automotive services and more. Atlas also includes services like an online rater, flexible payment plans, loss control services and claims handling.

Atlas is now accepting applications for these risks.

Atlas General Insurance Services provides service and coverage for clients seeking workers’ compensation, commercial lines, and specialty property coverage. It also develops and underwrites various insurance solutions in the United States. It provides workers’ compensation insurance solutions for agriculture, construction, healthcare, janitorial services, landscaping, manufacturing, recycling operations, transportation, and warehousing and storage industries.

The company also underwrites commercial insurance for small and medium-sized businesses in the United States. It focuses on general liability, property, package, inland marine, and other property and casualty lines; and commercial property and Difference in Conditions (DIC), including earthquake and incidental flood coverage.

The company was incorporated in 2008 and is based in San Diego, California. It has locations in Knoxville, Tennessee and New York, New York.

Accredited Surety and Casualty Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Randall & Quilter Investment Holdings, Ltd. Accredited is a Florida domiciled insurer that is U.S. Treasury listed and licensed and admitted in all 50 states as well as the District of Columbia with offices in Orlando and Atlanta.

Randall & Quilter Investment Holdings Ltd. is a diverse insurance group, headquartered and operating in Bermuda but with extensive operations in the UK, US, Bermuda and Europe.

Opioid Use Remains Tenaciously High in U.S.

The August online issue of the British Medical Journal reports that the use of prescription opioids remains high in the U.S., despite public health efforts and growing awareness of risks for abuse and overdose.

Over a decade, the proportion of adults being prescribed opioid medications has changed little, but dosages have continued to rise and are especially high among patients with permanent disability, researchers report in The BMJ.

Reuters Health reports that it was surprising to study leader Molly Moore Jeffery of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. “You expect to see them using more, but it was bigger than I expected,” she said.

Also concerning were the number of patients with prescriptions for both opioids and benzodiazepines, because the combination can raise the risk of death, Jeffery said.

The U.S. has the highest per capita rate of opioid use in the world – nearly double that of second-ranked Germany and seven times higher than the UK, the researchers note. On average, 40 people die in the U.S. daily from prescription opioid overdoses, a four-fold increase since 1999, they add.

Jeffery’s team analyzed a national database of medical and pharmacy claims to examine trends in opioid use among 48 million people with health insurance between 2007 and 2016. They included working-age adults with commercial insurance, as well as Medicare beneficiaries eligible for coverage either because they were over age 65 or younger but disabled.

Overall, 14 percent of commercially insured patients and 26 percent of older Medicare beneficiaries used opioids during the study period. The rate was 52 percent among disabled Medicare beneficiaries.

To allow comparisons between different opioid medications, the researchers converted all prescription doses into so-called milligram morphine equivalents (MME).

Like other recent studies, this one showed that opioid use and average dose leveled off after peaking in 2012-2013. But the MME dose in all groups of patients was still higher in 2016 than it was in 2007.

“All reports are showing that opioid prescribing still occurs too frequently and (is) far higher than in the 1990s in the U.S.,” said Dr. John Mafi of the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, who wasn’t involved in the study.

“This is a cause for alarm and we need rapid and effective policy changes to decrease overprescribing and reduce opioid-related deaths. Specifically, we need to improve access and coverage of evidence-based non-opioid pain alternatives, such as topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications for acute musculoskeletal pain or physical therapy for chronic low back pain.”