Menu Close

AM Best Reports WC Highly Profitable Compared With P/C Lines

AM Best is a global credit rating agency, news publisher and data analytics provider specializing in the insurance industry. According to a new AM Best report underwriters of workers’ compensation insurance have consistently generated better underwriting profits than other property/casualty (P/C) lines of business, again doing so in 2020 amid the pandemic.  

The Best’s Market Segment Report, titled, “Workers’ Compensation Still Outpacing Other Lines” states that underwriting results of workers’ compensation insurers remained strong in 2020, despite a 10% decline in bottom-line net premiums written, owing to the substantial drop in payrolls during the second quarter of the year.

The combined ratio of 91.1 in the workers’ compensation segment in 2020 was a few points higher than in 2019, but still comfortably under the breakeven mark of 100.0, reflecting profitable underwriting. Given the decline in premium, expense ratios rose, but the increase was nominal and did not overly dampen underwriting earnings.

Premium volume for workers’ compensation writers also has been constrained by rate decreases in most states. According to the report, some writers are looking to develop new products and explore new markets in other lines of coverage and allowing their workers’ compensation top-line premium to decline in the states where they generate significant premium.

Despite the smaller premium base, workers’ compensation insurers remained highly profitable in comparison with other P/C lines. Workers’ compensation underwriters have benefited from a decline in lost-time claims frequency tied to efforts to improve workplace safety. Other factors that have benefited the line’s profitability are the declines in fraud, workplace accidents and defense costs.

AM Best also analyzes the overall health of the workers’ compensation line of business through its Workers’ Compensation Composite, which is composed of U.S. companies, including state funds, whose workers’ compensation and excess workers’ compensation net premiums constitute 50% or more of their total net premiums. Even with the 2020 decline in workers’ compensation premium due to the pandemic, the market share of these specialists rose to 26.2% in 2020, up considerably from 16.7% in 2011.

AM Best’s negative market segment outlook for the workers’ compensation segment, the largest component of the U.S. commercial lines market, reflects the continued uncertainty about the effects of COVID-19, from an economic and a regulatory perspective, as well as a legislative one as states consider presumptive legislation stemming from the pandemic. Moreover, although the impact of the pandemic on insurers’ balance sheets to date has been tempered, concerns about the prolonged low interest rate environment persist. As a result, investment returns are expected to remain flat, and insurers may begin seeking riskier investments to generate higher yield.

Employer’s Constitutional Challenge to Safety Citation Rejected

Lion Farms, LLC owned and operated a dried-on-the-vine raisin vineyard in Madera County (Cottonwood Ranch), at which Lion’s employee Isaac Rey Barrientos worked.

On June 10, 2015, Barrientos was killed when he lost control of the Lion-owned ATV he was riding in the vineyard to service Lion’s portable toilets, and the ATV’s right front tire hit an eye ring grape stake, ejecting Barrientos off of the vehicle.

The June 12, 2015, Merced County Sheriff’s Office Report of Autopsy and the Madera County Certificate of Vital Record listed “blunt impact thoracospinal injuries” (not a head injury) as Barrientos’s cause of death. He was not wearing a helmet at the time of his fatal accident.

While Barrientos’s death was not due to the absence of head protection, Division Associate Safety Engineer Randy Chase found that wearing helmets while riding ATV’s would reduce the inherent risk of head injury. However, Chase also found that Lion had no written certification of having conducted a workplace hazard assessment and no requirement that its employees wear helmets as PPE while riding ATV’s.

Lion was therefore cited for violations of workplace safety regulations by the Division of Occupational Safety and Health.

Lion challenged the citations and the penalties by filing an appeal with the Board. Lion engaged the services of a retained industrial safety expert, who opined in his prepared report that a helmet would represent a hazard in itself and should never be worn while riding an ATV in and under the raisin vine “canopy” of hanging fruit and canes, as a helmet would “most probably become tangled within the vines and pull the rider off the vehicle, causing severe injury or death.”

Following the hearings, the ALJ upheld the citations, and reconsideration was denied. Lion filed its petition for writ of administrative mandate with the trial court, which was denied after a hearing on the merits. The Court of Appeal affirmed the citations in the unpublished case of Lion Farms v. Cal Occupational Safety and Health etc.

Among other issues, Lion claimed that section 3380 (particularly with respect to PPE required in the context of ATV usage in agricultural settings), as applied on the facts and circumstances of this case violated Lion’s substantive due process protections because the regulations were unconstitutionally vague and ambiguous. The Court of Appeal rejected this argument.

An administrative regulation violates due process of law if it forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that persons of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application. In considering a vagueness challenge to an administrative regulation, courts do not view the regulation in the abstract; rather they consider whether it is vague when applied to the complaining party’s conduct in light of the specific facts of the particular case. Standards under a regulation may be refined and developed on a case-by-case basis.

Section 3380(f)(1)(A)’s requirement that employers assess their workplaces to determine if hazards necessitating the use of PPE are present or likely to be present (and if such a determination is affirmatively made, select and make available the types of PPE that will protect affected employees from the hazards identified in the workplace assessment) is not impermissibly vague.

Corona Pharmacist Sentenced for $13M Compound Med Fraud

An Orange County pharmacist has been sentenced to 70 months in federal prison for submitting more than $13 million in claims for medically unnecessary compounded medication prescriptions.

42 year old Thu Van Le, a.k.a. “Tony Le,” who lives in Placentia, was sentenced by United States District Judge R. Gary Klausner.

In addition to the prison term, Judge Klausner ordered Le to pay $10,982,759 in restitution to Tricare, the U.S. military’s managed health care plan, and $768,488 in restitution to Amplan, Amtrak’s employee health care benefit plan.

Le, a pharmacist who owned TC Medical Pharmacy located at 760 S. Washburn Ave. #1 in Corona California, pleaded guilty on July 12 to one count of health care fraud.

From March 2015 to December 2016, Le’s pharmacy submitted more than $13 million in total claims to Tricare and AmPlan, against which Tricare paid $10,982,759 and AmPlan paid $768,488. Le, in turn, paid so-called “marketers” handsome kickbacks of up to 50 percent of the Tricare reimbursements.

The marketers used personal and insurance information to generate fraudulent prescriptions for compounded medications, according to court documents. Marketers who participated in the scheme solicited beneficiaries of the health plans through misleading cold calls that promised free compounded medications. In some cases, beneficiaries were not contacted at all and simply received expensive medications that they did not order.

Compounded drugs are tailor-made products doctors may prescribe when the Food and Drug Administration-approved alternative does not meet the health needs of a patient.

Le agreed to be bound by Tricare and AmPlan rules for reimbursement of claims for their beneficiaries. Tricare and AmPlan required that medications be medically necessary, that beneficiaries be examined by physicians, and that Le’s pharmacy collect co-payments. The prescriptions were supposed to be for unique patient needs, but they instead were formulated to maximize reimbursements and were prepared on an assembly-line basis.

The Defense Criminal Investigative Service, the FBI, IRS Criminal Investigation, Amtrak’s Office of Inspector General, the Office of Personnel Management’s Office of Inspector General, the United States Department of Labor – Employee Benefits Security Administration, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the California Department of Insurance investigated this matter.

Assistant United States Attorney Mark Aveis of the Major Frauds Section prosecuted this case.

Pfizer Vaccine Protection Declines to 47% by 5 Months

The Los Angeles Times reports that research conducted in Southern California has confirmed the dramatic erosion of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine’s protection against “breakthrough” coronavirus infections.

The new study, one of the largest and longest to track the effectiveness of a vaccine in Americans, found that the vaccine’s ability to protect against infection stood at 88% in its first month, then fell to 47% after just five months.

But even as the Delta variant became the predominant strain across the Southland, the vaccine’s effectiveness at preventing COVID-19 hospitalizations held steady at close to 90% for as long as six months. What’s more, it maintained that power across vaccine recipients of all age groups.

The study, funded by Pfizer and published Monday in the journal Lancet, also provides strong new evidence that the waning immunity against infection probably would have been seen with or without the arrival of the Delta variant.

Researchers found that a fresh inoculation with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine protected just as well against an infection with the Delta variant as it did against infection with other versions of the coronavirus.

Second, the vaccine’s ability to keep vaccinated people out of the hospital remained high across a span of time when the Delta variant gained ground in Southern California.

And third, breakthrough infections were more closely linked to the amount of time that had lapsed since vaccination than they were to the particular viral variant involved.

By showing that waning immunity, not the Delta variant, was the likely reason for the rise in breakthrough infections, the study suggests it may not be necessary to reformulate a Pfizer-BioNTech booster that specifically targets Delta. For now, at least, a third shot identical to the first two would probably extend the vaccine’s early record of protection against all strains, including Delta.

The protection provided by the Pfizer vaccine beyond six months has been an open question, hinted at only by Israeli studies that suggest COVID-19 hospitalization rates rise in those above 60 years of age.

In another recent study, researchers from Emory University and Stanford found that six months after being inoculated with the Pfizer vaccine, roughly half of 56 young and middle-aged adults had no detectable neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The reduced immunity was particularly dramatic against the coronavirus variants Delta, Beta and Mu.

That study was posted last week on BioRXiv, a site where researchers share preliminary work before it has been peer-reviewed. But its findings of “a substantial waning of antibody responses” – as well as a drop in the immunity provided by T cells – suggest that a third booster immunization “might be warranted,” its authors wrote.

October 4, 2021 – News Podcast


Rene Thomas Folse, JD, Ph.D. is the host for this edition which reports on the following news stories: Plaintiff Attorneys in Subrogation Action Can Settle and Switch Sides. Major SoCal Gaming Company Resolves EEOC Claims for $18M. Bizarre Premium Fraud Conviction Appeal Continues for 18 Years. Car Wash Owners Face Premium Fraud Charges. SoCal Woman Sentenced for Multi-Million Dollar Medical Fraud. Gov Newsom Vetoes Limitations on Apportionment. Newsom Signs Law Extending CIGA Authority to Borrow $1.5 Billion. CWCI Finds IMR Volume Continued to Decline in 2021. WCIRB Reports Lowest Written Premium Since 2012. California Business Exits to Other States Doubled in 2021.

Work Comp Costs for Workplace Diseases Face Projected Increases

Increased global risk for infectious disease epidemics, coupled with state-level legislative trends expanding presumptions for communicable disease, mean that the burden of related costs may fall more heavily on employers and the workers’ compensation system.

According to the report in RxInformer, the COVID-19 pandemic forced employers to examine the impact and mitigation of infectious disease risk in the workplace as never before. It changed the way in which many of us work at least temporarily; for others, more permanently as some organizations make the decision to adopt long-term strategies for their workforce based on lessons learned from the pandemic.

And in some cases, as exampled by the unprecedented federal mandate beholding businesses to rigorous vaccination and testing requirements for their employees, it is forcing employers to take on an increasingly larger role in solutioning what has traditionally been a public health issue.

The World Health Organization (WHO) states that “epidemics of infectious disease are occurring more often, and spreading faster and further than ever, in many different regions of the world.” The global organization attributes this to a combination of environmental, biological and lifestyle factors that include increased cross-border travel, urbanization, population displacement due to humanitarian emergencies, conflicts and natural disasters, and unhealthy agricultural and food production practices, just to name a few.

While traumatic injuries such as sprains, strains and tears top the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ list of occupational injury types, illness directly related to exposure at work comprises approximately five percent of total occupational injury and illness incidence. It has been estimated in a separate analysis that on-the-job illness totals nearly $60 billion a year for both medical and indirect (productivity) costs.

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the definitions for occupational illness were typically quite narrow and predominantly applied to specific industries in which the risk of exposure at work significantly outweighs the risk of exposure in one’s daily life.

But the legislative trends arising from COVID-19 have expanded how states are beginning to look at communicable diseases in the workplace – and where the responsibility for related medical costs resides. While the language and approach vary from state-to-state, 2021 saw a wave of proposals that would put permanent legislation into place allowing injured workers who contract a communicable disease in the workplace to file a workers’ compensation claim.

Presumptions aside, communicable diseases – even those that are not deemed occupational – cost employers significantly in terms of employee lost time and productivity. Take the common flu virus. Pre-pandemic, the 2018-2019 productivity loss estimate due to influenza was $17.6B, based on a 4-day work loss assumption per sick employee.

USCF and Scripps Research Neuroscientists Awarded Nobel Prize

Our ability to sense heat, cold and touch is essential for survival and underpins our interaction with the world around us. In our daily lives we take these sensations for granted, but how are nerve impulses initiated so that temperature and pressure can be perceived? This question has been solved by this year’s Nobel Prize laureates.

The laureates identified critical missing links in our understanding of the complex interplay between our senses and the environment.

University of California, San Francisco David Julius utilized capsaicin, a pungent compound from chili peppers that induces a burning sensation, to identify a sensor in the nerve endings of the skin that responds to heat. Scripps Research in La Jolla, California scientist Ardem Patapoutian used pressure-sensitive cells to discover a novel class of sensors that respond to mechanical stimuli in the skin and internal organs. These breakthrough discoveries launched intense research activities leading to a rapid increase in our understanding of how our nervous system senses heat, cold, and mechanical stimuli.

Prior to the discoveries of David Julius and Ardem Patapoutian, the understanding of how the nervous system senses and interprets our environment still contained a fundamental unsolved question: how are temperature and mechanical stimuli converted into electrical impulses in the nervous system?

In the latter part of the 1990’s, David Julius saw the possibility for major advances by analyzing how the chemical compound capsaicin causes the burning sensation we feel when we come into contact with chili peppers. Capsaicin was already known to activate nerve cells causing pain sensations, but how this chemical actually exerted this function was an unsolved riddle.

After a laborious search, a single gene was identified that was able to make cells capsaicin sensitive. The gene for capsaicin sensing had been found! Further experiments revealed that the identified gene encoded a novel ion channel protein and this newly discovered capsaicin receptor was later named TRPV1. When Julius investigated the protein’s ability to respond to heat, he realized that he had discovered a heat-sensing receptor that is activated at temperatures perceived as painful.

While the mechanisms for temperature sensation were unfolding, it remained unclear how mechanical stimuli could be converted into our senses of touch and pressure. Researchers had previously found mechanical sensors in bacteria, but the mechanisms underlying touch in vertebrates remained unknown. Ardem Patapoutian, wished to identify the elusive receptors that are activated by mechanical stimuli.

The breakthrough by Patapoutian led to a series of papers from his and other groups, demonstrating that the Piezo2 ion channel is essential for the sense of touch. Moreover, Piezo2 was shown to play a key role in the critically important sensing of body position and motion, known as proprioception. In further work, Piezo1 and Piezo2 channels have been shown to regulate additional important physiological processes including blood pressure, respiration and urinary bladder control.

September 27, 2021 – News Podcast


Rene Thomas Folse, JD, Ph.D. is the host for this edition which reports on the following news stories: Modified Work Not Required After Discovery of Undocumented Status. Drugmakers Pay $453M to Resolve Pay-For-Delay Price Fixing. Understaffed Psychiatric Hospital Resolves Suit for $2.85M. 138 Defendants Charged in 1.4 Billion Healthcare Fraud Busts. Contractors Charged with $5 Million Premium Fraud Scheme. Global Fraud Prevention Market Growing 25% Annually. DWC Withdraws Setting of TTD Rates for 2022. WCRI Study Claims Early Manual Therapy Lowers Med Costs. Comp Drug Costs Decreased by 38% in Ten Years. NCCI Analysis Shows WC Costs More than Group Health.

Newsom Signs Law Extending CIGA Authority to Borrow $1.5B

The California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) was created by legislation in 1969 as an association of insurers that makes payments to policyholders of property/casualty, workers’ compensation and “miscellaneous” insurers when the member insurance company becomes insolvent and is unable to do so. It is a statutory entity that depends on the establishing legislation for its existence and for a definition of the scope of its powers, duties and protections.

CIGA is funded by premium surcharges upon applicable lines of insurance, and those surcharges are limited by statute to a maximum of 2%.

The purpose of CIGA is to pay “covered claims” of member insurance companies that have become insolvent. CIGA’s total liability for any single claim is $500,000, other than claims for workers’ compensation, which are not limited. CIGA does not have to pay a claim to the extent that it is covered by any other insurance of a class covered by this law and available to the claimant or insured (Insurance Code §1063.1(c)(9)(A)).

There are several catastrophic risks that contribute CIGA’s need to be able to access large amounts of cash including pandemic risks, the risk of a devastating earthquake occurring during work time in a major city, and potential losses due to wildfires and other natural disasters.

In 2003, Assembly Bill 227 (Vargas) provided express authority for CIGA to issue up to $1.5 billion in bonds to fund workers’ compensation claims payments for injured workers of insolvent insurers. At the time and beginning in the late 1990s, CIGA had assumed responsibility for paying covered claims of 27 insolvent workers’ compensation insurance companies. The Legislature placed a sunset provision on the original bonding authority and has extended the date on four separate occasions.

The California legislature has passed, and Governor Newsom has just signed AB 1541 a fifth extension of this bonding authority. The last date upon which CIGA is authorized to issue bonds would change from January 1, 2023 to January 1, 2026.

Specifically, this new law extends the existing ability of CIGA to request the issuance of bonds by the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank to more expeditiously and effectively provide for the payment of covered claims arising from insolvencies of insurance companies providing workers’ compensation insurance.

SoCal Woman Sentenced for Multi-Million Dollar Medical Fraud

A California woman was sentenced for her role in a multi-million-dollar Medicare fraud scheme.

Stefanie Hirsch, 51, of Los Angeles, Calif., was sentenced by U.S. Senior District Court Judge George A. O’Toole Jr. to three years of probation. Hirsch was also ordered to pay a fine of $2,500. On Feb. 24, 2021, Hirsch pleaded guilty to violating the HIPAA statute.

Hirsch sold access to a Medicare eligibility tool that allowed Juan C. Perez Buitrago and Nathan LaParl to improperly access patients’ detailed personal, demographic, medical and insurance information.

Hirsch owned EI Medical, Inc., a Medicare-enrolled wheelchair and scooter repair company that qualified for access to a health care clearinghouse that contains Medicare patients’ personal, medical and insurance information.

Hirsch improperly gave Perez Buitrago and LaParl access to that clearinghouse and charged them about $0.25 per patient eligibility check. Using Hirsch’s credentials,

LaParl accessed the personal and medical data of more than 350,000 patients and Perez Buitrago’s credentials were used for 150,000 patients.

Perez Buitrago and LaParl pleaded guilty to federal health care crimes in October 2020 and January 2021, respectively.

Acting United States Attorney Nathaniel R. Mendell; Johnnie Sharp Jr., Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Birmingham Field Division; Phillip Coyne, Special Agent in Charge of the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General, Boston Division; and Joshua McCallister, Acting Inspector in Charge of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service made the announcement. Assistant U.S. Attorney Elysa Q. Wan of Mendell’s Health Care Fraud Unit prosecuted the case.