While confined in state prison, Gray Bond Gracy punched nurse Andrew Jones in the face multiple times.juries prevented him from returning to work. Jones’s injuries included a left eye contusion, blurry vision, nausea, lumbar strain, post-traumatic anxiety, an adjustment disorder, and situational stress. The Victims Compensation and Government Claims Board (Gov. Code, § 13950 et seq.) awarded Jones $28,787.90 for lost overtime pay, which was not covered by workers compensation insurance.
Gracy pleaded no contest to an assault on Andrew Jones by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury. (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(4).) He entered his plea pursuant to an agreement which provided he would receive a low-term, two-year sentence and be required to pay restitution to the Victims Compensation and Government Claims Board. Thus, the court ordered him to pay restitution of $28,787.90 for lost overtime wages. Gracy appealed the restitution order and the Court of Appeal affirmed in the unpublished case of People v Gracy.
Gracy contended on appeal that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering him to pay the victim $28,787.90 as restitution. His contention was erroneously based on the purported duty of the prosecution to authenticate by live testimony the underpinnings of the claim.
During the restitution proceeding, the prosecutor provided the court with a copy of an employment verification form which showed that (1) Jones had worked for his employer from September 23, 1996, through April 18, 2013; and (2) before April 18, Jones had worked an average of 31.19 overtime hours per month, at a rate of $61.17 per hour (approximately $1,907 of overtime wages per month). The employer did not complete the blank space in the verification form section which reads as follows: “Employee would have worked an avg. of __ weekly overtime hours if the incident had not occurred.” The Board paid Jones $28,787.90 of overtime wages, for a period of approximately 15 months based upon his average monthly overtime wages prior to the incident. Gracy offered no evidence.
While the prosecution does bear the burden of proof to establish the loss and its relationship to the crime, this burden is met by submission of Board’s findings and orders. “If, as a result of the defendant’s conduct, the Restitution Fund has provided assistance to or on behalf of victim,” pursuant to section 13950 of the Government Code, “the amount of assistance provided shall be presumed to be a direct result of the defendant’s criminal conduct and shall be included in the amount of the restitution ordered.”
The standard of proof at a restitution hearing is by a preponderance of the evidence, not proof beyond a reasonable doubt. When there is a factual and rational basis for the amount of restitution ordered by the trial court, no abuse of discretion will be found by the reviewing court.
Here the prosecution made a prima facie showing of Jones’s loss by presenting documentary evidence that before the assault he worked an average of 31.19 hours in overtime each month, payable at the hourly rate of $61.17. It was reasonable to assume that Jones would have continued to work an average of 31.19 overtime hours per month had he not suffered injuries as a result of appellant’s assault, payable at the same rate he received before the assault. A prima facie case having been made, appellant was free to produce contrary evidence. He did not do so. The court did not abuse its discretion in ordering appellant to pay the Board the sum it paid to Jones.