Governor Brown vetoed a bill (AB 305) that would have prohibited medical problems primarily affecting women from being considered pre-existing conditions when calculating workers’ compensation permanent disability and apportionment. The veto was made after signing legislation to give California women the strongest equal-pay protection in the nation.
This bill attempted to prohibit apportionment if pregnancy or menopause is contemporaneous with the injured worker’s claimed injury. This bill also required that breast cancer not be less than the comparable impairment rating for prostate cancer. It also tried to prohibit apportionment in cases of psychiatric injury caused by sexual harassment or any of the conditions listed above if the conditions are contemporaneous with the psychiatric injury. Senate Floor Amendments of 9/3/15 remove “osteoporosis casually related to menopause” from the list of conditions where apportionment would have been prohibited.
According to state Sen. Marty Block (D-San Diego), the bill was part of an effort to end gender bias in the workplace. Some proponents of the bill have argued that the AMA Guides are not objective, specifically in the area of gender-specific injuries. Specifically, proponents point to the fact that the AMA Guides rate the removal of female breasts at a WPI of 0%, while the removal of a prostate would rate a 16%-20% WPI, arguing that such a rating shows bias against women.
Opponents argued that AB 305 was an attempt to undermine an employer’s use of apportionment when determining liability for permanent disability awards. Specifically, opponents noted that apportionment is more than a decade old and ensures that employers do not need to pay for non-industrial injuries. Further, opponents pointed to case law and statute which protects injured workers from abusive apportionment, including apportionment on the basis of gender. Opponents further argue that AB 305 will increase litigation, raise indemnity costs on employers, and increase systemic instability and subjectivity.
The Democratic governor’s veto message said “The workers compensation system must be free of gender-bias. No group should receive less in benefits because of an immutable characteristic. However, this bill is based on a misunderstanding of the American Medical Associations’ evidence-based standard which is the foundation of the permanent disability ratings, and replaces it with an ill-defined and unscientific standard.”