Menu Close

Category: Daily News

WCIRB Suggests Mid-Year 7.2% Rate Decrease

The WCIRB Governing Committee voted to authorize the WCIRB to submit a mid-year pure premium rate filing to the California Department of Insurance (CDI).

The mid-year filing will propose July 1, 2018 advisory pure premium rates that average $1.80 per $100 of payroll which is 7.2% lower than the Insurance Commissioner’s approved average January 1, 2018 advisory pure premium rate of $1.94 and 19.0% less than the industry average filed pure premium rate as of January 1, 2018 of $2.22.

This proposed July 1, 2018 decrease follows six consecutive decreases since early 2015 and, if approved, will result in an average decrease of more than 35% from the January 1, 2015 advisory pure premium rates.

The Governing Committee’s decision was based on the WCIRB Actuarial Committee’s analysis of insurer loss and loss adjustment experience as of December 31, 2017 which was reviewed at public meetings of the Actuarial Committee held on March 19, and April 3, 2018.

The Actuarial Committee noted that cumulative injury claims continue to increase, particularly in the Los Angeles region. In addition, medical severities show signs of increase after several years of more modest severity trends driven by Senate Bill No. 863 and allocated loss adjustment expenses continue to increase.

Despite these upward pressures on system costs, the Governing Committee believed a reduction in advisory pure premium rates was warranted by the favorable loss development largely driven by significant increases in claim settlement rates, a sharp decline in lien filings following the implementation of Senate Bill No. 1160 and anticipated savings resulting from the new drug formulary.

The WCIRB anticipates submitting its filing to the CDI by April 10, 2018. The filing and all related documents will be available in the Filings and Plans section of the WCIRB website (wcirb.com) and the WCIRB will issue a Wire Story once the filing has been submitted.

Documents related to the Governing Committee meeting, including the agenda and materials displayed or distributed at the meeting, are available on the Committee Documents page of the WCIRB website.

NCCI Studies Cost Shifting from Work Comp to Social Security

The idea that the costs for caring for injured workers have shifted to Social Security Disability Insurance is being disputed by a recent study conducted by the National Council on Compensation Insurance Inc.

The study, released March 26,, as reported by the Insurance Journal, is focused on the interaction between SSDI and workers compensation benefits and explores cost-shifting that may occur between the two programs.

“There have been some allegations or thoughts that perhaps workers comp cuts in benefits or the tightening of compensability standards at the state level might induce injured workers to file for SSDI … we found that the majority of states did not decrease benefits with a specific focus on permanent partial disability and permanent total disability,” said Jim Davis, director and actuary for Boca Raton, Florida-based NCCI.

Looking at the overall amount that is paid through SSDI is important, according to Emily Spieler, a professor of law at Northeastern University School of Law in Boston.

“Over the last 20 years with changes in workers compensation laws, people have always gotten injured at work, they have gotten permanent partial disability settlements, they have tried to go back to work and haven’t been able to return. They will apply for Social Security disability, sometimes while they are receiving the partial benefits, but the amount that is paid out by Social Security over a lifetime for someone who has a workplace injury may be far higher than is paid by workers compensation,” said Ms. Spieler.

NCCI saw the biggest change occur in the number of SSDI applications during the 2007-2009 recession.

“The largest increase in SSDI applications was during the great recession and this is common across states … and that is in contrast or versus any kind of activity at the state level,” said Mr. Davis.

The number of Social Security Disability Insurance beneficiaries rose 58%, and SSDI expenditures grew 138%, to $143 billion from $60 billion, from 2001 to 2015. Since 2010, the number of SSDI beneficiaries has been relatively stable, and spending growth has moderated, according to the study.

In states like Illinois and Nebraska, a person who receives both workers comp permanent total disability benefits and SSDI, in these cases workers comp shoulders a greater portion of total benefits, according to Mr. Davis.

“We have two different programs here. They serve different purposes, and from time to time there might be changes, perhaps to better align the program to its original intent, and that’s what we have seen. We have seen some changes that can shift costs in either direction, but that is not necessarily a bad thing,” said Mr. Davis.

There are still some lingering questions, said Ms. Spieler.

“I think there are three questions, and this research addresses one of them,” she said. “The first is to what extent does workers compensation pay for the costs of disability arising out of injury or illness? – the second question is to what extent have what they call ‘benefit changes’ had an impact on this cost shift? And there I think the report is accurate – the third question is … whether changes in the law have led to reductions in the amount that people are getting in workers compensation, not because the weekly benefits are different but because the way claims are looked at is different.”

DWC Proposes Amended Interpreter Fee Regulations

The Division of Workers’ Compensation (DWC) has posted proposed interpreter fee schedule regulations to its online forum where members of the public may review and comment on the proposals.

The draft regulations include:

– An objective, uniform fee structure based on the federal court system. Higher rates are paid for certified interpreters over provisionally certified, to encourage use of certified interpreters.
– Reduction in double billing fees for multiple interpretations during the same time slot.
– Detailed invoice information and billing codes. The independent bill review procedure will be required to quickly resolve disputes over bill amounts.
– An emphasis on the use of qualified interpreters. Specific documentation of efforts to obtain a certified interpreter is required to ensure that the injured worker is provided with a qualified interpreter.
– Requirements clarifying the selection and arrangement of interpreters.
– New credentialing identification requirements.

The organizations approved to certify interpreters remains unchanged from the current regulations.

For hearings and depositions, an interpreter must be listed as a certified interpreter on either the State Personnel Board or California Courts websites.

For medical treatment or medical-legal evaluations, the interpreter must be either certified for hearings and depositions, certified as a medical interpreter by the California Department of Human Resources, or has a current certification or credential in specific languages by either the Certification Commission for Healthcare Interpreters or the National Board of Certification for Medical Interpreters.

The forum can be found on the DWC forums web page under “current forums.” Comments will be accepted on the forum until 5 p.m. on Friday, April 13, 2018.

Christine Baker Retires as Head of DIR

Christine Baker abruptly retired as Director of the Department of Industrial Relations last week. No public announcement of her decision has been made by the DIR.

Her decision comes as a surprise to the industry stakeholders. According to a post by Julius Young on his blog, her decision was announced by an email she sent last Friday to DIR employees.

Christine Baker was the first woman to serve as director of the Department of Industrial Relations.

Her experience comes from working with labor and management as chief of the Division of Labor Statistics and Research (1984-89), the deputy director for the Division of Workers’ Compensation (1990-94), and the executive officer of the California Commission on Health and Safety and Workers’ Compensation from its inception in 1994 until April 2011. During her tenure as executive officer, the commission’s role expanded to overseeing the health, safety and workers’ compensation systems in California and recommending administrative and legislative changes for improvement.

In April 2011, Christine was named acting director of DIR and was appointed director by Gov. Brown in December. The Senate Rules Committee voted unanimously to confirm her appointment in May 2012.

As director, Christine served as the state administrator of Apprenticeship, the administrator of the state OSHA Plan, an ex officio member of the California Self-Insurers’ Security Fund and an ex officio member of the State Fund board of directors.

Ms. Baker is president-elect of the International Association of Industrial Accident Boards & Commissions (IAIABC), and has chaired the California Insurance Commissioner’s Workers’ Compensation Fraud Focus Group and the advisory committee of the International Forum on Disability Management.

Ms. Baker is the recipient of numerous awards. Small Business California recognized Christine as one of its 2008 Small Business Heroes. In 2012, she received the Human Rights Award from the League of United Latin American Citizens.

DOJ to Craft Non-Monetary Remedies in MDL Opioid Cases

The U.S. Justice Department on Monday sought court permission to participate in settlement negotiations aimed at resolving lawsuits by state and local governments against opioid manufacturers and distributors.

The Justice Department said in a brief it wanted to participate in talks overseen by a federal judge in Cleveland as a “friend of the court” that would provide information to help craft non-monetary remedies to combat the opioid crisis.

“We are determined to see that justice is done in this case and that ultimately we end this nation’s unprecedented drug crisis,” U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement.

Last month, the Justice Department asked U.S. District Judge Dan Polster for 30 days to decide whether to participate in the litigation given the costs the federal government had incurred because of the opioid epidemic.

But Monday’s brief signaled that the Justice Department would not be seeking to participate as an active litigant in the litigation before Polster, who is overseeing at least 433 opioid-related lawsuits brought primarily by cities and counties.

The lawsuits generally accuse drugmakers of deceptively marketing opioids and allege distributors ignored red flags indicating the painkillers were being diverted for improper uses. The defendants have denied wrongdoing.

Polster has been pushing for a global settlement and has invited state attorneys general who have cases and probes not before him to participate in the negotiations.

The defendants include drugmakers Purdue Pharma LP, Johnson & Johnson, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Endo International PLC and Allergan PLC and distributors AmerisourceBergen Corp, Cardinal Health Inc and McKesson Corp.

In Monday’s brief, the Justice Department said that while it was pursuing opioid-related criminal and civil cases, it would not be proper to consolidate them with the lawsuits before Polster.

Nevertheless, it said the federal government could provide information to assist in crafting a settlement. The Justice Department noted the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration had already agreed to produce data on the names and market shares of opioid manufacturers and distributors in each state.

The department said it also had an interest in facilitating discussions about the parties’”legal obligations” given the federal government’s own substantial financial stake in fighting the epidemic.

Four Arrested in Riverside Surgical Center Fraud

The Riverside District Attorney announced that four men were arrested and charged with several felonies stemming from an alleged $8 million health care fraud scheme. The four who were charged with 33 counts were Brian Andrew La Porte, DOB: 7-7-75, of Poway, Dennis Davin Bonavilla, DOB: 1-17-79, of Murrieta, Jeffrey D. Ogletree, DOB: 7-21-74, of Meridian, Idaho, and Babar Iqbal M.D., DOB: 12-18-73, of Irvine

Dr. Babar Iqbal was the head of the Riverside Regional Surgery Center, and allegedly worked with two of the defendants to provide health care for fraudulently claimed “employees” they had sent his way. Iqbal told those people that Medi-Cal wouldn’t cover their treatment and had them sign papers for a free health insurance policy, a district attorney senior investigator said

The California Medical Board records claims that Babar Iqbal graduated Ross University School of Medicine in 2001, and that he is still currently licensed to practice in California with no record of disciplinary action.

Ross University School of Medicine (RUSM) is a private international medical school in Portsmouth, Dominica. It was founded in 1978.

In 1985 California state medical licensing officials began investigating RUSM, along with other medical schools located in the Caribbean. The officials released a report stating that RUSM at that time had nearly no admissions standards, and that the school was in the business of providing medical degrees to “everyone that wants one.”

La Porte, who along with Bonavilla formed the Kingmakers LLC in San Diego and Drexel Group LLC in Wildomar – firms that investigators said were shell companies with no actual employees. They also had connections to Free Choice Healthcare Foundation, an unregistered charity which claimed it was formed to help those in need pay health care premiums.

La Porte, who used the name La Porta in connection with the alleged shell companies set up for the scheme, was released from federal prison in 2013, where he was sent for his role in a $20 million mortgage fraud scheme charged in 2010, according to papers that seek a court review for the source of any bail money La Porte might offer.

Ogletree, in 2013 was a vice president for Hospital Sisters Health System The company operates 16 hospitals and healthcare systems in Illinois and Wisconsin and is based in Springfield Illinois.

Investigators said on Ogletree’s recommendation, Hospital Sisters Health System donated more than $5 million to Free Choice Healthcare Foundation in January 2015. The money was supposed to be used to provide health insurance to 333 poor people in the Midwest for one year.

Defendants received $5 million in fraudulent income through donations made under false pretenses, and another $3 million from illegal kickbacks of funds paid on fraudulent health insurance claims, according to Riverside County District Attorney Senior Investigator Maureen Filley in documents filed with the case in Riverside County Superior Court.

Iqbal’s Riverside Regional Surgery Center drew the attention of the district attorney’s office and the California Department of Insurance in December 2016 when 22 of 23 alleged employees for Kingmakers were treated at the Iqbal’s center within five weeks of getting health insurance policy, with initial claims totaling $4 million.

Investigators also moved in court to have assets frozen at several bank accounts linked to the defendants.

Public Adjuster Sentenced to 10 Years

The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office announced. that an Orange County public adjuster was sentenced to 10 years in state prison for pocketing more than $1.2 million from fire victims’ insurance payouts.

Jose Villa, 62, of San Clemente pleaded no contest to eight felony counts of diverting construction funds exceeding $2,350, said Deputy District Attorney Jeffrey Stodel in a statement. Villa owned and operated Statewide Claims Advisors Inc. in Irvine.

Villa also admitted to sentencing enhancement allegations dealing with excessive taking of property and aggravated white collar crime, prosecutors said.

Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Michael E. Pastor sentenced Villa to prison, imposed a $10,000 fine, and ordered $1.2 million of restitution to the victims.

Villa deposited the victims’ insurance reimbursement checks into his business checking account so he could handle demolition and construction in the months following the fires. He kept most of the insurance money instead of using it for the victims’ benefit, according to prosecutors.

Under the plea agreement, a seven-year prison sentence Villa is serving for another insurance fraud case will run simultaneously with the 10-year term.

Villa, in May 2017, was convicted of two felony counts each of grand theft by embezzlement and forgery for taking insurance proceeds from other fire victims.

The District Attorney’s Office filed charges in October 2017. The case was investigated by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department’s Commercial Crime Bureau and the California Department of Insurance.

The California Department of Insurance revoked Villa’s license to serve as a public adjuster and permanently barred him from applying for or holding any license it issues.

Walmart and Humana Consider Merger

The emergence of talks between Walmart Inc. WMT 1.37% and Humana Inc. HUM 0.48% creates pressure on the health-care companies that haven’t yet made deals, amid the rapid-fire integration that is reshaping the business of managing health care.

A Walmart-Humana deal—which is far from assured, as the companies are in early-stage talks about a variety of possible options—would become the latest sign of the sector’s rapid move toward combinations that unite different businesses under one roof. It would come in the wake of the $69 billion deal between drugstore chain and pharmacy-benefit manager CVS Health Corp. and insurer Aetna Inc., and insurer Cigna Corp.’s CI -0.34% $54 billion agreement to acquire the biggest PBM, Express Scripts Holding Co. ESRX -0.93%

The spotlight is on remaining companies such as Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. WBA -3.14% and Anthem Inc., ANTM -0.80% as well as smaller health insurers that could broaden their roles into different sectors, analysts said.

“Whether you’re a payer, a retail clinic, a retailer, a PBM or a pharma company, you’re thinking, ‘how do I start to blur those lines and start playing across those lines,’ ” said Gurpreet Singh, Health Services leader at PwC.

U.S. drugstores are under pressure to move beyond dispensing prescriptions and selling candy, makeup and soda as Amazon.com Inc. AMZN 1.11% chips away at the companies’ retail business and cost-control efforts by insurers pressure drug margins. Amazon has also signaled it may go deeper into the health-care and pharmaceutical sectors, which would add to the threat.

Asked about the possibility of a deal during a call with analysts on Wednesday, Walgreens Boots Chief Executive Stefano Pessina said the pharmacy industry is in need of a major overhaul, but “I don’t believe that the change is only possible if you merge with a health plan.” He added: “The main transformation will be to adapt the stores to what the future customer will require.”

Walgreens has nevertheless been pursuing a big deal. Resistance from federal antitrust regulators derailed the company’s attempt last year to acquire rival pharmacy chain Rite Aid Corp. Instead, it agreed to buy about 2,000 Rite Aid stores for around $4 billion.

The Deerfield, Ill., company, with more than 13,000 stores in 11 countries, recently made an approach to drug distributor AmerisourceBergen Corp. ABC 1.29% , The Wall Street Journal reported in February. Negotiations have since stalled, but could restart, according to people familiar with the talks. Walgreens executives declined to discuss Amerisource discussions when asked this week on an earnings call.

In the insurance sector, analysts said, smaller companies like WellCare Health Plans Inc. WCG 1.77% have long been seen as targets for acquisition. Centene Corp. CNC 6.50% , a giant in the Medicaid space, has been growing rapidly through acquisitions, including its effort to take over nonprofit New York health insurer Fidelis Care. Centene “hasn’t been sitting still,” said Ana Gupte, an analyst with Leerink Partners LLC. “They have been growing well organically and inorganically.”

Centene also recently invested in a PBM known as RxAdvance, a move that CEO Michael Neidorff highlighted at recent investor conference. “You’ll be hearing a lot more about it,” he said.

UnitedHealth Group Inc., UNH -2.06% parent of the biggest U.S. insurer, is already vertically integrated, with its ownership of a growing roster of doctor groups and surgery centers as well as its own PBM. The health giant has remained on the M&A warpath in recent months, including its announcement in December that it will buy DaVita Inc.’s DVA -0.09% big physician group.

Anthem, for its part, has embarked on a vertical move without a big acquisition—it is starting its own PBM, set to launch in 2020, when its current PBM deal with Express Scripts ends. The insurer’s new CEO, Gail K. Boudreaux, has said she is focused on strengthening Anthem’s own operations and expects major savings and growth from the new PBM, which could serve Anthem’s fellow Blue Cross and Blue Shield insurers, among other clients.

Asked about the Cigna deal at a recent investor conference, Ms. Boudreaux said it hadn’t changed Anthem’s thinking. “We love the capital efficiency of the model we have and feel really good about what we’ve done,” she said.

Anthem, which has deep local market share, has the scale to “go it alone for a while,” said Ms. Gupte. Down the road, analysts have said, Anthem may also have acquisition opportunities among other Blue Cross and Blue Shield insurers, an option that would be far more difficult for other major national insurers that aren’t already Blue plans themselves. Anthem already has Blue plans in 14 states.

Florida “Rogue Rehabs” Invade California

The Orange County Register reports that Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckas recently created a task force to handle abuses in the anti-addiction industry in the “Rehab Riviera.

Rackauckas is hoping to repeat the success of Palm Beach County State Attorney Dave Aronberg, who created a similar task force two years ago. Since then, Palm Beach officials have made 44 rehab-industry related arrests.

It also has driven many of the rogue rehabs out of that state – and straight to Southern California.

Aronberg recently spoke to reporters at the Orange County Register about sober living homes and treatment centers in Florida.

According to Aronberg “We’ve seen an influx of thousands of young people descend upon South Florida to enter rehab, and then leave only in an ambulance or body bag. Seventy-five percent of all individuals in private pay rehab in Florida come from out of state …. In the past two years, we have led a crackdown on fraud (and) abuse in the drug treatment industry.

“We’re seeing an exodus of bad players out of the county to other warm weather climates, including Orange County.”

He says that it starts with “deceptive marketing; the operator sends a free plane ticket (to the addict), which (in Florida) is a third-degree felony.”

“They lure you down here into a detox or patient recovery center. The individual always has insurance, either on their own or under Affordable Care Act exchanges. If they don’t, the marketer will pay for their insurance and often lie about the address” That’s how the fraud starts.

They go through detox, in-patient care (followed by) outpatient care in a sober home, which is an unregulated group home under the protection of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Fair Housing Act. Then, once insurance runs out, they either go home, live with their parents and find a job, or they relapse. And the illegal benefits – such as free rent, transportation and other things – begin anew.

He suggests impaneling a grand jury to look at the issue. “It gives it a local flavor. And I think that’s important. It also gives political strength behind your legislation.”

“In the meantime, enact a tough anti-patient brokering law at the state level.”

Number three, “lobby Congress to allow local governments to enact reasonable measures. In the meantime, consider following the leads of Prescott, AZ., Delray Beach and Boynton Beach, who are out sticking their necks out (with local ordinances).”

Homeowner Protected by Exclusive Remedy Rule

Lanelle D. Bergen, a property owner, hired KL Construction, Inc., a licensed general building contractor, to build an addition to her home and replace her garage.

Once the owner wrote an initial deposit check, KL Construction’s managing officer Kwok Wong then asked Bergen to write payment checks directly to individual workers, saying this would be easier for him as he would not have to deposit her checks and then write more checks paying workers; Bergen agreed.

KL Construction did not issue W-2 forms or 1099 forms to the workers reporting the income Bergen provided in those checks, did not make payroll deductions for the income, and did not include the income in payroll reports it submitted to its workers’ compensation insurance carrier, State Compensation Insurance Fund.

There is no evidence Bergen was aware of these omissions.

Wong negotiated an oral agreement with a subcontractor, Miguel Gonzalez of Miguel’s Stucco, to perform stucco work. Bergen wrote Gonzalez a check. Gonzalez brought Francisco Carrillo-Torres and two or three other people to help him do the stucco work. Torres slipped off of an improperly constructed scaffold and suffered severe injuries.SCIF agreed to accept the claim Torres subsequently submitted.

Torres filed a complaint against Bergen alleging one cause of action for premises liability and negligence. He contended Bergen was his employer on the home remodel project, but that he did not qualify for workers’ compensation coverage under her homeowner’s insurance policy, because he did not work the required number of hours.

The trial court issued an order granting summary judgment in favor of Bergen. The court of appeal sustained the dismissal in the unpublished case of Carrillo-Torres v. Bergen.

Torres contended that the trial court erred in applying the California Supreme Court’s decision in Privette to conclude Bergen was not liable for his injuries, because Bergen’s and KL Construction’s payroll practices “subverted the federal and state systems for taxation and benefits related to laborers.”

Torres did not explain his own two-year delay in submitting a workers’ compensation claim after he secured the representation of counsel. SCIF agreed to compensate Torres, approved medical treatment for him, and was collecting information to determine the amount of his benefits.

Torres cites no legal authority indicating that a delay defeats workers’ compensation exclusivity or creates an exception to the Privette rule. Case law confirms that the trigger for workers’ compensation exclusivity is a compensable injury.